LVS vs. TCOM: Las Vegas Sands vs. Trip.com Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Las Vegas Sands (LVS) and Trip.com (TCOM) both belong to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, though LVS is classified under Casinos & Gaming while TCOM falls under Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines.

Las Vegas Sands (LVS) trades as ordinary local shares, while Trip.com (TCOM) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Trip.com (TCOM) reports a negative beta of -0.04, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Las Vegas Sands (LVS) has a non-negative beta of 0.73.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Las Vegas Sands (LVS) at 207.08% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Trip.com (TCOM) at 15.65%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Trip.com (TCOM) at 36.91% converts revenue to bottom-line profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while Las Vegas Sands (LVS) at 11.85% keeps roughly the typical share for its industry.

Trip.com (TCOM) reports a negative operating margin of -9.33%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Las Vegas Sands (LVS) reports 19.34%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Las Vegas Sands (LVS) at 15.22% and Trip.com (TCOM) at 17.10% sit in the top peer quartile for revenue growth, so each is growing its top line faster than typical industry peers.

Trip.com (TCOM) at 92.37% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Las Vegas Sands (LVS) at 19.90% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for TCOM.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Both Las Vegas Sands (LVS) at 0.83 and Trip.com (TCOM) at 1.33 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

Only one side’s leverage can be read here: Trip.com (TCOM) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 0.17 against its industry range, while Las Vegas Sands (LVS) reports no figure this period.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Trip.com (TCOM) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Las Vegas Sands (LVS) reports a yield of 2.93%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Trip.com (TCOM) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Las Vegas Sands (LVS) reports a payout of 47.13%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Trip.com (TCOM) at 8.95 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Las Vegas Sands (LVS) at 16.69 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for TCOM, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

Trip.com (TCOM) at 0.43 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Las Vegas Sands (LVS) at 1.94 prices around its industry’s middle — TCOM costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

Las Vegas Sands (LVS) reports a negative P/B ratio of -74.19, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile Trip.com (TCOM) reports 1.18, ranking against industry peers normally.

Valuation Metrics