PAC vs. R: Grupo Aeroportuario vs. Ryder System Stock Comparison
How do Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC) and Ryder System (R) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC) and Ryder System (R) both fall under the Transportation industry group, but PAC is classified in Transportation Infrastructure while R is classified in Ground Transportation.
Ryder System (R) trades as ordinary local shares, while Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | PAC | R |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico SAB de CV ADR | Ryder System Inc. |
| Country/Region | Mexico | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Transportation | Transportation |
| GICS Industry | Transportation Infrastructure | Ground Transportation |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Airport Services | Cargo Ground Transportation |
| Market Capitalization | 14.79 billion USD | 10.18 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 27, 2006 | January 2, 1980 |
| Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | PAC | R |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 8.96% | 66.06% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 26.61% | 43.22% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 14.97% | 29.10% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | PAC | R |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 34.08% | 32.86% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 1.05 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -42.83% | -27.39% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 139.78K | 294.17K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | PAC | R |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.14 | 1.88 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.19 | 3.07 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC) at 26.70% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Ryder System (R) at 17.20% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for PAC.
PAC
Transportation industry group
26.70%
- Max
- 45.08%
- PAC
- 26.70%
- Q3
- 22.02%
- Median
- 13.94%
- Q1
- 2.89%
- Min
- -10.45%
R
Transportation industry group
17.20%
- Max
- 45.08%
- Q3
- 22.02%
- R
- 17.20%
- Median
- 13.94%
- Q1
- 2.89%
- Min
- -10.45%
Net Margin (TTM)
Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC) at 29.51% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Ryder System (R) at 3.98%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
PAC
Transportation industry group
29.51%
- Max
- 50.36%
- PAC
- 29.51%
- Q3
- 21.18%
- Median
- 5.58%
- Q1
- 1.55%
- Min
- -11.37%
R
Transportation industry group
3.98%
- Max
- 50.36%
- Q3
- 21.18%
- Median
- 5.58%
- R
- 3.98%
- Q1
- 1.55%
- Min
- -11.37%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC) at 43.26% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Ryder System (R) at 9.50%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
PAC
Transportation industry group
43.26%
- Max
- 59.18%
- PAC
- 43.26%
- Q3
- 29.30%
- Median
- 11.50%
- Q1
- 4.62%
- Min
- -8.91%
R
Transportation industry group
9.50%
- Max
- 59.18%
- Q3
- 29.30%
- Median
- 11.50%
- R
- 9.50%
- Q1
- 4.62%
- Min
- -8.91%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | PAC | R |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 26.70% | 17.20% |
| ROA (TTM) | 10.48% | 4.01% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 29.51% | 3.98% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 43.26% | 9.50% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 79.05% | 19.60% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC) at 23.19% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Ryder System (R) at -0.17% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for PAC.
EPS Growth
Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC) at 12.68% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Ryder System (R) at 7.96% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for PAC.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | PAC | R |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 23.19% | -0.17% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 14.78% | 0.60% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 12.68% | 7.96% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 2.87% | -11.18% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC) at 0.79 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Ryder System (R) at 0.67 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for R.
PAC
Transportation industry group
0.79
- Max
- 2.58
- Q3
- 1.62
- Median
- 1.16
- PAC
- 0.79
- Q1
- 0.78
- Min
- 0.22
R
Transportation industry group
0.67
- Max
- 2.58
- Q3
- 1.62
- Median
- 1.16
- Q1
- 0.78
- R
- 0.67
- Min
- 0.22
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC) at 1.17 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Ryder System (R) at 2.75 uses more debt funding than most peers.
PAC
Transportation industry group
1.17
- Max
- 2.75
- Q3
- 1.37
- PAC
- 1.17
- Median
- 0.78
- Q1
- 0.35
- Min
- 0.00
R
Transportation industry group
2.75
- R
- 2.75
- Max
- 2.75
- Q3
- 1.37
- Median
- 0.78
- Q1
- 0.35
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | PAC | R |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.79 | 0.67 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.17 | 2.75 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.92 | 2.84 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Ryder System (R) at 1.38% pays an industry-typical yield; Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC) at 8.46% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.
PAC
Transportation industry group
8.46%
- PAC
- 8.46%
- Max
- 4.68%
- Q3
- 1.99%
- Median
- 0.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
R
Transportation industry group
1.38%
- Max
- 4.68%
- Q3
- 1.99%
- R
- 1.38%
- Median
- 0.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Ryder System (R) reports a payout of 28.48%, ranking against industry peers normally.
PAC
Transportation industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 100.89%
- Q3
- 41.68%
- Median
- 20.43%
- PAC
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
R
Transportation industry group
28.48%
- Max
- 100.89%
- Q3
- 41.68%
- R
- 28.48%
- Median
- 20.43%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | PAC | R |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 8.46% | 1.38% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 28.48% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC) at 21.16 and Ryder System (R) at 20.29 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
PAC
Transportation industry group
21.16
- Max
- 46.76
- Q3
- 30.87
- PAC
- 21.16
- Median
- 20.58
- Q1
- 10.44
- Min
- 0.00
R
Transportation industry group
20.29
- Max
- 46.76
- Q3
- 30.87
- Median
- 20.58
- R
- 20.29
- Q1
- 10.44
- Min
- 0.00
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC) at 0.42 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Ryder System (R) at 0.78 prices around its industry’s middle — PAC costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
PAC
Transportation industry group
0.42
- Max
- 4.35
- Q3
- 2.07
- Median
- 0.93
- Q1
- 0.53
- PAC
- 0.42
- Min
- 0.04
R
Transportation industry group
0.78
- Max
- 4.35
- Q3
- 2.07
- Median
- 0.93
- R
- 0.78
- Q1
- 0.53
- Min
- 0.04
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both look rich against book: Ryder System (R) at 3.42 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC) at 719.39 prices even higher, above its industry range.
PAC
Transportation industry group
719.39
- PAC
- 719.39
- Max
- 6.29
- Q3
- 3.39
- Median
- 1.90
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- -2.07
R
Transportation industry group
3.42
- Max
- 6.29
- R
- 3.42
- Q3
- 3.39
- Median
- 1.90
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- -2.07
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | PAC | R |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 21.16 | 20.29 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.42 | 0.78 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 719.39 | 3.42 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 76.79% | 15.08% |