Seek Returns

Ford (F) vs. Toyota (TM)

This page compares Ford (F) with Toyota (TM) using historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation metrics.

Company Profile

Ford (F) and Toyota (TM) are both classified in the Automobile Manufacturers sub-industry within the broader Automobiles industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Ford (F) trades as a standard ordinary-equity line, while Toyota (TM) is an ADR tied to a foreign-share or depositary-receipt structure — compare with FX exposure, program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

SymbolFTM
Company NameFord Motor CompanyToyota Motor Corporation
Country/RegionUnited StatesJapan
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS Industry GroupAutomobiles & ComponentsAutomobiles & Components
GICS IndustryAutomobilesAutomobiles
GICS Sub-IndustryAutomobile ManufacturersAutomobile Manufacturers
Market Capitalization52.04 billion USD241.73 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 1, 1972March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

F
TM
Loading price history…
Ford (F) vs. Toyota (TM): Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFTM
5-Day Price Return-3.76%0.60%
13-Week Price Return-7.57%-20.70%
26-Week Price Return-1.80%-5.77%
52-Week Price Return21.49%14.38%
Month-to-Date Return8.11%-2.18%
Year-to-Date Return-0.46%-11.89%
10-Day Avg. Volume84.32M36.51M
3-Month Avg. Volume60.32M24.56M
3-Month Volatility46.53%35.59%
Beta1.681.48

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

Ford (F) reports a negative Return on Equity (TTM) of -14.72%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Toyota (TM) reports 10.10%, ranking against industry peers normally.

F

Automobiles & Components industry group

-14.72%

Max
41.86%
Q3
10.10%
Median
4.09%
Q1
-21.56%
Min
-61.80%

TM

Automobiles & Components industry group

10.10%

Max
41.86%
Q3
10.10%
Median
4.09%
Q1
-21.56%
Min
-61.80%
Ford (F) vs. Toyota (TM): A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Automobiles & Components industry group benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

Ford (F) reports a negative Net Profit Margin (TTM) of -3.22%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Toyota (TM) reports 7.59%, ranking against industry peers normally.

F

Automobiles & Components industry group

-3.22%

Max
14.75%
Q3
4.52%
Median
1.68%
Q1
-5.33%
Min
-14.50%

TM

Automobiles & Components industry group

7.59%

Max
14.75%
Q3
4.52%
Median
1.68%
Q1
-5.33%
Min
-14.50%
Ford (F) vs. Toyota (TM): A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Automobiles & Components industry group benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

Ford (F) reports a negative Operating Profit Margin (TTM) of -3.77%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Toyota (TM) reports 7.43%, ranking against industry peers normally.

F

Automobiles & Components industry group

-3.77%

Max
17.87%
Q3
7.07%
Median
3.34%
Q1
-3.65%
Min
-12.05%

TM

Automobiles & Components industry group

7.43%

Max
17.87%
Q3
7.07%
Median
3.34%
Q1
-3.65%
Min
-12.05%
Ford (F) vs. Toyota (TM): A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Automobiles & Components industry group benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFTM
Return on Equity (TTM)-14.72%10.10%
Return on Assets (TTM)-2.10%3.86%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-3.22%7.59%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-3.77%7.43%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)6.99%16.70%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Toyota (TM) at 1.27 keeps Current Ratio (MRQ) within its industry mid-range, while Ford (F) at 1.09 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for F.

F

Automobiles & Components industry group

1.09

Max
3.73
Q3
2.27
Median
1.75
Q1
1.11
Min
0.43

TM

Automobiles & Components industry group

1.27

Max
3.73
Q3
2.27
Median
1.75
Q1
1.11
Min
0.43
Ford (F) vs. Toyota (TM): A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobiles & Components industry group benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

Toyota (TM) at 1.08 is around its industry mid-range for Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ), while Ford (F) at 4.20 sits above its industry benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.

F

Automobiles & Components industry group

4.20

Max
2.33
Q3
1.13
Median
0.70
Q1
0.28
Min
0.00

TM

Automobiles & Components industry group

1.08

Max
2.33
Q3
1.13
Median
0.70
Q1
0.28
Min
0.00
Ford (F) vs. Toyota (TM): A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobiles & Components industry group benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

Toyota (TM) has no Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) value reported for this period; Ford (F) reports -3.48, with operating income or EBIT not fully covering interest expense.

F

Automobiles & Components industry group

-3.48

Max
25.00
Q3
10.92
Median
2.16
Q1
-4.10
Min
-21.51

TM

Automobiles & Components industry group

--

Max
25.00
Q3
10.92
Median
2.16
Q1
-4.10
Min
-21.51
Ford (F) vs. Toyota (TM): A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Automobiles & Components industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFTM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.091.27
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.941.12
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)4.201.08
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.48--

Growth

Revenue Growth

Ford (F) vs. Toyota (TM): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth at a Glance

SymbolFTM
Revenue Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)6.38%1.89%
Revenue Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)3.82%5.51%
3-Year Revenue CAGR5.82%10.91%
5-Year Revenue CAGR8.05%13.24%

EPS Growth

Ford (F) vs. Toyota (TM): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth at a Glance

SymbolFTM
EPS Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)433.13%23.24%
EPS Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)---18.00%
3-Year EPS CAGR--18.05%
5-Year EPS CAGR--13.31%

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Ford (F) at 4.60% and Toyota (TM) at 3.22% report Dividend Yield (TTM) in the top quartile of industry peers, indicating higher cash yield relative to share price than typical competitors.

F

Automobiles & Components industry group

4.60%

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.45%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TM

Automobiles & Components industry group

3.22%

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.45%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Ford (F) vs. Toyota (TM): A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Automobiles & Components industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Ford (F) at 24.10% maintains Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) around its industry median — a balanced dividend policy. Toyota (TM) at 59.03% sits outside the typical mid-range, leaning toward more retention or more distribution than the industry median.

F

Automobiles & Components industry group

24.10%

Max
59.03%
Q3
30.73%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TM

Automobiles & Components industry group

59.03%

Max
59.03%
Q3
30.73%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Ford (F) vs. Toyota (TM): A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Automobiles & Components industry group benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFTM
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.60%3.22%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)24.10%59.03%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

Toyota (TM) reports Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) of 10.01 and can be ranked against industry peers; Ford (F) has no value available for this period, so a direct comparison isn’t possible.

F

Automobiles & Components industry group

--

Max
55.25
Q3
34.73
Median
20.47
Q1
12.68
Min
10.01

TM

Automobiles & Components industry group

10.01

Max
55.25
Q3
34.73
Median
20.47
Q1
12.68
Min
10.01
Ford (F) vs. Toyota (TM): A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Automobiles & Components industry group benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

Ford (F) at 0.27 trades in the lower-multiple quartile for Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM), while Toyota (TM) at 0.76 sits around the industry midpoint — F has a lower trailing revenue multiple relative to peers, though the gap should be read alongside growth and margins.

F

Automobiles & Components industry group

0.27

Max
4.04
Q3
1.89
Median
0.75
Q1
0.39
Min
0.09

TM

Automobiles & Components industry group

0.76

Max
4.04
Q3
1.89
Median
0.75
Q1
0.39
Min
0.09
Ford (F) vs. Toyota (TM): A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Automobiles & Components industry group benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

Both Ford (F) at 1.24 and Toyota (TM) at 1.24 post Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) near the typical industry midpoint — neither company stands out strongly from peers on book-value multiple.

F

Automobiles & Components industry group

1.24

Max
4.36
Q3
2.97
Median
1.59
Q1
1.18
Min
0.29

TM

Automobiles & Components industry group

1.24

Max
4.36
Q3
2.97
Median
1.59
Q1
1.18
Min
0.29
Ford (F) vs. Toyota (TM): A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobiles & Components industry group benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFTM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--10.01
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.270.76
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.241.24
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)4.1845.40