VIK vs. YUMC: Viking vs. Yum China Stock Comparison
How do Viking (VIK) and Yum China (YUMC) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Viking (VIK) and Yum China (YUMC) both belong to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, though VIK is classified under Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines while YUMC falls under Restaurants.
Yum China (YUMC) has been public since October 17, 2016, giving it a longer listed trading history, while Viking (VIK) listed on May 1, 2024 and still has a shorter public-market record.
| Profile Item | VIK | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Viking Holdings Ltd. | Yum China Holdings, Inc. |
| Country/Region | Bermuda | China |
| GICS Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| GICS Industry Group | Consumer Services | Consumer Services |
| GICS Industry | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines | Restaurants |
| Market Capitalization | 39.07 billion USD | 16.79 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | May 1, 2024 | October 17, 2016 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | VIK | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 49.03% | 17.02% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -- | 6.80% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -- | -0.60% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Viking (VIK) has an aggressive beta of 1.38, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Yum China (YUMC) is defensive at 0.01 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | VIK | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 41.04% | 25.40% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.38 | 0.01 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -35.39% | -53.84% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 3.95M | 1.59M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | VIK | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.09 | 0.50 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.71 | 0.77 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Viking (VIK) at 139.62% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Yum China (YUMC) at 17.35%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
VIK
Consumer Services industry group
139.62%
- VIK
- 139.62%
- Max
- 76.75%
- Q3
- 34.07%
- Median
- 15.90%
- Q1
- 3.23%
- Min
- -40.61%
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
17.35%
- Max
- 76.75%
- Q3
- 34.07%
- YUMC
- 17.35%
- Median
- 15.90%
- Q1
- 3.23%
- Min
- -40.61%
Net Margin (TTM)
Viking (VIK) at 19.33% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Yum China (YUMC) at 7.90%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
VIK
Consumer Services industry group
19.33%
- Max
- 25.52%
- VIK
- 19.33%
- Q3
- 12.95%
- Median
- 6.63%
- Q1
- 1.46%
- Min
- -14.36%
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
7.90%
- Max
- 25.52%
- Q3
- 12.95%
- YUMC
- 7.90%
- Median
- 6.63%
- Q1
- 1.46%
- Min
- -14.36%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Viking (VIK) at 29.40% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Yum China (YUMC) at 13.09%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
VIK
Consumer Services industry group
29.40%
- Max
- 49.05%
- VIK
- 29.40%
- Q3
- 24.35%
- Median
- 14.23%
- Q1
- 5.67%
- Min
- -16.47%
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
13.09%
- Max
- 49.05%
- Q3
- 24.35%
- Median
- 14.23%
- YUMC
- 13.09%
- Q1
- 5.67%
- Min
- -16.47%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | VIK | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 139.62% | 17.35% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.14% | 7.81% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 19.33% | 7.90% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 29.40% | 13.09% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 44.28% | 20.45% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Viking (VIK) at 21.89% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Yum China (YUMC) at 4.37% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for VIK.
EPS Growth
Viking (VIK) at 613.89% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Yum China (YUMC) at 7.73%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | VIK | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 21.89% | 4.37% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 26.97% | 7.23% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 613.89% | 7.73% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 34.14% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Viking (VIK) at 0.81 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Yum China (YUMC) at 0.67 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for YUMC.
VIK
Consumer Services industry group
0.81
- Max
- 3.41
- Q3
- 1.85
- Median
- 1.06
- VIK
- 0.81
- Q1
- 0.72
- Min
- 0.22
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
0.67
- Max
- 3.41
- Q3
- 1.85
- Median
- 1.06
- Q1
- 0.72
- YUMC
- 0.67
- Min
- 0.22
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Yum China (YUMC) at 0.54 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Viking (VIK) at 3.75 uses more debt funding than most peers.
VIK
Consumer Services industry group
3.75
- Max
- 6.12
- VIK
- 3.75
- Q3
- 2.93
- Median
- 1.29
- Q1
- 0.37
- Min
- 0.01
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
0.54
- Max
- 6.12
- Q3
- 2.93
- Median
- 1.29
- YUMC
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.37
- Min
- 0.01
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | VIK | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.81 | 0.67 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 3.75 | 0.54 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.15 | 0.85 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Viking (VIK) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Yum China (YUMC) reports a yield of 2.23%, ranking against industry peers normally.
VIK
Consumer Services industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 4.10%
- Q3
- 1.82%
- VIK
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
2.23%
- Max
- 4.10%
- YUMC
- 2.23%
- Q3
- 1.82%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Viking (VIK) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Yum China (YUMC) reports a payout of 38.54%, ranking against industry peers normally.
VIK
Consumer Services industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 89.80%
- Q3
- 36.83%
- VIK
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
38.54%
- Max
- 89.80%
- YUMC
- 38.54%
- Q3
- 36.83%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | VIK | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 2.23% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 38.54% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Viking (VIK) at 29.06 and Yum China (YUMC) at 17.34 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
VIK
Consumer Services industry group
29.06
- Max
- 71.70
- Q3
- 37.12
- VIK
- 29.06
- Median
- 21.88
- Q1
- 13.00
- Min
- 5.72
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
17.34
- Max
- 71.70
- Q3
- 37.12
- Median
- 21.88
- YUMC
- 17.34
- Q1
- 13.00
- Min
- 5.72
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Yum China (YUMC) at 1.32 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Viking (VIK) at 5.61 sits in the pricier quartile — VIK costs more per dollar of sales.
VIK
Consumer Services industry group
5.61
- Max
- 6.40
- VIK
- 5.61
- Q3
- 3.01
- Median
- 1.54
- Q1
- 0.74
- Min
- 0.08
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
1.32
- Max
- 6.40
- Q3
- 3.01
- Median
- 1.54
- YUMC
- 1.32
- Q1
- 0.74
- Min
- 0.08
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Yum China (YUMC) at 3.19 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Viking (VIK) at 24.05 prices above its benchmark range — VIK looks rich relative to book.
VIK
Consumer Services industry group
24.05
- VIK
- 24.05
- Max
- 12.02
- Q3
- 5.58
- Median
- 2.37
- Q1
- 1.09
- Min
- -4.51
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
3.19
- Max
- 12.02
- Q3
- 5.58
- YUMC
- 3.19
- Median
- 2.37
- Q1
- 1.09
- Min
- -4.51
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | VIK | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 29.06 | 17.34 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 5.61 | 1.32 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 24.05 | 3.19 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 1.04% | -2.30% |