BKNG vs. YUMC: Booking vs. Yum China Stock Comparison
How do Booking (BKNG) and Yum China (YUMC) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Booking (BKNG) and Yum China (YUMC) both belong to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, though BKNG is classified under Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines while YUMC falls under Restaurants.
| Profile Item | BKNG | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Booking Holdings Inc. | Yum China Holdings, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | China |
| GICS Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| GICS Industry Group | Consumer Services | Consumer Services |
| GICS Industry | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines | Restaurants |
| Market Capitalization | 119.49 billion USD | 16.79 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 31, 1999 | October 17, 2016 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | BKNG | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -17.04% | 17.02% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 11.36% | 6.80% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 9.44% | -0.60% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | BKNG | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 39.63% | 25.40% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.11 | 0.01 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -39.53% | -53.84% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 7.18M | 1.59M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | BKNG | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.54 | 0.50 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.78 | 0.77 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Yum China (YUMC) earns 17.35% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Booking (BKNG) has no ROE this period.
BKNG
Consumer Services industry group
--
- Max
- 76.75%
- Q3
- 34.07%
- Median
- 15.90%
- Q1
- 3.23%
- Min
- -40.61%
- BKNG
- --
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
17.35%
- Max
- 76.75%
- Q3
- 34.07%
- YUMC
- 17.35%
- Median
- 15.90%
- Q1
- 3.23%
- Min
- -40.61%
Net Margin (TTM)
Booking (BKNG) at 25.52% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Yum China (YUMC) at 7.90%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
BKNG
Consumer Services industry group
25.52%
- BKNG
- 25.52%
- Max
- 25.52%
- Q3
- 12.95%
- Median
- 6.63%
- Q1
- 1.46%
- Min
- -14.36%
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
7.90%
- Max
- 25.52%
- Q3
- 12.95%
- YUMC
- 7.90%
- Median
- 6.63%
- Q1
- 1.46%
- Min
- -14.36%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Booking (BKNG) at 38.69% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Yum China (YUMC) at 13.09%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
BKNG
Consumer Services industry group
38.69%
- Max
- 49.05%
- BKNG
- 38.69%
- Q3
- 24.35%
- Median
- 14.23%
- Q1
- 5.67%
- Min
- -16.47%
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
13.09%
- Max
- 49.05%
- Q3
- 24.35%
- Median
- 14.23%
- YUMC
- 13.09%
- Q1
- 5.67%
- Min
- -16.47%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | BKNG | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | -- | 17.35% |
| ROA (TTM) | 20.25% | 7.81% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 25.52% | 7.90% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 38.69% | 13.09% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 87.18% | 20.45% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Booking (BKNG) at 13.39% and Yum China (YUMC) at 4.37% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Booking (BKNG) at -4.12% and Yum China (YUMC) at 7.73% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | BKNG | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 13.39% | 4.37% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 16.35% | 7.23% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -4.12% | 7.73% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 29.44% | 34.14% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Booking (BKNG) at 1.12 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Yum China (YUMC) at 0.67 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for YUMC.
BKNG
Consumer Services industry group
1.12
- Max
- 3.41
- Q3
- 1.85
- BKNG
- 1.12
- Median
- 1.06
- Q1
- 0.72
- Min
- 0.22
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
0.67
- Max
- 3.41
- Q3
- 1.85
- Median
- 1.06
- Q1
- 0.72
- YUMC
- 0.67
- Min
- 0.22
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Only one side’s leverage can be read here: Yum China (YUMC) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 0.54 against its industry range, while Booking (BKNG) reports no figure this period.
BKNG
Consumer Services industry group
--
- Max
- 6.12
- Q3
- 2.93
- Median
- 1.29
- Q1
- 0.37
- Min
- 0.01
- BKNG
- --
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
0.54
- Max
- 6.12
- Q3
- 2.93
- Median
- 1.29
- YUMC
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.37
- Min
- 0.01
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | BKNG | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.12 | 0.67 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | 0.54 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.56 | 0.85 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Yum China (YUMC) at 2.23% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Booking (BKNG) at 0.98% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, YUMC the richer one.
BKNG
Consumer Services industry group
0.98%
- Max
- 4.10%
- Q3
- 1.82%
- BKNG
- 0.98%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
2.23%
- Max
- 4.10%
- YUMC
- 2.23%
- Q3
- 1.82%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Booking (BKNG) at 17.84% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Yum China (YUMC) at 38.54% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
BKNG
Consumer Services industry group
17.84%
- Max
- 89.80%
- Q3
- 36.83%
- BKNG
- 17.84%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
38.54%
- Max
- 89.80%
- YUMC
- 38.54%
- Q3
- 36.83%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | BKNG | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.98% | 2.23% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 17.84% | 38.54% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Booking (BKNG) at 17.43 and Yum China (YUMC) at 17.34 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
BKNG
Consumer Services industry group
17.43
- Max
- 71.70
- Q3
- 37.12
- Median
- 21.88
- BKNG
- 17.43
- Q1
- 13.00
- Min
- 5.72
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
17.34
- Max
- 71.70
- Q3
- 37.12
- Median
- 21.88
- YUMC
- 17.34
- Q1
- 13.00
- Min
- 5.72
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Yum China (YUMC) at 1.32 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Booking (BKNG) at 4.25 sits in the pricier quartile — BKNG costs more per dollar of sales.
BKNG
Consumer Services industry group
4.25
- Max
- 6.40
- BKNG
- 4.25
- Q3
- 3.01
- Median
- 1.54
- Q1
- 0.74
- Min
- 0.08
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
1.32
- Max
- 6.40
- Q3
- 3.01
- Median
- 1.54
- YUMC
- 1.32
- Q1
- 0.74
- Min
- 0.08
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Booking (BKNG) reports a negative P/B ratio of -11.52, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile Yum China (YUMC) reports 3.19, ranking against industry peers normally.
BKNG
Consumer Services industry group
-11.52
- Max
- 12.02
- Q3
- 5.58
- Median
- 2.37
- Q1
- 1.09
- Min
- -4.51
- BKNG
- -11.52
YUMC
Consumer Services industry group
3.19
- Max
- 12.02
- Q3
- 5.58
- YUMC
- 3.19
- Median
- 2.37
- Q1
- 1.09
- Min
- -4.51
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BKNG | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 17.43 | 17.34 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 4.25 | 1.32 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | -11.52 | 3.19 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 6.37% | -2.30% |