CHRW vs. ZTO: C.H. Robinson Worldwide vs. ZTO Express (Cayman) Stock Comparison

Company Profile

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) are both classified in the Air Freight & Logistics sub-industry within the broader Air Freight & Logistics industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) trades as ordinary local shares, while ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) reports a negative beta of -0.18, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) has a non-negative beta of 0.93.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 38.93% sits in the top ROE quartile, while ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 16.28% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CHRW.

Both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 3.67% and ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 19.04% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 5.66% and ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 22.19% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 10.88% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at -8.42% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 25.13% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 4.58% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for CHRW.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 1.34 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 1.67 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

Both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 1.36 and ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 0.35 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 1.96% pays an industry-typical yield; ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 12.89% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.

ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 38.36% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 45.24% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 22.50 and ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 11.37 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 0.29 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 0.80 prices around its industry’s middle — ZTO costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 1.66 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 9.20 prices above its benchmark range — CHRW looks rich relative to book.

Valuation Metrics