FDXF vs. ZTO: FedEx Freight vs. ZTO Express (Cayman) Stock Comparison

Company Profile

FedEx Freight (FDXF) and ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) both fall under the Transportation industry group, but FDXF is classified in Ground Transportation while ZTO is classified in Air Freight & Logistics.

ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) has been public since October 27, 2016 with a meaningfully longer listed history, while FedEx Freight (FDXF) only listed on May 27, 2026 — long-window metrics on the FDXF side should be interpreted with caution.

FedEx Freight (FDXF) trades as ordinary local shares, while ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Both FedEx Freight (FDXF, beta -1.72) and ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO, beta -0.18) report negative betas, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is unusual for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise; treat both readings with caution.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both FDXF and ZTO need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

FedEx Freight (FDXF) at 69.09% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 16.28%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Both FedEx Freight (FDXF) at 7.45% and ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 19.04% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Both FedEx Freight (FDXF) at 14.66% and ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 22.19% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 10.88% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while FedEx Freight (FDXF) at -1.09% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for ZTO.

Both FedEx Freight (FDXF) at -51.34% and ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 4.58% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

FedEx Freight (FDXF) at 1.52 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 1.67 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

Only one side’s leverage can be read here: ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 0.35 against its industry range, while FedEx Freight (FDXF) reports no figure this period.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

FedEx Freight (FDXF) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) reports a yield of 12.89%, ranking against industry peers normally.

FedEx Freight (FDXF) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) reports a payout of 38.36%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 11.37 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while FedEx Freight (FDXF) at 36.23 sits in the richer quartile — FDXF needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 0.29 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while FedEx Freight (FDXF) at 2.10 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.

FedEx Freight (FDXF) reports a negative P/B ratio of -73.55, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) reports 1.66, ranking against industry peers normally.

Valuation Metrics