META vs. NTES: Meta Platforms vs. NetEase Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Meta Platforms (META) and NetEase (NTES) both fall under the Media & Entertainment industry group, but META is classified in Interactive Media & Services while NTES is classified in Entertainment.

Meta Platforms (META) trades as ordinary local shares, while NetEase (NTES) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Meta Platforms (META) at 32.93% and NetEase (NTES) at 22.13% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.

Meta Platforms (META) at 32.84% keeps the most of each sales dollar — above its industry’s net margin range — and NetEase (NTES) at 29.84% also retains a top-quartile share.

Both Meta Platforms (META) at 40.62% and NetEase (NTES) at 41.37% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Meta Platforms (META) at 22.17% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while NetEase (NTES) at 6.96% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for META.

Both Meta Platforms (META) at -1.55% and NetEase (NTES) at 14.04% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Meta Platforms (META) at 2.35 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while NetEase (NTES) at 3.29 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

NetEase (NTES) at 0.06 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Meta Platforms (META) at 0.36 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Meta Platforms (META) at 0.33% pays an industry-typical yield; NetEase (NTES) at 3.11% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.

Meta Platforms (META) at 7.64% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while NetEase (NTES) at 39.66% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both Meta Platforms (META) at 23.47 and NetEase (NTES) at 17.27 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

NetEase (NTES) at 0.73 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Meta Platforms (META) at 7.60 sits in the pricier quartile — META costs more per dollar of sales.

Both look rich against book: Meta Platforms (META) at 6.71 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and NetEase (NTES) at 17.04 prices even higher, above its industry range.

Valuation Metrics