Seek Returns

MRSH vs. PRU: Marsh & McLennan Companies vs. Prudential Financial Stock Comparison

This page compares Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) with Prudential Financial (PRU) using performance and risk, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividends, and valuation metrics.

Performance

Cumulative Growth

MRSH
PRU
Loading price history…
Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) vs. Prudential Financial (PRU): Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) and Prudential Financial (PRU). Returns over one year are annualized.

Performance at a Glance

Performance metrics for Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) and Prudential Financial (PRU)
MetricMRSHPRU
1-Year Return-21.64%9.05%

Risk

Drawdown

MRSH
PRU
Loading price history…
Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) vs. Prudential Financial (PRU): Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Risk at a Glance

Risk metrics for Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) and Prudential Financial (PRU)
MetricMRSHPRU
1-Year Volatility23.49%22.71%
Beta0.600.85
3-Month Avg. Volume2.99M2.16M

Company Profile

Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) and Prudential Financial (PRU) both belong to the Insurance industry, though MRSH is classified under Insurance Brokers while PRU falls under Life & Health Insurance.

Company profile comparison for Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) and Prudential Financial (PRU)
Profile ItemMRSHPRU
NameMarsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.Prudential Financial, Inc.
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS Industry GroupInsuranceInsurance
GICS IndustryInsuranceInsurance
GICS Sub-IndustryInsurance BrokersLife & Health Insurance
Market Capitalization81.27 billion USD37.68 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973December 13, 2001
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

Prudential Financial (PRU) at 11.17 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) at 21.09 sits in the richer quartile — MRSH needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

MRSH

Insurance industry group

21.09

Max
25.24
MRSH
21.09
Q3
16.46
Median
12.28
Q1
8.66
Min
3.44

PRU

Insurance industry group

11.17

Max
25.24
Q3
16.46
Median
12.28
PRU
11.17
Q1
8.66
Min
3.44
Loading chart…
Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) vs. Prudential Financial (PRU): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

Prudential Financial (PRU) at 0.60 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) at 2.95 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.

MRSH

Insurance industry group

2.95

Max
3.96
MRSH
2.95
Q3
2.13
Median
1.17
Q1
0.82
Min
0.13

PRU

Insurance industry group

0.60

Max
3.96
Q3
2.13
Median
1.17
Q1
0.82
PRU
0.60
Min
0.13
Loading chart…
Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) vs. Prudential Financial (PRU): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

Prudential Financial (PRU) at 1.18 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) at 5.58 prices above its benchmark range — MRSH looks rich relative to book.

MRSH

Insurance industry group

5.58

MRSH
5.58
Max
3.70
Q3
2.21
Median
1.61
Q1
1.12
Min
-0.14

PRU

Insurance industry group

1.18

Max
3.70
Q3
2.21
Median
1.61
PRU
1.18
Q1
1.12
Min
-0.14
Loading chart…
Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) vs. Prudential Financial (PRU): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

Valuation metrics for Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) and Prudential Financial (PRU)
MetricMRSHPRU
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.0911.17
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.950.60
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.581.18
Free Cash Flow Yield----

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) at 27.57% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Prudential Financial (PRU) at 10.71% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for MRSH.

MRSH

Insurance industry group

27.57%

Max
38.88%
MRSH
27.57%
Q3
22.34%
Median
14.13%
Q1
9.51%
Min
-6.23%

PRU

Insurance industry group

10.71%

Max
38.88%
Q3
22.34%
Median
14.13%
PRU
10.71%
Q1
9.51%
Min
-6.23%
Loading chart…
Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) vs. Prudential Financial (PRU): A comparison of their ROE against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

Both Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) at 14.26% and Prudential Financial (PRU) at 5.48% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

MRSH

Insurance industry group

14.26%

Max
38.86%
Q3
19.36%
MRSH
14.26%
Median
11.07%
Q1
5.09%
Min
-2.80%

PRU

Insurance industry group

5.48%

Max
38.86%
Q3
19.36%
Median
11.07%
PRU
5.48%
Q1
5.09%
Min
-2.80%
Loading chart…
Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) vs. Prudential Financial (PRU): A comparison of their net margin against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) in Insurance and Prudential Financial (PRU) in Insurance, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability at a Glance

Profitability metrics for Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) and Prudential Financial (PRU)
MetricMRSHPRU
Return on Equity (TTM)27.57%10.71%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.27%0.41%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.26%5.48%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)----
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)----

Growth

Revenue Growth

Loading chart…
Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) vs. Prudential Financial (PRU): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth at a Glance

Revenue growth metrics for Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) and Prudential Financial (PRU)
MetricMRSHPRU
1-Year Revenue Growth10.32%-13.74%
3-Year Revenue CAGR9.20%2.28%

EPS Growth

Loading chart…
Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) vs. Prudential Financial (PRU): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth at a Glance

EPS growth metrics for Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) and Prudential Financial (PRU)
MetricMRSHPRU
1-Year EPS Growth3.06%33.20%
3-Year EPS CAGR11.75%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) in Insurance and Prudential Financial (PRU) in Insurance both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) in Insurance and Prudential Financial (PRU) in Insurance run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Financial strength metrics for Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) and Prudential Financial (PRU)
MetricMRSHPRU
Current Ratio (MRQ)----
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)----
Net Debt / EBITDA----

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Prudential Financial (PRU) at 5.16% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) at 2.13% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, PRU the richer one.

MRSH

Insurance industry group

2.13%

Max
5.43%
Q3
2.64%
MRSH
2.13%
Median
1.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PRU

Insurance industry group

5.16%

Max
5.43%
PRU
5.16%
Q3
2.64%
Median
1.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) vs. Prudential Financial (PRU): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) at 43.94% and Prudential Financial (PRU) at 56.13% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.

MRSH

Insurance industry group

43.94%

Max
86.52%
MRSH
43.94%
Q3
35.43%
Median
14.92%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PRU

Insurance industry group

56.13%

Max
86.52%
PRU
56.13%
Q3
35.43%
Median
14.92%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) vs. Prudential Financial (PRU): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

Dividends at a Glance

Dividend metrics for Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) and Prudential Financial (PRU)
MetricMRSHPRU
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.13%5.16%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)43.94%56.13%