CHRW vs. R: C.H. Robinson Worldwide vs. Ryder System Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Ryder System (R) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Ryder System (R) both fall under the Transportation industry group, but CHRW is classified in Air Freight & Logistics while R is classified in Ground Transportation.

Company profile comparison for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Ryder System (R)
Profile Item	CHRW	R
Name	C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc.	Ryder System Inc.
Country/Region	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry Group	Transportation	Transportation
GICS Industry	Air Freight & Logistics	Ground Transportation
GICS Sub-Industry	Air Freight & Logistics	Cargo Ground Transportation
Market Capitalization	14.53 billion USD	10.18 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	Nasdaq	NYSE
Listing Date	October 16, 1997	January 2, 1980
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CHRW

GSPC

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Ryder System (R), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Ryder System (R). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Ryder System (R). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Ryder System (R)
Metric	CHRW	R
Total Return (1Y)	-12.63%	66.06%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	19.75%	43.22%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	8.87%	29.10%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CHRW

GSPC

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Ryder System (R), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Ryder System (R). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Ryder System (R)
Metric	CHRW	R
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	43.97%	32.86%
Beta (5Y)	0.93	1.05
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-40.55%	-27.39%
Avg. Volume (3M)	1.72M	294.17K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

CHRW and R are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Ryder System (R)
Metric	CHRW	R
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	-0.38	1.88
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	-0.47	3.07

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 38.93% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Ryder System (R) at 17.20% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CHRW.

CHRW

Transportation industry group

38.93%

Max: 45.08%
CHRW: 38.93%
Q3: 22.02%
Median: 13.94%
Q1: 2.89%
Min: -10.45%

R

Transportation industry group

17.20%

Max: 45.08%
Q3: 22.02%
R: 17.20%
Median: 13.94%
Q1: 2.89%
Min: -10.45%

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Ryder System (R): A comparison of their ROE against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 3.67% and Ryder System (R) at 3.98% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

CHRW

Transportation industry group

3.67%

Max: 50.36%
Q3: 21.18%
Median: 5.58%
CHRW: 3.67%
Q1: 1.55%
Min: -11.37%

R

Transportation industry group

3.98%

Max: 50.36%
Q3: 21.18%
Median: 5.58%
R: 3.98%
Q1: 1.55%
Min: -11.37%

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Ryder System (R): A comparison of their net margin against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 5.66% and Ryder System (R) at 9.50% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

CHRW

Transportation industry group

5.66%

Max: 59.18%
Q3: 29.30%
Median: 11.50%
CHRW: 5.66%
Q1: 4.62%
Min: -8.91%

R

Transportation industry group

9.50%

Max: 59.18%
Q3: 29.30%
Median: 11.50%
R: 9.50%
Q1: 4.62%
Min: -8.91%

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Ryder System (R): A comparison of their operating margin against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Ryder System (R)
Metric	CHRW	R
ROE (TTM)	38.93%	17.20%
ROA (TTM)	10.34%	4.01%
Net Margin (TTM)	3.67%	3.98%
Operating Margin (TTM)	5.66%	9.50%
Gross Margin (TTM)	8.34%	19.60%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Ryder System (R) at -0.17% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at -8.42% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Ryder System (R): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 25.13% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Ryder System (R) at 7.96% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for CHRW.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Ryder System (R): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Ryder System (R)
Metric	CHRW	R
Revenue Growth (YoY)	-8.42%	-0.17%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	-13.05%	0.60%
EPS Growth (YoY)	25.13%	7.96%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	-13.26%	-11.18%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 1.34 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Ryder System (R) at 0.67 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for R.

CHRW

Transportation industry group

1.34

Max: 2.58
Q3: 1.62
CHRW: 1.34
Median: 1.16
Q1: 0.78
Min: 0.22

R

Transportation industry group

0.67

Max: 2.58
Q3: 1.62
Median: 1.16
Q1: 0.78
R: 0.67
Min: 0.22

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Ryder System (R): A comparison of their current ratio against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 1.36 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Ryder System (R) at 2.75 uses more debt funding than most peers.

CHRW

Transportation industry group

1.36

Max: 2.75
Q3: 1.37
CHRW: 1.36
Median: 0.78
Q1: 0.35
Min: 0.00

R

Transportation industry group

2.75

R: 2.75
Max: 2.75
Q3: 1.37
Median: 0.78
Q1: 0.35
Min: 0.00

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Ryder System (R): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Ryder System (R)
Metric	CHRW	R
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.34	0.67
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	1.36	2.75
Net Debt / EBITDA	1.95	2.84

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 1.96% and Ryder System (R) at 1.38% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

CHRW

Transportation industry group

1.96%

Max: 4.68%
Q3: 1.99%
CHRW: 1.96%
Median: 0.74%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

R

Transportation industry group

1.38%

Max: 4.68%
Q3: 1.99%
R: 1.38%
Median: 0.74%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Ryder System (R): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Ryder System (R) at 28.48% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 45.24% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

CHRW

Transportation industry group

45.24%

Max: 100.89%
CHRW: 45.24%
Q3: 41.68%
Median: 20.43%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

R

Transportation industry group

28.48%

Max: 100.89%
Q3: 41.68%
R: 28.48%
Median: 20.43%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Ryder System (R): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Ryder System (R)
Metric	CHRW	R
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.96%	1.38%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	45.24%	28.48%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 22.50 and Ryder System (R) at 20.29 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

CHRW

Transportation industry group

22.50

Max: 46.76
Q3: 30.87
CHRW: 22.50
Median: 20.58
Q1: 10.44
Min: 0.00

R

Transportation industry group

20.29

Max: 46.76
Q3: 30.87
Median: 20.58
R: 20.29
Q1: 10.44
Min: 0.00

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Ryder System (R): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 0.80 and Ryder System (R) at 0.78 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

CHRW

Transportation industry group

0.80

Max: 4.35
Q3: 2.07
Median: 0.93
CHRW: 0.80
Q1: 0.53
Min: 0.04

R

Transportation industry group

0.78

Max: 4.35
Q3: 2.07
Median: 0.93
R: 0.78
Q1: 0.53
Min: 0.04

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Ryder System (R): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Both look rich against book: Ryder System (R) at 3.42 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 9.20 prices even higher, above its industry range.

CHRW

Transportation industry group

9.20

CHRW: 9.20
Max: 6.29
Q3: 3.39
Median: 1.90
Q1: 1.03
Min: -2.07

R

Transportation industry group

3.42

Max: 6.29
R: 3.42
Q3: 3.39
Median: 1.90
Q1: 1.03
Min: -2.07

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Ryder System (R): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Ryder System (R)
Metric	CHRW	R
P/E Ratio (TTM)	22.50	20.29
P/S Ratio (TTM)	0.80	0.78
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	9.20	3.42
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	2.61%	15.08%