CHRW vs. GRAB: C.H. Robinson Worldwide vs. Grab Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Grab (GRAB) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Grab (GRAB) both fall under the Transportation industry group, but CHRW is classified in Air Freight & Logistics while GRAB is classified in Ground Transportation.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) has more than two decades of public-market history since October 16, 1997, whereas Grab (GRAB) listed on December 1, 2020 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Company profile comparison for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Grab (GRAB)
Profile Item	CHRW	GRAB
Name	C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc.	Grab Holdings Ltd. Class A
Country/Region	United States	Singapore
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry Group	Transportation	Transportation
GICS Industry	Air Freight & Logistics	Ground Transportation
GICS Sub-Industry	Air Freight & Logistics	Passenger Ground Transportation
Market Capitalization	14.53 billion USD	13.77 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	Nasdaq	Nasdaq
Listing Date	October 16, 1997	December 1, 2020
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CHRW

GRAB

GSPC

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Grab (GRAB), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Grab (GRAB). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Grab (GRAB). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Grab (GRAB)
Metric	CHRW	GRAB
Total Return (1Y)	-12.63%	-38.94%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	19.75%	1.05%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	8.87%	-26.29%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CHRW

GRAB

GSPC

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Grab (GRAB), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Grab (GRAB). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Grab (GRAB)
Metric	CHRW	GRAB
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	43.97%	39.77%
Beta (5Y)	0.93	0.74
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-40.55%	-86.46%
Avg. Volume (3M)	1.72M	61.91M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

CHRW and GRAB are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Grab (GRAB)
Metric	CHRW	GRAB
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	-0.38	-1.09
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	-0.47	-1.55

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 38.93% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Grab (GRAB) at 7.64% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CHRW.

CHRW

Transportation industry group

38.93%

Max: 45.08%
CHRW: 38.93%
Q3: 22.02%
Median: 13.94%
Q1: 2.89%
Min: -10.45%

GRAB

Transportation industry group

7.64%

Max: 45.08%
Q3: 22.02%
Median: 13.94%
GRAB: 7.64%
Q1: 2.89%
Min: -10.45%

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Grab (GRAB): A comparison of their ROE against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 3.67% and Grab (GRAB) at 14.79% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

CHRW

Transportation industry group

3.67%

Max: 50.36%
Q3: 21.18%
Median: 5.58%
CHRW: 3.67%
Q1: 1.55%
Min: -11.37%

GRAB

Transportation industry group

14.79%

Max: 50.36%
Q3: 21.18%
GRAB: 14.79%
Median: 5.58%
Q1: 1.55%
Min: -11.37%

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Grab (GRAB): A comparison of their net margin against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 5.66% and Grab (GRAB) at 10.07% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

CHRW

Transportation industry group

5.66%

Max: 59.18%
Q3: 29.30%
Median: 11.50%
CHRW: 5.66%
Q1: 4.62%
Min: -8.91%

GRAB

Transportation industry group

10.07%

Max: 59.18%
Q3: 29.30%
Median: 11.50%
GRAB: 10.07%
Q1: 4.62%
Min: -8.91%

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Grab (GRAB): A comparison of their operating margin against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Grab (GRAB)
Metric	CHRW	GRAB
ROE (TTM)	38.93%	7.64%
ROA (TTM)	10.34%	1.08%
Net Margin (TTM)	3.67%	14.79%
Operating Margin (TTM)	5.66%	10.07%
Gross Margin (TTM)	8.34%	41.44%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Grab (GRAB) at 20.49% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at -8.42% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Grab (GRAB): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Only one side can be read here: C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) reports EPS growth of 25.13%, ranked against its industry; Grab (GRAB) has no EPS growth figure this period.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Grab (GRAB): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Grab (GRAB)
Metric	CHRW	GRAB
Revenue Growth (YoY)	-8.42%	20.49%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	-13.05%	32.98%
EPS Growth (YoY)	25.13%	--
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	-13.26%	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 1.34 and Grab (GRAB) at 1.38 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

CHRW

Transportation industry group

1.34

Max: 2.58
Q3: 1.62
CHRW: 1.34
Median: 1.16
Q1: 0.78
Min: 0.22

GRAB

Transportation industry group

1.38

Max: 2.58
Q3: 1.62
GRAB: 1.38
Median: 1.16
Q1: 0.78
Min: 0.22

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Grab (GRAB): A comparison of their current ratio against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Grab (GRAB) at 0.29 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 1.36 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

CHRW

Transportation industry group

1.36

Max: 2.75
Q3: 1.37
CHRW: 1.36
Median: 0.78
Q1: 0.35
Min: 0.00

GRAB

Transportation industry group

0.29

Max: 2.75
Q3: 1.37
Median: 0.78
Q1: 0.35
GRAB: 0.29
Min: 0.00

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Grab (GRAB): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Grab (GRAB)
Metric	CHRW	GRAB
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.34	1.38
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	1.36	0.29
Net Debt / EBITDA	1.95	-8.58

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Grab (GRAB) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) reports a yield of 1.96%, ranking against industry peers normally.

CHRW

Transportation industry group

1.96%

Max: 4.68%
Q3: 1.99%
CHRW: 1.96%
Median: 0.74%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

GRAB

Transportation industry group

0.00%

Max: 4.68%
Q3: 1.99%
Median: 0.74%
GRAB: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Grab (GRAB): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Grab (GRAB) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) reports a payout of 45.24%, ranking against industry peers normally.

CHRW

Transportation industry group

45.24%

Max: 100.89%
CHRW: 45.24%
Q3: 41.68%
Median: 20.43%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

GRAB

Transportation industry group

0.00%

Max: 100.89%
Q3: 41.68%
Median: 20.43%
GRAB: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Grab (GRAB): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Grab (GRAB)
Metric	CHRW	GRAB
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.96%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	45.24%	0.00%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 22.50 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Grab (GRAB) at 34.10 sits in the richer quartile — GRAB needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

CHRW

Transportation industry group

22.50

Max: 46.76
Q3: 30.87
CHRW: 22.50
Median: 20.58
Q1: 10.44
Min: 0.00

GRAB

Transportation industry group

34.10

Max: 46.76
GRAB: 34.10
Q3: 30.87
Median: 20.58
Q1: 10.44
Min: 0.00

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Grab (GRAB): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 0.80 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Grab (GRAB) at 3.47 sits in the pricier quartile — GRAB costs more per dollar of sales.

CHRW

Transportation industry group

0.80

Max: 4.35
Q3: 2.07
Median: 0.93
CHRW: 0.80
Q1: 0.53
Min: 0.04

GRAB

Transportation industry group

3.47

Max: 4.35
GRAB: 3.47
Q3: 2.07
Median: 0.93
Q1: 0.53
Min: 0.04

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Grab (GRAB): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Grab (GRAB) at 2.04 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 9.20 prices above its benchmark range — CHRW looks rich relative to book.

CHRW

Transportation industry group

9.20

CHRW: 9.20
Max: 6.29
Q3: 3.39
Median: 1.90
Q1: 1.03
Min: -2.07

GRAB

Transportation industry group

2.04

Max: 6.29
Q3: 3.39
GRAB: 2.04
Median: 1.90
Q1: 1.03
Min: -2.07

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Grab (GRAB): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Grab (GRAB)
Metric	CHRW	GRAB
P/E Ratio (TTM)	22.50	34.10
P/S Ratio (TTM)	0.80	3.47
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	9.20	2.04
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	2.61%	5.71%