CB vs. WRB: Chubb vs. W. R. Berkley Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Chubb (CB) and W. R. Berkley (WRB) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Chubb (CB) and W. R. Berkley (WRB) are both classified in the Property & Casualty Insurance sub-industry within the broader Insurance industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Company profile comparison for Chubb (CB) and W. R. Berkley (WRB)
Profile Item	CB	WRB
Name	Chubb Limited	W. R. Berkley Corporation
Country/Region	Switzerland	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry Group	Insurance	Insurance
GICS Industry	Insurance	Insurance
GICS Sub-Industry	Property & Casualty Insurance	Property & Casualty Insurance
Market Capitalization	139.47 billion USD	27.95 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	March 25, 1993	October 23, 1973
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

WRB

GSPC

Chubb (CB) vs. W. R. Berkley (WRB), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Chubb (CB) and W. R. Berkley (WRB). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Chubb (CB) and W. R. Berkley (WRB). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Chubb (CB) and W. R. Berkley (WRB)
Metric	CB	WRB
Total Return (1Y)	27.51%	4.12%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	19.71%	21.96%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	14.93%	18.80%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

WRB

GSPC

Chubb (CB) vs. W. R. Berkley (WRB), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Chubb (CB) and W. R. Berkley (WRB). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Chubb (CB) and W. R. Berkley (WRB)
Metric	CB	WRB
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	19.45%	22.41%
Beta (5Y)	0.28	0.21
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-19.26%	-26.29%
Avg. Volume (3M)	1.60M	2.52M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

CB and WRB are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Chubb (CB) and W. R. Berkley (WRB)
Metric	CB	WRB
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	1.19	-0.01
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	1.92	-0.01

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Chubb (CB) at 14.25% and W. R. Berkley (WRB) at 19.26% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

CB

Insurance industry group

14.25%

Max: 41.68%
Q3: 22.04%
Median: 14.81%
CB: 14.25%
Q1: 8.79%
Min: -10.66%

WRB

Insurance industry group

19.26%

Max: 41.68%
Q3: 22.04%
WRB: 19.26%
Median: 14.81%
Q1: 8.79%
Min: -10.66%

Chubb (CB) vs. W. R. Berkley (WRB): A comparison of their ROE against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Chubb (CB) at 18.13% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of W. R. Berkley (WRB) at 12.53%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

CB

Insurance industry group

18.13%

Max: 29.92%
CB: 18.13%
Q3: 17.03%
Median: 10.97%
Q1: 6.21%
Min: -4.68%

WRB

Insurance industry group

12.53%

Max: 29.92%
Q3: 17.03%
WRB: 12.53%
Median: 10.97%
Q1: 6.21%
Min: -4.68%

Chubb (CB) vs. W. R. Berkley (WRB): A comparison of their net margin against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Chubb (CB) in Insurance and W. R. Berkley (WRB) in Insurance, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Chubb (CB) and W. R. Berkley (WRB)
Metric	CB	WRB
ROE (TTM)	14.25%	19.26%
ROA (TTM)	3.11%	3.43%
Net Margin (TTM)	18.13%	12.53%
Operating Margin (TTM)	--	--
Gross Margin (TTM)	--	--

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Chubb (CB) at 6.98% and W. R. Berkley (WRB) at 6.93% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Chubb (CB) vs. W. R. Berkley (WRB): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both Chubb (CB) at 14.08% and W. R. Berkley (WRB) at 2.06% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Chubb (CB) vs. W. R. Berkley (WRB): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Chubb (CB) and W. R. Berkley (WRB)
Metric	CB	WRB
Revenue Growth (YoY)	6.98%	6.93%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	11.81%	9.28%
EPS Growth (YoY)	14.08%	2.06%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	26.96%	10.55%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Chubb (CB) in Insurance and W. R. Berkley (WRB) in Insurance both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Chubb (CB) in Insurance and W. R. Berkley (WRB) in Insurance run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Chubb (CB) and W. R. Berkley (WRB)
Metric	CB	WRB
Current Ratio (MRQ)	--	--
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	--	--
Net Debt / EBITDA	--	--

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Chubb (CB) at 1.07% and W. R. Berkley (WRB) at 0.49% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

CB

Insurance industry group

1.07%

Max: 5.12%
Q3: 2.15%
CB: 1.07%
Median: 0.98%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

WRB

Insurance industry group

0.49%

Max: 5.12%
Q3: 2.15%
Median: 0.98%
WRB: 0.49%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Chubb (CB) vs. W. R. Berkley (WRB): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Chubb (CB) at 13.95% and W. R. Berkley (WRB) at 8.03% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

CB

Insurance industry group

13.95%

Max: 76.67%
Q3: 35.18%
Median: 14.74%
CB: 13.95%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

WRB

Insurance industry group

8.03%

Max: 76.67%
Q3: 35.18%
Median: 14.74%
WRB: 8.03%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Chubb (CB) vs. W. R. Berkley (WRB): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Chubb (CB) and W. R. Berkley (WRB)
Metric	CB	WRB
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.07%	0.49%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	13.95%	8.03%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Chubb (CB) at 12.79 and W. R. Berkley (WRB) at 15.90 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

CB

Insurance industry group

12.79

Max: 28.37
Q3: 18.75
CB: 12.79
Median: 12.23
Q1: 9.08
Min: 2.32

WRB

Insurance industry group

15.90

Max: 28.37
Q3: 18.75
WRB: 15.90
Median: 12.23
Q1: 9.08
Min: 2.32

Chubb (CB) vs. W. R. Berkley (WRB): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both Chubb (CB) at 2.25 and W. R. Berkley (WRB) at 1.88 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

CB

Insurance industry group

2.25

Max: 4.03
CB: 2.25
Q3: 2.25
Median: 1.23
Q1: 0.85
Min: 0.07

WRB

Insurance industry group

1.88

Max: 4.03
Q3: 2.25
WRB: 1.88
Median: 1.23
Q1: 0.85
Min: 0.07

Chubb (CB) vs. W. R. Berkley (WRB): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Chubb (CB) at 1.91 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while W. R. Berkley (WRB) at 3.04 carries an above-peer premium to book — WRB is pricier on assets.

CB

Insurance industry group

1.91

Max: 5.07
Q3: 2.79
CB: 1.91
Median: 1.76
Q1: 1.23
Min: 0.30

WRB

Insurance industry group

3.04

Max: 5.07
WRB: 3.04
Q3: 2.79
Median: 1.76
Q1: 1.23
Min: 0.30

Chubb (CB) vs. W. R. Berkley (WRB): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Chubb (CB) and W. R. Berkley (WRB)
Metric	CB	WRB
P/E Ratio (TTM)	12.79	15.90
P/S Ratio (TTM)	2.25	1.88
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	1.91	3.04
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	--	--