EG vs. MRSH: Everest vs. Marsh & McLennan Stock Comparison
How do Everest (EG) and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Everest (EG) and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) both belong to the Insurance industry, though EG is classified under Reinsurance while MRSH falls under Insurance Brokers.
| Profile Item | EG | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Everest Group, Ltd. | Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. |
| Country/Region | Bermuda | United States |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Insurance | Insurance |
| GICS Industry | Insurance | Insurance |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Reinsurance | Insurance Brokers |
| Market Capitalization | 15.23 billion USD | 97.39 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | October 3, 1995 | February 21, 1973 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | EG | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 28.99% | 16.87% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 4.67% | 3.11% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 10.80% | 6.23% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | EG | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 21.71% | 26.15% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.23 | 0.51 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -23.84% | -34.36% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 382.05K | 2.43M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | EG | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.14 | 0.48 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.77 | 0.74 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 27.24% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Everest (EG) at 12.77% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for MRSH.
EG
Insurance industry group
12.77%
- Max
- 41.68%
- Q3
- 22.04%
- Median
- 14.81%
- EG
- 12.77%
- Q1
- 8.79%
- Min
- -10.66%
MRSH
Insurance industry group
27.24%
- Max
- 41.68%
- MRSH
- 27.24%
- Q3
- 22.04%
- Median
- 14.81%
- Q1
- 8.79%
- Min
- -10.66%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Everest (EG) at 11.68% and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 14.20% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
EG
Insurance industry group
11.68%
- Max
- 29.92%
- Q3
- 17.03%
- EG
- 11.68%
- Median
- 10.97%
- Q1
- 6.21%
- Min
- -4.68%
MRSH
Insurance industry group
14.20%
- Max
- 29.92%
- Q3
- 17.03%
- MRSH
- 14.20%
- Median
- 10.97%
- Q1
- 6.21%
- Min
- -4.68%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Everest (EG) in Insurance and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) in Insurance, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | EG | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 12.77% | 27.24% |
| ROA (TTM) | 2.43% | 7.35% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.68% | 14.20% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 10.32% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Everest (EG) at 0.83% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both Everest (EG) at 18.94% and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 3.06% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | EG | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 0.83% | 10.32% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 12.84% | 9.20% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 18.94% | 3.06% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 35.51% | 11.75% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Everest (EG) in Insurance and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) in Insurance both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Everest (EG) in Insurance and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) in Insurance run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | EG | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Everest (EG) at 1.91% and Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 1.80% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
EG
Insurance industry group
1.91%
- Max
- 5.12%
- Q3
- 2.15%
- EG
- 1.91%
- Median
- 0.98%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MRSH
Insurance industry group
1.80%
- Max
- 5.12%
- Q3
- 2.15%
- MRSH
- 1.80%
- Median
- 0.98%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Everest (EG) at 16.81% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 44.14% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
EG
Insurance industry group
16.81%
- Max
- 76.67%
- Q3
- 35.18%
- EG
- 16.81%
- Median
- 14.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MRSH
Insurance industry group
44.14%
- Max
- 76.67%
- MRSH
- 44.14%
- Q3
- 35.18%
- Median
- 14.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | EG | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.91% | 1.80% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 16.81% | 44.14% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Everest (EG) at 8.64 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 24.50 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.
EG
Insurance industry group
8.64
- Max
- 28.37
- Q3
- 18.75
- Median
- 12.23
- Q1
- 9.08
- EG
- 8.64
- Min
- 2.32
MRSH
Insurance industry group
24.50
- Max
- 28.37
- MRSH
- 24.50
- Q3
- 18.75
- Median
- 12.23
- Q1
- 9.08
- Min
- 2.32
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Everest (EG) at 0.94 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 3.42 sits in the pricier quartile — MRSH costs more per dollar of sales.
EG
Insurance industry group
0.94
- Max
- 4.03
- Q3
- 2.25
- Median
- 1.23
- EG
- 0.94
- Q1
- 0.85
- Min
- 0.07
MRSH
Insurance industry group
3.42
- Max
- 4.03
- MRSH
- 3.42
- Q3
- 2.25
- Median
- 1.23
- Q1
- 0.85
- Min
- 0.07
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Everest (EG) at 1.08 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile relative to book while Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 6.64 prices above its industry range — a wide valuation gap against assets.
EG
Insurance industry group
1.08
- Max
- 5.07
- Q3
- 2.79
- Median
- 1.76
- Q1
- 1.23
- EG
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.30
MRSH
Insurance industry group
6.64
- MRSH
- 6.64
- Max
- 5.07
- Q3
- 2.79
- Median
- 1.76
- Q1
- 1.23
- Min
- 0.30
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | EG | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 8.64 | 24.50 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.94 | 3.42 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.08 | 6.64 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |