META vs. NTES: Meta Platforms vs. NetEase Stock Comparison

Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Performance at a Glance

Risk

Drawdown

Meta Platforms (META) is heavily traded at around 17.05M shares per day, whereas NetEase (NTES) sees a more moderate 853.55K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk at a Glance

Company Profile

Meta Platforms (META) and NetEase (NTES) both fall under the Media & Entertainment industry group, but META is classified in Interactive Media & Services while NTES is classified in Entertainment.

Meta Platforms (META) trades as ordinary local shares, while NetEase (NTES) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Valuation

Both Meta Platforms (META) at 20.62 and NetEase (NTES) at 16.11 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

NetEase (NTES) at 0.70 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Meta Platforms (META) at 6.70 sits in the pricier quartile — META costs more per dollar of sales.

Both look rich against book: Meta Platforms (META) at 5.91 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and NetEase (NTES) at 16.55 prices even higher, above its industry range.

Valuation at a Glance

Profitability

Both Meta Platforms (META) at 32.93% and NetEase (NTES) at 22.13% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.

Meta Platforms (META) at 32.84% keeps the most of each sales dollar — above its industry’s net margin range — and NetEase (NTES) at 29.84% also retains a top-quartile share.

Both Meta Platforms (META) at 40.62% and NetEase (NTES) at 41.37% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.

Profitability at a Glance

Growth

Revenue Growth

Revenue Growth at a Glance

EPS Growth

EPS Growth at a Glance

Financial Strength

Both Meta Platforms (META) at 2.35 and NetEase (NTES) at 3.29 post current ratio above their industries’ typical mid-ranges — short-term liquidity appears comfortable, though unusually high readings can point to idle current assets.

NetEase (NTES) at 0.06 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Meta Platforms (META) at 0.36 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Dividends

NetEase (NTES) at 2.40% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Meta Platforms (META) at 0.37% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, NTES the richer one.

Meta Platforms (META) at 7.64% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while NetEase (NTES) at 39.66% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

Dividends at a Glance