Seek Returns

MFC vs. MRSH: Manulife Financial vs. Marsh & McLennan Companies Stock Comparison

How do Manulife Financial (MFC) and Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Manulife Financial (MFC) and Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) both belong to the Insurance industry, though MFC is classified under Life & Health Insurance while MRSH falls under Insurance Brokers.

Company profile comparison for Manulife Financial (MFC) and Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH)
Profile ItemMFCMRSH
NameManulife Financial CorporationMarsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
Country/RegionCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS Industry GroupInsuranceInsurance
GICS IndustryInsuranceInsurance
GICS Sub-IndustryLife & Health InsuranceInsurance Brokers
Market Capitalization67.48 billion USD80.30 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 24, 1999February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

MFC
MRSH
Loading price history…
Manulife Financial (MFC) vs. Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH): Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Manulife Financial (MFC) and Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH). Returns over one year are annualized.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Manulife Financial (MFC) and Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH)
MetricMFCMRSH
Total Return (1Y)29.21%-22.31%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

MFC
MRSH
Loading price history…
Manulife Financial (MFC) vs. Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH): Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Manulife Financial (MFC) and Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH)
MetricMFCMRSH
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)20.56%24.17%
Beta (5Y)0.840.61
Avg. Volume (3M)2.17M2.88M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
MFC and MRSH are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) at 27.57% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Manulife Financial (MFC) at 12.56% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for MRSH.

MFC

Insurance industry group

12.56%

Max
38.88%
Q3
22.53%
Median
14.77%
MFC
12.56%
Q1
9.91%
Min
-6.23%

MRSH

Insurance industry group

27.57%

Max
38.88%
MRSH
27.57%
Q3
22.53%
Median
14.77%
Q1
9.91%
Min
-6.23%
Loading chart…
Manulife Financial (MFC) vs. Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH): A comparison of their ROE against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Manulife Financial (MFC) at 20.04% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) at 14.26%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

MFC

Insurance industry group

20.04%

Max
38.86%
MFC
20.04%
Q3
19.36%
Median
11.07%
Q1
5.09%
Min
-2.80%

MRSH

Insurance industry group

14.26%

Max
38.86%
Q3
19.36%
MRSH
14.26%
Median
11.07%
Q1
5.09%
Min
-2.80%
Loading chart…
Manulife Financial (MFC) vs. Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH): A comparison of their net margin against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Manulife Financial (MFC) in Insurance and Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) in Insurance, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Manulife Financial (MFC) and Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH)
MetricMFCMRSH
ROE (TTM)12.56%27.57%
ROA (TTM)0.59%7.27%
Net Margin (TTM)20.04%14.26%
Operating Margin (TTM)----
Gross Margin (TTM)----

Growth

Revenue Growth

Loading chart…
Manulife Financial (MFC) vs. Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth Metrics

Revenue growth metrics for Manulife Financial (MFC) and Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH)
MetricMFCMRSH
Revenue Growth (YoY)--10.32%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)29.95%9.20%

EPS Growth

Loading chart…
Manulife Financial (MFC) vs. Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth Metrics

EPS growth metrics for Manulife Financial (MFC) and Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH)
MetricMFCMRSH
EPS Growth (YoY)8.10%3.06%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-5.86%11.75%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Manulife Financial (MFC) in Insurance and Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) in Insurance both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Manulife Financial (MFC) in Insurance and Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) in Insurance run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Manulife Financial (MFC) and Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH)
MetricMFCMRSH
Current Ratio (MRQ)----
Debt / Equity (MRQ)----
Net Debt / EBITDA----

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Manulife Financial (MFC) at 4.44% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) at 2.16% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, MFC the richer one.

MFC

Insurance industry group

4.44%

Max
5.58%
MFC
4.44%
Q3
2.46%
Median
1.18%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MRSH

Insurance industry group

2.16%

Max
5.58%
Q3
2.46%
MRSH
2.16%
Median
1.18%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Manulife Financial (MFC) vs. Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Manulife Financial (MFC) at 52.02% and Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) at 43.94% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.

MFC

Insurance industry group

52.02%

Max
86.52%
MFC
52.02%
Q3
35.43%
Median
14.92%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MRSH

Insurance industry group

43.94%

Max
86.52%
MRSH
43.94%
Q3
35.43%
Median
14.92%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Manulife Financial (MFC) vs. Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Manulife Financial (MFC) and Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH)
MetricMFCMRSH
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.44%2.16%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)52.02%43.94%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Manulife Financial (MFC) at 16.60 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) at 20.83 sits in the richer quartile — MRSH needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

MFC

Insurance industry group

16.60

Max
28.97
Q3
17.55
MFC
16.60
Median
13.05
Q1
8.85
Min
3.65

MRSH

Insurance industry group

20.83

Max
28.97
MRSH
20.83
Q3
17.55
Median
13.05
Q1
8.85
Min
3.65
Loading chart…
Manulife Financial (MFC) vs. Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Manulife Financial (MFC) at 2.11 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) at 2.92 sits in the pricier quartile — MRSH costs more per dollar of sales.

MFC

Insurance industry group

2.11

Max
4.36
Q3
2.32
MFC
2.11
Median
1.25
Q1
0.86
Min
0.09

MRSH

Insurance industry group

2.92

Max
4.36
MRSH
2.92
Q3
2.32
Median
1.25
Q1
0.86
Min
0.09
Loading chart…
Manulife Financial (MFC) vs. Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Manulife Financial (MFC) at 1.96 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) at 5.52 prices above its benchmark range — MRSH looks rich relative to book.

MFC

Insurance industry group

1.96

Max
3.98
Q3
2.56
MFC
1.96
Median
1.75
Q1
1.21
Min
-0.15

MRSH

Insurance industry group

5.52

MRSH
5.52
Max
3.98
Q3
2.56
Median
1.75
Q1
1.21
Min
-0.15
Loading chart…
Manulife Financial (MFC) vs. Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Manulife Financial (MFC) and Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH)
MetricMFCMRSH
P/E Ratio (TTM)16.6020.83
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.112.92
P/B Ratio (MRQ)1.965.52
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)----