META vs. NTES: Meta Platforms vs. NetEase Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Meta Platforms (META) and NetEase (NTES) both fall under the Media & Entertainment industry group, but META is classified in Interactive Media & Services while NTES is classified in Entertainment.

Meta Platforms (META) trades as ordinary local shares, while NetEase (NTES) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Meta Platforms (META) is heavily traded at around 18.10M shares per day, whereas NetEase (NTES) sees a more moderate 902.81K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Meta Platforms (META) at 29.85% and NetEase (NTES) at 20.37% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.

For every dollar of sales, both Meta Platforms (META) at 29.84% and NetEase (NTES) at 27.88% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.

Both Meta Platforms (META) at 34.83% and NetEase (NTES) at 40.16% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Meta Platforms (META) at 22.17% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while NetEase (NTES) at 6.96% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for META.

Both Meta Platforms (META) at -1.55% and NetEase (NTES) at 14.04% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Meta Platforms (META) at 2.23 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while NetEase (NTES) at 3.45 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

NetEase (NTES) at 0.07 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Meta Platforms (META) at 0.43 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Meta Platforms (META) at 0.34% pays an industry-typical yield; NetEase (NTES) at 3.42% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.

Meta Platforms (META) at 7.91% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while NetEase (NTES) at 41.68% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both Meta Platforms (META) at 23.26 and NetEase (NTES) at 15.93 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

NetEase (NTES) at 0.66 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Meta Platforms (META) at 6.88 sits in the pricier quartile — META costs more per dollar of sales.

Both look rich against book: Meta Platforms (META) at 6.02 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and NetEase (NTES) at 15.35 prices even higher, above its industry range.

Valuation Metrics