MFC vs. WRB: Manulife Financial vs. W. R. Berkley Stock Comparison
How do Manulife Financial (MFC) and W. R. Berkley (WRB) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Manulife Financial (MFC) and W. R. Berkley (WRB) both belong to the Insurance industry, though MFC is classified under Life & Health Insurance while WRB falls under Property & Casualty Insurance.
| Profile Item | MFC | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Manulife Financial Corporation | W. R. Berkley Corporation |
| Country/Region | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Insurance | Insurance |
| GICS Industry | Insurance | Insurance |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Life & Health Insurance | Property & Casualty Insurance |
| Market Capitalization | 71.43 billion USD | 27.95 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | September 24, 1999 | October 23, 1973 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | MFC | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 36.28% | 4.12% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 38.35% | 21.96% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 22.50% | 18.80% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | MFC | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 20.87% | 22.41% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.85 | 0.21 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -26.99% | -26.29% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.92M | 2.52M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | MFC | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.53 | -0.01 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.19 | -0.01 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Manulife Financial (MFC) at 12.24% and W. R. Berkley (WRB) at 19.26% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
MFC
Insurance industry group
12.24%
- Max
- 41.68%
- Q3
- 22.04%
- Median
- 14.81%
- MFC
- 12.24%
- Q1
- 8.79%
- Min
- -10.66%
WRB
Insurance industry group
19.26%
- Max
- 41.68%
- Q3
- 22.04%
- WRB
- 19.26%
- Median
- 14.81%
- Q1
- 8.79%
- Min
- -10.66%
Net Margin (TTM)
Manulife Financial (MFC) at 18.97% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of W. R. Berkley (WRB) at 12.53%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
MFC
Insurance industry group
18.97%
- Max
- 29.92%
- MFC
- 18.97%
- Q3
- 17.03%
- Median
- 10.97%
- Q1
- 6.21%
- Min
- -4.68%
WRB
Insurance industry group
12.53%
- Max
- 29.92%
- Q3
- 17.03%
- WRB
- 12.53%
- Median
- 10.97%
- Q1
- 6.21%
- Min
- -4.68%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Manulife Financial (MFC) in Insurance and W. R. Berkley (WRB) in Insurance, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | MFC | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 12.24% | 19.26% |
| ROA (TTM) | 0.59% | 3.43% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 18.97% | 12.53% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Only one side can be read here: W. R. Berkley (WRB) reports revenue growth of 6.93%, ranked against its industry; Manulife Financial (MFC) has no revenue growth figure this period.
EPS Growth
Both Manulife Financial (MFC) at 8.10% and W. R. Berkley (WRB) at 2.06% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | MFC | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -- | 6.93% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 29.95% | 9.28% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 8.10% | 2.06% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -5.86% | 10.55% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Manulife Financial (MFC) in Insurance and W. R. Berkley (WRB) in Insurance both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Manulife Financial (MFC) in Insurance and W. R. Berkley (WRB) in Insurance run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | MFC | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Manulife Financial (MFC) at 4.32% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while W. R. Berkley (WRB) at 0.49% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, MFC the richer one.
MFC
Insurance industry group
4.32%
- Max
- 5.12%
- MFC
- 4.32%
- Q3
- 2.15%
- Median
- 0.98%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WRB
Insurance industry group
0.49%
- Max
- 5.12%
- Q3
- 2.15%
- Median
- 0.98%
- WRB
- 0.49%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
W. R. Berkley (WRB) at 8.03% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Manulife Financial (MFC) at 54.30% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
MFC
Insurance industry group
54.30%
- Max
- 76.67%
- MFC
- 54.30%
- Q3
- 35.18%
- Median
- 14.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WRB
Insurance industry group
8.03%
- Max
- 76.67%
- Q3
- 35.18%
- Median
- 14.74%
- WRB
- 8.03%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | MFC | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 4.32% | 0.49% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 54.30% | 8.03% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Manulife Financial (MFC) at 17.23 and W. R. Berkley (WRB) at 15.90 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
MFC
Insurance industry group
17.23
- Max
- 28.37
- Q3
- 18.75
- MFC
- 17.23
- Median
- 12.23
- Q1
- 9.08
- Min
- 2.32
WRB
Insurance industry group
15.90
- Max
- 28.37
- Q3
- 18.75
- WRB
- 15.90
- Median
- 12.23
- Q1
- 9.08
- Min
- 2.32
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Manulife Financial (MFC) at 2.11 and W. R. Berkley (WRB) at 1.88 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
MFC
Insurance industry group
2.11
- Max
- 4.03
- Q3
- 2.25
- MFC
- 2.11
- Median
- 1.23
- Q1
- 0.85
- Min
- 0.07
WRB
Insurance industry group
1.88
- Max
- 4.03
- Q3
- 2.25
- WRB
- 1.88
- Median
- 1.23
- Q1
- 0.85
- Min
- 0.07
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Manulife Financial (MFC) at 2.13 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while W. R. Berkley (WRB) at 3.04 carries an above-peer premium to book — WRB is pricier on assets.
MFC
Insurance industry group
2.13
- Max
- 5.07
- Q3
- 2.79
- MFC
- 2.13
- Median
- 1.76
- Q1
- 1.23
- Min
- 0.30
WRB
Insurance industry group
3.04
- Max
- 5.07
- WRB
- 3.04
- Q3
- 2.79
- Median
- 1.76
- Q1
- 1.23
- Min
- 0.30
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | MFC | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 17.23 | 15.90 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.11 | 1.88 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.13 | 3.04 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |