TCOM vs. VIK: Trip.com vs. Viking Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Trip.com (TCOM) and Viking (VIK) are both classified in the Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines sub-industry within the broader Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Trip.com (TCOM) carries decades of public-market history since December 9, 2003, while Viking (VIK) listed on May 1, 2024 — long-window comparisons have far more historical data on the TCOM side.

Viking (VIK) trades as ordinary local shares, while Trip.com (TCOM) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Trip.com (TCOM) reports a negative beta of -0.04, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Viking (VIK) has a non-negative beta of 1.38.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Viking (VIK) at 139.62% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Trip.com (TCOM) at 15.65%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Trip.com (TCOM) at 36.91% keeps the most of each sales dollar — above its industry’s net margin range — and Viking (VIK) at 19.33% also retains a top-quartile share.

Trip.com (TCOM) reports a negative operating margin of -9.33%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Viking (VIK) reports 29.40%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Trip.com (TCOM) at 17.10% and Viking (VIK) at 21.89% sit in the top peer quartile for revenue growth, so each is growing its top line faster than typical industry peers.

Both companies show strong earnings momentum, but Viking (VIK) at 613.89% is the standout with EPS growth above its industry range; Trip.com (TCOM) at 92.37% also sits in the top quartile.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Both Trip.com (TCOM) at 1.33 and Viking (VIK) at 0.81 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

Trip.com (TCOM) at 0.17 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while Viking (VIK) at 3.75 sits in the higher-leverage quartile.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Neither Trip.com (TCOM) nor Viking (VIK) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Neither Trip.com (TCOM) nor Viking (VIK) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Trip.com (TCOM) at 8.95 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Viking (VIK) at 29.06 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for TCOM, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

Trip.com (TCOM) at 0.43 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while Viking (VIK) at 5.61 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.

Trip.com (TCOM) at 1.18 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Viking (VIK) at 24.05 prices above its benchmark range — VIK looks rich relative to book.

Valuation Metrics