CNA vs. EG: CNA Financial vs. Everest Stock Comparison
How do CNA Financial (CNA) and Everest (EG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
CNA Financial (CNA) and Everest (EG) both belong to the Insurance industry, though CNA is classified under Property & Casualty Insurance while EG falls under Reinsurance.
| Profile Item | CNA | EG |
|---|---|---|
| Name | CNA Financial Corporation Common Stock | Everest Group, Ltd. |
| Country/Region | United States | Bermuda |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Insurance | Insurance |
| GICS Industry | Insurance | Insurance |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Property & Casualty Insurance | Reinsurance |
| Market Capitalization | 12.81 billion USD | 15.23 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 21, 1973 | October 3, 1995 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CNA | EG |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 13.42% | 28.99% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 15.22% | 4.67% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 9.00% | 10.80% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CNA | EG |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 20.85% | 21.71% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.22 | 0.23 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -25.67% | -23.84% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 454.06K | 382.05K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CNA | EG |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.44 | 1.14 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.62 | 1.77 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both CNA Financial (CNA) at 9.56% and Everest (EG) at 12.77% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
CNA
Insurance industry group
9.56%
- Max
- 41.68%
- Q3
- 22.04%
- Median
- 14.81%
- CNA
- 9.56%
- Q1
- 8.79%
- Min
- -10.66%
EG
Insurance industry group
12.77%
- Max
- 41.68%
- Q3
- 22.04%
- Median
- 14.81%
- EG
- 12.77%
- Q1
- 8.79%
- Min
- -10.66%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both CNA Financial (CNA) at 6.80% and Everest (EG) at 11.68% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CNA
Insurance industry group
6.80%
- Max
- 29.92%
- Q3
- 17.03%
- Median
- 10.97%
- CNA
- 6.80%
- Q1
- 6.21%
- Min
- -4.68%
EG
Insurance industry group
11.68%
- Max
- 29.92%
- Q3
- 17.03%
- EG
- 11.68%
- Median
- 10.97%
- Q1
- 6.21%
- Min
- -4.68%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for CNA Financial (CNA) in Insurance and Everest (EG) in Insurance, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CNA | EG |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 9.56% | 12.77% |
| ROA (TTM) | 1.29% | 2.43% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 6.80% | 11.68% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
CNA Financial (CNA) at 5.10% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Everest (EG) at 0.83% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both CNA Financial (CNA) at 33.24% and Everest (EG) at 18.94% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CNA | EG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 5.10% | 0.83% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 7.36% | 12.84% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 33.24% | 18.94% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 12.66% | 35.51% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: CNA Financial (CNA) in Insurance and Everest (EG) in Insurance both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: CNA Financial (CNA) in Insurance and Everest (EG) in Insurance run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CNA | EG |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
CNA Financial (CNA) at 3.95% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Everest (EG) at 1.91% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, CNA the richer one.
CNA
Insurance industry group
3.95%
- Max
- 5.12%
- CNA
- 3.95%
- Q3
- 2.15%
- Median
- 0.98%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EG
Insurance industry group
1.91%
- Max
- 5.12%
- Q3
- 2.15%
- EG
- 1.91%
- Median
- 0.98%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Everest (EG) at 16.81% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while CNA Financial (CNA) at 50.26% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
CNA
Insurance industry group
50.26%
- Max
- 76.67%
- CNA
- 50.26%
- Q3
- 35.18%
- Median
- 14.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EG
Insurance industry group
16.81%
- Max
- 76.67%
- Q3
- 35.18%
- EG
- 16.81%
- Median
- 14.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CNA | EG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.95% | 1.91% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 50.26% | 16.81% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Everest (EG) at 8.64 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while CNA Financial (CNA) at 12.52 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for EG, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
CNA
Insurance industry group
12.52
- Max
- 28.37
- Q3
- 18.75
- CNA
- 12.52
- Median
- 12.23
- Q1
- 9.08
- Min
- 2.32
EG
Insurance industry group
8.64
- Max
- 28.37
- Q3
- 18.75
- Median
- 12.23
- Q1
- 9.08
- EG
- 8.64
- Min
- 2.32
P/S Ratio (TTM)
CNA Financial (CNA) at 0.84 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Everest (EG) at 0.94 prices around its industry’s middle — CNA costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
CNA
Insurance industry group
0.84
- Max
- 4.03
- Q3
- 2.25
- Median
- 1.23
- Q1
- 0.85
- CNA
- 0.84
- Min
- 0.07
EG
Insurance industry group
0.94
- Max
- 4.03
- Q3
- 2.25
- Median
- 1.23
- EG
- 0.94
- Q1
- 0.85
- Min
- 0.07
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Everest (EG) at 1.08 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while CNA Financial (CNA) at 1.25 is valued near its industry’s middle — EG is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.
CNA
Insurance industry group
1.25
- Max
- 5.07
- Q3
- 2.79
- Median
- 1.76
- CNA
- 1.25
- Q1
- 1.23
- Min
- 0.30
EG
Insurance industry group
1.08
- Max
- 5.07
- Q3
- 2.79
- Median
- 1.76
- Q1
- 1.23
- EG
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.30
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CNA | EG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 12.52 | 8.64 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.84 | 0.94 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.25 | 1.08 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |