CHRW vs. UNP: C.H. Robinson Worldwide vs. Union Pacific Stock Comparison
How do C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Union Pacific (UNP) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Union Pacific (UNP) both fall under the Transportation industry group, but CHRW is classified in Air Freight & Logistics while UNP is classified in Ground Transportation.
| Profile Item | CHRW | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Name | C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc. | Union Pacific Corp. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Transportation | Transportation |
| GICS Industry | Air Freight & Logistics | Ground Transportation |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Air Freight & Logistics | Rail Transportation |
| Market Capitalization | 14.53 billion USD | 172.38 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | October 16, 1997 | January 2, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CHRW | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -12.63% | 36.74% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 19.75% | 14.66% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 8.87% | 6.62% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CHRW | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 43.97% | 23.12% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 0.84 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -40.55% | -31.83% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.72M | 2.49M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CHRW | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.38 | 1.40 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.47 | 2.22 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 38.93% and Union Pacific (UNP) at 38.75% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.
CHRW
Transportation industry group
38.93%
- Max
- 45.08%
- CHRW
- 38.93%
- Q3
- 22.02%
- Median
- 13.94%
- Q1
- 2.89%
- Min
- -10.45%
UNP
Transportation industry group
38.75%
- Max
- 45.08%
- UNP
- 38.75%
- Q3
- 22.02%
- Median
- 13.94%
- Q1
- 2.89%
- Min
- -10.45%
Net Margin (TTM)
Union Pacific (UNP) at 28.90% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 3.67%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
CHRW
Transportation industry group
3.67%
- Max
- 50.36%
- Q3
- 21.18%
- Median
- 5.58%
- CHRW
- 3.67%
- Q1
- 1.55%
- Min
- -11.37%
UNP
Transportation industry group
28.90%
- Max
- 50.36%
- UNP
- 28.90%
- Q3
- 21.18%
- Median
- 5.58%
- Q1
- 1.55%
- Min
- -11.37%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Union Pacific (UNP) at 41.34% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 5.66%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
CHRW
Transportation industry group
5.66%
- Max
- 59.18%
- Q3
- 29.30%
- Median
- 11.50%
- CHRW
- 5.66%
- Q1
- 4.62%
- Min
- -8.91%
UNP
Transportation industry group
41.34%
- Max
- 59.18%
- UNP
- 41.34%
- Q3
- 29.30%
- Median
- 11.50%
- Q1
- 4.62%
- Min
- -8.91%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CHRW | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 38.93% | 38.75% |
| ROA (TTM) | 10.34% | 9.51% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 3.67% | 28.90% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 5.66% | 41.34% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 8.34% | 55.77% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Union Pacific (UNP) at 1.07% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at -8.42% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 25.13% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Union Pacific (UNP) at 8.03% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for CHRW.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CHRW | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -8.42% | 1.07% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -13.05% | -0.49% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 25.13% | 8.03% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -13.26% | 2.24% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 1.34 and Union Pacific (UNP) at 1.16 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
CHRW
Transportation industry group
1.34
- Max
- 2.58
- Q3
- 1.62
- CHRW
- 1.34
- Median
- 1.16
- Q1
- 0.78
- Min
- 0.22
UNP
Transportation industry group
1.16
- Max
- 2.58
- Q3
- 1.62
- Median
- 1.16
- UNP
- 1.16
- Q1
- 0.78
- Min
- 0.22
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 1.36 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Union Pacific (UNP) at 1.41 uses more debt funding than most peers.
CHRW
Transportation industry group
1.36
- Max
- 2.75
- Q3
- 1.37
- CHRW
- 1.36
- Median
- 0.78
- Q1
- 0.35
- Min
- 0.00
UNP
Transportation industry group
1.41
- Max
- 2.75
- UNP
- 1.41
- Q3
- 1.37
- Median
- 0.78
- Q1
- 0.35
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CHRW | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.34 | 1.16 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.36 | 1.41 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.95 | 2.11 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 1.96% and Union Pacific (UNP) at 1.87% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
CHRW
Transportation industry group
1.96%
- Max
- 4.68%
- Q3
- 1.99%
- CHRW
- 1.96%
- Median
- 0.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
UNP
Transportation industry group
1.87%
- Max
- 4.68%
- Q3
- 1.99%
- UNP
- 1.87%
- Median
- 0.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 45.24% and Union Pacific (UNP) at 43.37% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.
CHRW
Transportation industry group
45.24%
- Max
- 100.89%
- CHRW
- 45.24%
- Q3
- 41.68%
- Median
- 20.43%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
UNP
Transportation industry group
43.37%
- Max
- 100.89%
- UNP
- 43.37%
- Q3
- 41.68%
- Median
- 20.43%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CHRW | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.96% | 1.87% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 45.24% | 43.37% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 22.50 and Union Pacific (UNP) at 22.63 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CHRW
Transportation industry group
22.50
- Max
- 46.76
- Q3
- 30.87
- CHRW
- 22.50
- Median
- 20.58
- Q1
- 10.44
- Min
- 0.00
UNP
Transportation industry group
22.63
- Max
- 46.76
- Q3
- 30.87
- UNP
- 22.63
- Median
- 20.58
- Q1
- 10.44
- Min
- 0.00
P/S Ratio (TTM)
C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 0.80 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Union Pacific (UNP) at 6.54 clears its benchmark range — UNP looks notably rich on sales.
CHRW
Transportation industry group
0.80
- Max
- 4.35
- Q3
- 2.07
- Median
- 0.93
- CHRW
- 0.80
- Q1
- 0.53
- Min
- 0.04
UNP
Transportation industry group
6.54
- UNP
- 6.54
- Max
- 4.35
- Q3
- 2.07
- Median
- 0.93
- Q1
- 0.53
- Min
- 0.04
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Measured against book value, both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 9.20 and Union Pacific (UNP) at 7.83 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.
CHRW
Transportation industry group
9.20
- CHRW
- 9.20
- Max
- 6.29
- Q3
- 3.39
- Median
- 1.90
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- -2.07
UNP
Transportation industry group
7.83
- UNP
- 7.83
- Max
- 6.29
- Q3
- 3.39
- Median
- 1.90
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- -2.07
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CHRW | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 22.50 | 22.63 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.80 | 6.54 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 9.20 | 7.83 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.61% | 2.94% |