R vs. ZTO: Ryder System vs. ZTO Express (Cayman) Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Ryder System (R) and ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) both fall under the Transportation industry group, but R is classified in Ground Transportation while ZTO is classified in Air Freight & Logistics.

Ryder System (R) trades as ordinary local shares, while ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) reports a negative beta of -0.18, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Ryder System (R) has a non-negative beta of 1.05.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Ryder System (R) at 17.20% and ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 16.28% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Both Ryder System (R) at 3.98% and ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 19.04% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Both Ryder System (R) at 9.50% and ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 22.19% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 10.88% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Ryder System (R) at -0.17% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for ZTO.

Both Ryder System (R) at 7.96% and ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 4.58% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 1.67 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Ryder System (R) at 0.67 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.

ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 0.35 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Ryder System (R) at 2.75 uses more debt funding than most peers.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Ryder System (R) at 1.38% pays an industry-typical yield; ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 12.89% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.

Both Ryder System (R) at 28.48% and ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 38.36% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both Ryder System (R) at 20.29 and ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 11.37 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 0.29 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Ryder System (R) at 0.78 prices around its industry’s middle — ZTO costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 1.66 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Ryder System (R) at 3.42 carries an above-peer premium to book — R is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics