Seek Returns

EG vs. MET: Everest vs. MetLife Stock Comparison

How do Everest (EG) and MetLife (MET) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Everest (EG) and MetLife (MET) both belong to the Insurance industry, though EG is classified under Reinsurance while MET falls under Life & Health Insurance.

Company profile comparison for Everest (EG) and MetLife (MET)
Profile ItemEGMET
NameEverest Group, Ltd.MetLife, Inc.
Country/RegionBermudaUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS Industry GroupInsuranceInsurance
GICS IndustryInsuranceInsurance
GICS Sub-IndustryReinsuranceLife & Health Insurance
Market Capitalization15.23 billion USD61.76 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 3, 1995April 5, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

EG
MET
GSPC
Loading price history…
Everest (EG) vs. MetLife (MET), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Everest (EG) and MetLife (MET). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Everest (EG) and MetLife (MET). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Everest (EG) and MetLife (MET)
MetricEGMET
Total Return (1Y)28.99%38.57%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)4.67%23.59%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)10.80%13.62%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

EG
MET
GSPC
Loading price history…
Everest (EG) vs. MetLife (MET), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Everest (EG) and MetLife (MET). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Everest (EG) and MetLife (MET)
MetricEGMET
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)21.71%24.21%
Beta (5Y)0.230.77
Max Drawdown (5Y)-23.84%-35.09%
Avg. Volume (3M)382.05K3.05M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
EG and MET are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Everest (EG) and MetLife (MET)
MetricEGMET
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.141.42
Sortino Ratio (1Y)1.772.10

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Everest (EG) at 12.77% and MetLife (MET) at 19.92% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

EG

Insurance industry group

12.77%

Max
41.68%
Q3
22.04%
Median
14.81%
EG
12.77%
Q1
8.79%
Min
-10.66%

MET

Insurance industry group

19.92%

Max
41.68%
Q3
22.04%
MET
19.92%
Median
14.81%
Q1
8.79%
Min
-10.66%
Loading chart…
Everest (EG) vs. MetLife (MET): A comparison of their ROE against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Everest (EG) at 11.68% and MetLife (MET) at 6.21% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

EG

Insurance industry group

11.68%

Max
29.92%
Q3
17.03%
EG
11.68%
Median
10.97%
Q1
6.21%
Min
-4.68%

MET

Insurance industry group

6.21%

Max
29.92%
Q3
17.03%
Median
10.97%
MET
6.21%
Q1
6.21%
Min
-4.68%
Loading chart…
Everest (EG) vs. MetLife (MET): A comparison of their net margin against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Everest (EG) in Insurance and MetLife (MET) in Insurance, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Everest (EG) and MetLife (MET)
MetricEGMET
ROE (TTM)12.77%19.92%
ROA (TTM)2.43%0.60%
Net Margin (TTM)11.68%6.21%
Operating Margin (TTM)----
Gross Margin (TTM)----

Growth

Revenue Growth

MetLife (MET) at 7.88% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Everest (EG) at 0.83% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
Everest (EG) vs. MetLife (MET): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Everest (EG) at 18.94% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while MetLife (MET) at -21.04% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Loading chart…
Everest (EG) vs. MetLife (MET): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Everest (EG) and MetLife (MET)
MetricEGMET
Revenue Growth (YoY)0.83%7.88%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)12.84%3.92%
EPS Growth (YoY)18.94%-21.04%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)35.51%18.50%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Everest (EG) in Insurance and MetLife (MET) in Insurance both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Everest (EG) in Insurance and MetLife (MET) in Insurance run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Everest (EG) and MetLife (MET)
MetricEGMET
Current Ratio (MRQ)----
Debt / Equity (MRQ)----
Net Debt / EBITDA----

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Everest (EG) at 1.91% and MetLife (MET) at 0.57% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

EG

Insurance industry group

1.91%

Max
5.12%
Q3
2.15%
EG
1.91%
Median
0.98%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MET

Insurance industry group

0.57%

Max
5.12%
Q3
2.15%
Median
0.98%
MET
0.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Everest (EG) vs. MetLife (MET): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Everest (EG) at 16.81% and MetLife (MET) at 30.33% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

EG

Insurance industry group

16.81%

Max
76.67%
Q3
35.18%
EG
16.81%
Median
14.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MET

Insurance industry group

30.33%

Max
76.67%
Q3
35.18%
MET
30.33%
Median
14.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Everest (EG) vs. MetLife (MET): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Everest (EG) and MetLife (MET)
MetricEGMET
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.91%0.57%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)16.81%30.33%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Everest (EG) at 8.64 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while MetLife (MET) at 12.85 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for EG, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

EG

Insurance industry group

8.64

Max
28.37
Q3
18.75
Median
12.23
Q1
9.08
EG
8.64
Min
2.32

MET

Insurance industry group

12.85

Max
28.37
Q3
18.75
MET
12.85
Median
12.23
Q1
9.08
Min
2.32
Loading chart…
Everest (EG) vs. MetLife (MET): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

MetLife (MET) at 0.75 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Everest (EG) at 0.94 prices around its industry’s middle — MET costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

EG

Insurance industry group

0.94

Max
4.03
Q3
2.25
Median
1.23
EG
0.94
Q1
0.85
Min
0.07

MET

Insurance industry group

0.75

Max
4.03
Q3
2.25
Median
1.23
Q1
0.85
MET
0.75
Min
0.07
Loading chart…
Everest (EG) vs. MetLife (MET): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Everest (EG) at 1.08 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while MetLife (MET) at 2.79 is valued near its industry’s middle — EG is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.

EG

Insurance industry group

1.08

Max
5.07
Q3
2.79
Median
1.76
Q1
1.23
EG
1.08
Min
0.30

MET

Insurance industry group

2.79

Max
5.07
Q3
2.79
MET
2.79
Median
1.76
Q1
1.23
Min
0.30
Loading chart…
Everest (EG) vs. MetLife (MET): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Everest (EG) and MetLife (MET)
MetricEGMET
P/E Ratio (TTM)8.6412.85
P/S Ratio (TTM)0.940.75
P/B Ratio (MRQ)1.082.79
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)----