Seek Returns logo

MET vs. PGR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MET and PGR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMETPGR
Company NameMetLife, Inc.The Progressive Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS IndustryInsuranceInsurance
Market Capitalization54.49 billion USD144.52 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateApril 5, 2000March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MET and PGR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MET vs. PGR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMETPGR
5-Day Price Return2.15%2.90%
13-Week Price Return2.42%-7.46%
26-Week Price Return-1.86%-9.39%
52-Week Price Return-0.13%-1.65%
Month-to-Date Return1.24%-0.04%
Year-to-Date Return0.60%3.06%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.40M3.17M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.16M3.34M
3-Month Volatility21.24%18.80%
Beta0.880.31

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MET

15.11%

Insurance Industry

Max
30.96%
Q3
18.76%
Median
14.22%
Q1
10.34%
Min
1.73%

MET’s Return on Equity of 15.11% is on par with the norm for the Insurance industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PGR

36.50%

Insurance Industry

Max
30.96%
Q3
18.76%
Median
14.22%
Q1
10.34%
Min
1.73%

PGR’s Return on Equity of 36.50% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Insurance industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MET vs. PGR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MET

5.87%

Insurance Industry

Max
26.78%
Q3
14.69%
Median
9.87%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-3.51%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Insurance industry, MET’s Net Profit Margin of 5.87% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

PGR

12.66%

Insurance Industry

Max
26.78%
Q3
14.69%
Median
9.87%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-3.51%

PGR’s Net Profit Margin of 12.66% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Insurance industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MET vs. PGR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MET

9.33%

Insurance Industry

Max
34.52%
Q3
20.17%
Median
14.46%
Q1
9.62%
Min
-2.51%

In the Insurance industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

PGR

16.28%

Insurance Industry

Max
34.52%
Q3
20.17%
Median
14.46%
Q1
9.62%
Min
-2.51%

In the Insurance industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

MET vs. PGR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMETPGR
Return on Equity (TTM)15.11%36.50%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.62%9.53%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.87%12.66%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.33%16.28%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)----

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MET

0.04

Insurance Industry

Max
2.97
Q3
1.37
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

For the Insurance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

PGR

0.08

Insurance Industry

Max
2.97
Q3
1.37
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

For the Insurance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

MET vs. PGR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MET

0.72

Insurance Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.65
Median
0.34
Q1
0.23
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Insurance industry.

PGR

0.21

Insurance Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.65
Median
0.34
Q1
0.23
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Insurance industry.

MET vs. PGR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MET

6.12

Insurance Industry

Max
43.68
Q3
21.45
Median
9.67
Q1
3.55
Min
-5.73

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Insurance industry.

PGR

39.40

Insurance Industry

Max
43.68
Q3
21.45
Median
9.67
Q1
3.55
Min
-5.73

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Insurance industry.

MET vs. PGR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMETPGR
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.040.08
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.040.04
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.720.21
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.1239.40

Growth

Revenue Growth

MET vs. PGR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MET vs. PGR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MET

3.12%

Insurance Industry

Max
9.80%
Q3
5.18%
Median
3.58%
Q1
2.07%
Min
0.00%

MET’s Dividend Yield of 3.12% is consistent with its peers in the Insurance industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PGR

1.98%

Insurance Industry

Max
9.80%
Q3
5.18%
Median
3.58%
Q1
2.07%
Min
0.00%

PGR’s Dividend Yield of 1.98% is in the lower quartile for the Insurance industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

MET vs. PGR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MET

39.96%

Insurance Industry

Max
169.40%
Q3
85.57%
Median
53.26%
Q1
23.68%
Min
0.00%

MET’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.96% is within the typical range for the Insurance industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PGR

27.53%

Insurance Industry

Max
169.40%
Q3
85.57%
Median
53.26%
Q1
23.68%
Min
0.00%

PGR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.53% is within the typical range for the Insurance industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MET vs. PGR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMETPGR
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.12%1.98%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)39.96%27.53%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MET

12.82

Insurance Industry

Max
30.75
Q3
18.11
Median
12.67
Q1
9.66
Min
2.87

MET’s P/E Ratio of 12.82 is within the middle range for the Insurance industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PGR

13.89

Insurance Industry

Max
30.75
Q3
18.11
Median
12.67
Q1
9.66
Min
2.87

PGR’s P/E Ratio of 13.89 is within the middle range for the Insurance industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MET vs. PGR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MET

0.75

Insurance Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
1.88
Median
1.22
Q1
0.80
Min
0.23

In the lower quartile for the Insurance industry, MET’s P/S Ratio of 0.75 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

PGR

1.76

Insurance Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
1.88
Median
1.22
Q1
0.80
Min
0.23

PGR’s P/S Ratio of 1.76 aligns with the market consensus for the Insurance industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MET vs. PGR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MET

1.95

Insurance Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.56
Median
1.88
Q1
1.20
Min
0.17

MET’s P/B Ratio of 1.95 is within the conventional range for the Insurance industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PGR

4.80

Insurance Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.56
Median
1.88
Q1
1.20
Min
0.17

At 4.80, PGR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Insurance industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MET vs. PGR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMETPGR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.8213.89
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.751.76
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.954.80
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)3.618.80