EG vs. UNM: Everest vs. Unum Stock Comparison
How do Everest (EG) and Unum (UNM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Everest (EG) and Unum (UNM) both belong to the Insurance industry, though EG is classified under Reinsurance while UNM falls under Life & Health Insurance.
| Profile Item | EG | UNM |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Everest Group, Ltd. | Unum Group |
| Country/Region | Bermuda | United States |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Insurance | Insurance |
| GICS Industry | Insurance | Insurance |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Reinsurance | Life & Health Insurance |
| Market Capitalization | 15.23 billion USD | 11.89 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | October 3, 1995 | November 6, 1986 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | EG | UNM |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 28.99% | 4.52% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 4.67% | 25.65% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 10.80% | 29.12% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | EG | UNM |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 21.71% | 29.31% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.23 | 0.28 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -23.84% | -23.00% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 382.05K | 1.86M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | EG | UNM |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.14 | 0.01 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.77 | 0.01 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Everest (EG) at 12.77% is around its peer norm for ROE, while Unum (UNM) at 2.25% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.
EG
Insurance industry group
12.77%
- Max
- 41.68%
- Q3
- 22.04%
- Median
- 14.81%
- EG
- 12.77%
- Q1
- 8.79%
- Min
- -10.66%
UNM
Insurance industry group
2.25%
- Max
- 41.68%
- Q3
- 22.04%
- Median
- 14.81%
- Q1
- 8.79%
- UNM
- 2.25%
- Min
- -10.66%
Net Margin (TTM)
Everest (EG) at 11.68% keeps about the industry-typical share of revenue as profit, while Unum (UNM) at 1.94% retains only a bottom-quartile share.
EG
Insurance industry group
11.68%
- Max
- 29.92%
- Q3
- 17.03%
- EG
- 11.68%
- Median
- 10.97%
- Q1
- 6.21%
- Min
- -4.68%
UNM
Insurance industry group
1.94%
- Max
- 29.92%
- Q3
- 17.03%
- Median
- 10.97%
- Q1
- 6.21%
- UNM
- 1.94%
- Min
- -4.68%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Everest (EG) in Insurance and Unum (UNM) in Insurance, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | EG | UNM |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 12.77% | 2.25% |
| ROA (TTM) | 2.43% | 0.51% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.68% | 1.94% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Everest (EG) at 0.83% and Unum (UNM) at 1.52% post bottom-quartile revenue growth versus peers, pointing to weaker demand or pricing momentum than typical rivals.
EPS Growth
Everest (EG) at 18.94% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Unum (UNM) at -54.86% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | EG | UNM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 0.83% | 1.52% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 12.84% | 3.02% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 18.94% | -54.86% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 35.51% | -13.07% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Everest (EG) in Insurance and Unum (UNM) in Insurance both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Everest (EG) in Insurance and Unum (UNM) in Insurance run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | EG | UNM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Unum (UNM) at 2.61% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Everest (EG) at 1.91% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, UNM the richer one.
EG
Insurance industry group
1.91%
- Max
- 5.12%
- Q3
- 2.15%
- EG
- 1.91%
- Median
- 0.98%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
UNM
Insurance industry group
2.61%
- Max
- 5.12%
- UNM
- 2.61%
- Q3
- 2.15%
- Median
- 0.98%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Unum (UNM) reports payout ratio above 100% at 128.23%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Everest (EG) reports 16.81%, ranking against industry peers normally.
EG
Insurance industry group
16.81%
- Max
- 76.67%
- Q3
- 35.18%
- EG
- 16.81%
- Median
- 14.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
UNM
Insurance industry group
128.23%
- UNM
- 128.23%
- Max
- 76.67%
- Q3
- 35.18%
- Median
- 14.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | EG | UNM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.91% | 2.61% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 16.81% | 128.23% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Everest (EG) at 8.64 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Unum (UNM) at 52.21 trades above its peer range — a wide earnings-valuation gap relative to industry peers.
EG
Insurance industry group
8.64
- Max
- 28.37
- Q3
- 18.75
- Median
- 12.23
- Q1
- 9.08
- EG
- 8.64
- Min
- 2.32
UNM
Insurance industry group
52.21
- UNM
- 52.21
- Max
- 28.37
- Q3
- 18.75
- Median
- 12.23
- Q1
- 9.08
- Min
- 2.32
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Everest (EG) at 0.94 and Unum (UNM) at 0.95 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
EG
Insurance industry group
0.94
- Max
- 4.03
- Q3
- 2.25
- Median
- 1.23
- EG
- 0.94
- Q1
- 0.85
- Min
- 0.07
UNM
Insurance industry group
0.95
- Max
- 4.03
- Q3
- 2.25
- Median
- 1.23
- UNM
- 0.95
- Q1
- 0.85
- Min
- 0.07
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Relative to net asset value, both Everest (EG) at 1.08 and Unum (UNM) at 1.11 look inexpensive, sitting in the lower P/B ratio quartile of their industries.
EG
Insurance industry group
1.08
- Max
- 5.07
- Q3
- 2.79
- Median
- 1.76
- Q1
- 1.23
- EG
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.30
UNM
Insurance industry group
1.11
- Max
- 5.07
- Q3
- 2.79
- Median
- 1.76
- Q1
- 1.23
- UNM
- 1.11
- Min
- 0.30
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | EG | UNM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 8.64 | 52.21 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.94 | 0.95 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.08 | 1.11 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |