F vs. TM: Ford vs. Toyota Motor Stock Comparison
How do Ford (F) and Toyota Motor (TM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Ford (F) and Toyota Motor (TM) are both classified in the Automobile Manufacturers sub-industry within the broader Automobiles industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
Ford (F) trades as ordinary local shares, while Toyota Motor (TM) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | F | TM |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Ford Motor Company | Toyota Motor Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | Japan |
| GICS Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| GICS Industry Group | Automobiles & Components | Automobiles & Components |
| GICS Industry | Automobiles | Automobiles |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Automobile Manufacturers | Automobile Manufacturers |
| Market Capitalization | 55.39 billion USD | 199.43 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | June 1, 1972 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | F | TM |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 34.43% | -2.23% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Ford (F) has an aggressive beta of 1.83, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Toyota Motor (TM) is defensive at 0.58 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
Ford (F) is heavily traded at around 58.56M shares per day, whereas Toyota Motor (TM) sees a more moderate 484.06K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.
Risk Metrics
| Metric | F | TM |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 37.54% | 29.56% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.83 | 0.58 |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 58.56M | 484.06K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Ford (F) reports a negative ROE of -14.81%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Toyota Motor (TM) reports 10.23%, ranking against industry peers normally.
F
Automobiles & Components industry group
-14.81%
- Max
- 41.97%
- Q3
- 11.32%
- Median
- 5.13%
- Q1
- -14.13%
- F
- -14.81%
- Min
- -49.98%
TM
Automobiles & Components industry group
10.23%
- Max
- 41.97%
- Q3
- 11.32%
- TM
- 10.23%
- Median
- 5.13%
- Q1
- -14.13%
- Min
- -49.98%
Net Margin (TTM)
Ford (F) reports a negative net margin of -3.22%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Toyota Motor (TM) reports 7.59%, ranking against industry peers normally.
F
Automobiles & Components industry group
-3.22%
- Max
- 15.12%
- Q3
- 4.33%
- Median
- 1.47%
- Q1
- -3.14%
- F
- -3.22%
- Min
- -13.87%
TM
Automobiles & Components industry group
7.59%
- Max
- 15.12%
- TM
- 7.59%
- Q3
- 4.33%
- Median
- 1.47%
- Q1
- -3.14%
- Min
- -13.87%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Ford (F) at 5.74% and Toyota Motor (TM) at 4.57% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
F
Automobiles & Components industry group
5.74%
- Max
- 29.48%
- Q3
- 8.69%
- F
- 5.74%
- Median
- 3.45%
- Q1
- -5.57%
- Min
- -19.36%
TM
Automobiles & Components industry group
4.57%
- Max
- 29.48%
- Q3
- 8.69%
- TM
- 4.57%
- Median
- 3.45%
- Q1
- -5.57%
- Min
- -19.36%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | F | TM |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | -14.81% | 10.23% |
| ROA (TTM) | 0.34% | 2.37% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | -3.22% | 7.59% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 5.74% | 4.57% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 7.06% | 16.71% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Revenue Growth Metrics
| Metric | F | TM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 1.23% | 5.51% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 5.82% | 10.91% |
EPS Growth
EPS Growth Metrics
| Metric | F | TM |
|---|---|---|
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -241.10% | -17.89% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Toyota Motor (TM) at 1.27 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Ford (F) at 1.09 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for F.
F
Automobiles & Components industry group
1.09
- Max
- 4.97
- Q3
- 2.67
- Median
- 1.83
- Q1
- 1.12
- F
- 1.09
- Min
- 0.06
TM
Automobiles & Components industry group
1.27
- Max
- 4.97
- Q3
- 2.67
- Median
- 1.83
- TM
- 1.27
- Q1
- 1.12
- Min
- 0.06
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Toyota Motor (TM) at 1.07 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Ford (F) at 4.26 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.
F
Automobiles & Components industry group
4.26
- F
- 4.26
- Max
- 2.53
- Q3
- 1.19
- Median
- 0.72
- Q1
- 0.26
- Min
- 0.00
TM
Automobiles & Components industry group
1.07
- Max
- 2.53
- Q3
- 1.19
- TM
- 1.07
- Median
- 0.72
- Q1
- 0.26
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | F | TM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.09 | 1.27 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 4.26 | 1.07 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 18.18 | 5.35 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Ford (F) at 4.28% earns its spot in the top quartile of its industry’s yields; Toyota Motor (TM) at 55.44% is past the top of its own peer range — territory where a dividend-safety check matters more than the headline number.
F
Automobiles & Components industry group
4.28%
- F
- 4.28%
- Max
- 4.28%
- Q3
- 1.73%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
TM
Automobiles & Components industry group
55.44%
- TM
- 55.44%
- Max
- 4.28%
- Q3
- 1.73%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Toyota Motor (TM) at 31.40% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Ford (F) at 64.10% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
F
Automobiles & Components industry group
64.10%
- Max
- 82.28%
- F
- 64.10%
- Q3
- 33.54%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
TM
Automobiles & Components industry group
31.40%
- Max
- 82.28%
- Q3
- 33.54%
- TM
- 31.40%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | F | TM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 4.28% | 55.44% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 64.10% | 31.40% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Toyota Motor (TM) trades at 9.22 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Ford (F) has no P/E ratio this period.
F
Automobiles & Components industry group
--
- Max
- 46.73
- Q3
- 30.30
- Median
- 22.51
- Q1
- 13.30
- Min
- 6.29
- F
- --
TM
Automobiles & Components industry group
9.22
- Max
- 46.73
- Q3
- 30.30
- Median
- 22.51
- Q1
- 13.30
- TM
- 9.22
- Min
- 6.29
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Both Ford (F) at 0.29 and Toyota Motor (TM) at 0.00 fetch a relatively low price per dollar of sales, landing in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.
F
Automobiles & Components industry group
0.29
- Max
- 4.05
- Q3
- 1.86
- Median
- 0.62
- Q1
- 0.31
- F
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
TM
Automobiles & Components industry group
0.00
- Max
- 4.05
- Q3
- 1.86
- Median
- 0.62
- Q1
- 0.31
- TM
- 0.00
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Ford (F) at 1.48 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Toyota Motor (TM) at 14.25 prices above its benchmark range — TM looks rich relative to book.
F
Automobiles & Components industry group
1.48
- Max
- 4.19
- Q3
- 2.33
- F
- 1.48
- Median
- 1.32
- Q1
- 0.65
- Min
- -1.82
TM
Automobiles & Components industry group
14.25
- TM
- 14.25
- Max
- 4.19
- Q3
- 2.33
- Median
- 1.32
- Q1
- 0.65
- Min
- -1.82
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | F | TM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | -- | 9.22 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 0.00 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.48 | 14.25 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -4.06% | -604.15% |