CSX vs. ZTO: CSX vs. ZTO Express (Cayman) Stock Comparison

Company Profile

CSX (CSX) and ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) both fall under the Transportation industry group, but CSX is classified in Ground Transportation while ZTO is classified in Air Freight & Logistics.

CSX (CSX) trades as ordinary local shares, while ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) reports a negative beta of -0.18, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. CSX (CSX) has a non-negative beta of 1.12.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

CSX (CSX) at 26.39% sits in the top ROE quartile, while ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 16.28% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CSX.

CSX (CSX) at 23.97% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 19.04%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

CSX (CSX) at 39.26% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 22.19%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 10.88% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while CSX (CSX) at -3.08% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

Both CSX (CSX) at -13.97% and ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 4.58% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

CSX (CSX) at 0.84 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 1.67 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

Both CSX (CSX) at 1.35 and ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 0.35 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

CSX (CSX) at 1.08% pays an industry-typical yield; ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 12.89% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.

Both CSX (CSX) at 28.65% and ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 38.36% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both CSX (CSX) at 25.58 and ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 11.37 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 0.29 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while CSX (CSX) at 6.09 prices above its industry range — a wide gap in sales valuation between them.

ZTO Express (Cayman) (ZTO) at 1.66 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while CSX (CSX) at 6.29 carries an above-peer premium to book — CSX is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics