CHRW vs. UBER: C.H. Robinson Worldwide vs. Uber Stock Comparison
How do C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Uber (UBER) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Uber (UBER) both fall under the Transportation industry group, but CHRW is classified in Air Freight & Logistics while UBER is classified in Ground Transportation.
| Profile Item | CHRW | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Name | C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc. | Uber Technologies Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Transportation | Transportation |
| GICS Industry | Air Freight & Logistics | Ground Transportation |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Air Freight & Logistics | Passenger Ground Transportation |
| Market Capitalization | 14.53 billion USD | 140.05 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | October 16, 1997 | May 10, 2019 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CHRW | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -12.63% | -23.08% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 19.75% | 12.23% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 8.87% | 9.23% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CHRW | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 43.97% | 35.25% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 1.27 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -40.55% | -55.29% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.72M | 17.48M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CHRW | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.38 | -0.78 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.47 | -1.12 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 38.93% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Uber (UBER) at 12.33% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CHRW.
CHRW
Transportation industry group
38.93%
- Max
- 45.08%
- CHRW
- 38.93%
- Q3
- 22.02%
- Median
- 13.94%
- Q1
- 2.89%
- Min
- -10.45%
UBER
Transportation industry group
12.33%
- Max
- 45.08%
- Q3
- 22.02%
- Median
- 13.94%
- UBER
- 12.33%
- Q1
- 2.89%
- Min
- -10.45%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 3.67% and Uber (UBER) at 6.13% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CHRW
Transportation industry group
3.67%
- Max
- 50.36%
- Q3
- 21.18%
- Median
- 5.58%
- CHRW
- 3.67%
- Q1
- 1.55%
- Min
- -11.37%
UBER
Transportation industry group
6.13%
- Max
- 50.36%
- Q3
- 21.18%
- UBER
- 6.13%
- Median
- 5.58%
- Q1
- 1.55%
- Min
- -11.37%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 5.66% and Uber (UBER) at 9.80% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CHRW
Transportation industry group
5.66%
- Max
- 59.18%
- Q3
- 29.30%
- Median
- 11.50%
- CHRW
- 5.66%
- Q1
- 4.62%
- Min
- -8.91%
UBER
Transportation industry group
9.80%
- Max
- 59.18%
- Q3
- 29.30%
- Median
- 11.50%
- UBER
- 9.80%
- Q1
- 4.62%
- Min
- -8.91%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CHRW | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 38.93% | 12.33% |
| ROA (TTM) | 10.34% | 6.54% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 3.67% | 6.13% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 5.66% | 9.80% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 8.34% | 41.44% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Uber (UBER) at 18.28% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at -8.42% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.
EPS Growth
C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 25.13% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Uber (UBER) at 3.73% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for CHRW.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CHRW | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -8.42% | 18.28% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -13.05% | 17.73% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 25.13% | 3.73% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -13.26% | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 1.34 and Uber (UBER) at 1.23 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
CHRW
Transportation industry group
1.34
- Max
- 2.58
- Q3
- 1.62
- CHRW
- 1.34
- Median
- 1.16
- Q1
- 0.78
- Min
- 0.22
UBER
Transportation industry group
1.23
- Max
- 2.58
- Q3
- 1.62
- UBER
- 1.23
- Median
- 1.16
- Q1
- 0.78
- Min
- 0.22
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 1.36 and Uber (UBER) at 0.61 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
CHRW
Transportation industry group
1.36
- Max
- 2.75
- Q3
- 1.37
- CHRW
- 1.36
- Median
- 0.78
- Q1
- 0.35
- Min
- 0.00
UBER
Transportation industry group
0.61
- Max
- 2.75
- Q3
- 1.37
- Median
- 0.78
- UBER
- 0.61
- Q1
- 0.35
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CHRW | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.34 | 1.23 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.36 | 0.61 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.95 | 0.98 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Uber (UBER) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) reports a yield of 1.96%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CHRW
Transportation industry group
1.96%
- Max
- 4.68%
- Q3
- 1.99%
- CHRW
- 1.96%
- Median
- 0.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
UBER
Transportation industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 4.68%
- Q3
- 1.99%
- Median
- 0.74%
- UBER
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Uber (UBER) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) reports a payout of 45.24%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CHRW
Transportation industry group
45.24%
- Max
- 100.89%
- CHRW
- 45.24%
- Q3
- 41.68%
- Median
- 20.43%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
UBER
Transportation industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 100.89%
- Q3
- 41.68%
- Median
- 20.43%
- UBER
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CHRW | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.96% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 45.24% | 0.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 22.50 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Uber (UBER) at 40.35 sits in the richer quartile — UBER needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
CHRW
Transportation industry group
22.50
- Max
- 46.76
- Q3
- 30.87
- CHRW
- 22.50
- Median
- 20.58
- Q1
- 10.44
- Min
- 0.00
UBER
Transportation industry group
40.35
- Max
- 46.76
- UBER
- 40.35
- Q3
- 30.87
- Median
- 20.58
- Q1
- 10.44
- Min
- 0.00
P/S Ratio (TTM)
C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 0.80 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Uber (UBER) at 2.48 sits in the pricier quartile — UBER costs more per dollar of sales.
CHRW
Transportation industry group
0.80
- Max
- 4.35
- Q3
- 2.07
- Median
- 0.93
- CHRW
- 0.80
- Q1
- 0.53
- Min
- 0.04
UBER
Transportation industry group
2.48
- Max
- 4.35
- UBER
- 2.48
- Q3
- 2.07
- Median
- 0.93
- Q1
- 0.53
- Min
- 0.04
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both look rich against book: Uber (UBER) at 5.06 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 9.20 prices even higher, above its industry range.
CHRW
Transportation industry group
9.20
- CHRW
- 9.20
- Max
- 6.29
- Q3
- 3.39
- Median
- 1.90
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- -2.07
UBER
Transportation industry group
5.06
- Max
- 6.29
- UBER
- 5.06
- Q3
- 3.39
- Median
- 1.90
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- -2.07
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CHRW | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 22.50 | 40.35 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.80 | 2.48 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 9.20 | 5.06 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.61% | 5.29% |