Seek Returns logo

CHD vs. UL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CHD and UL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CHD is a standard domestic listing, while UL trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolCHDUL
Company NameChurch & Dwight Co., Inc.Unilever PLC
CountryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryHousehold ProductsPersonal Care Products
Market Capitalization22.82 billion USD153.09 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980March 25, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CHD and UL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CHD vs. UL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCHDUL
5-Day Price Return1.14%-0.55%
13-Week Price Return-1.57%-1.69%
26-Week Price Return-11.11%-3.77%
52-Week Price Return-7.06%-5.41%
Month-to-Date Return-0.09%1.86%
Year-to-Date Return-10.52%-1.28%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.75M2.02M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.39M2.75M
3-Month Volatility18.04%13.54%
Beta0.440.11

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CHD

12.01%

Household Products Industry

Max
226.04%
Q3
106.83%
Median
17.55%
Q1
9.51%
Min
-8.31%

CHD’s Return on Equity of 12.01% is on par with the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UL

29.40%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
31.59%
Q3
20.42%
Median
11.01%
Q1
3.26%
Min
-18.42%

In the upper quartile for the Personal Care Products industry, UL’s Return on Equity of 29.40% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CHD vs. UL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CHD

8.66%

Household Products Industry

Max
12.48%
Q3
10.54%
Median
9.15%
Q1
8.81%
Min
8.58%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Household Products industry, CHD’s Net Profit Margin of 8.66% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

UL

9.29%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
15.12%
Q3
12.06%
Median
9.26%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-0.40%

UL’s Net Profit Margin of 9.29% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CHD vs. UL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CHD

11.91%

Household Products Industry

Max
21.54%
Q3
16.06%
Median
13.28%
Q1
12.03%
Min
6.49%

CHD’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.91% is in the lower quartile for the Household Products industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

UL

14.58%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
19.80%
Q3
17.96%
Median
13.14%
Q1
7.58%
Min
-4.25%

UL’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.58% is around the midpoint for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CHD vs. UL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCHDUL
Return on Equity (TTM)12.01%29.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.95%7.13%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.66%9.29%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.91%14.58%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)44.47%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CHD

1.84

Household Products Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.04
Median
1.21
Q1
0.76
Min
0.55

CHD’s Current Ratio of 1.84 aligns with the median group of the Household Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UL

0.76

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.26
Q3
2.61
Median
1.74
Q1
1.13
Min
0.76

UL’s Current Ratio of 0.76 falls into the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CHD vs. UL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CHD

0.50

Household Products Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
1.47
Median
0.49
Q1
0.16
Min
0.01

CHD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.50 is typical for the Household Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UL

1.80

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
1.13
Q3
0.63
Median
0.26
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.80, UL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Personal Care Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CHD vs. UL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CHD

13.69

Household Products Industry

Max
83.52
Q3
68.49
Median
13.94
Q1
9.41
Min
4.76

CHD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.69 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UL

22.79

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
96.53
Q3
59.91
Median
22.25
Q1
7.85
Min
-1.93

UL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 22.79 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CHD vs. UL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCHDUL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.840.76
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.330.55
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.501.80
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.6922.79

Growth

Revenue Growth

CHD vs. UL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CHD vs. UL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CHD

1.24%

Household Products Industry

Max
5.40%
Q3
3.85%
Median
2.82%
Q1
1.83%
Min
0.00%

CHD’s Dividend Yield of 1.24% is in the lower quartile for the Household Products industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

UL

3.47%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.08%
Q3
2.46%
Median
1.82%
Q1
0.83%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.47%, UL offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Personal Care Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CHD vs. UL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CHD

35.75%

Household Products Industry

Max
191.34%
Q3
102.63%
Median
70.63%
Q1
34.62%
Min
0.00%

CHD’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.75% is within the typical range for the Household Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UL

79.51%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
207.61%
Q3
115.17%
Median
69.37%
Q1
47.71%
Min
0.00%

UL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 79.51% is within the typical range for the Personal Care Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CHD vs. UL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCHDUL
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.24%3.47%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)35.75%79.51%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CHD

43.63

Household Products Industry

Max
33.84
Q3
22.61
Median
18.73
Q1
14.08
Min
13.61

At 43.63, CHD’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Household Products industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

UL

22.94

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
36.75
Median
26.49
Q1
22.40
Min
11.12

UL’s P/E Ratio of 22.94 is within the middle range for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CHD vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CHD

3.78

Household Products Industry

Max
4.78
Q3
2.70
Median
1.93
Q1
1.27
Min
0.73

CHD’s P/S Ratio of 3.78 is in the upper echelon for the Household Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UL

2.13

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
2.83
Median
2.07
Q1
1.13
Min
0.00

UL’s P/S Ratio of 2.13 aligns with the market consensus for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CHD vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CHD

5.39

Household Products Industry

Max
14.28
Q3
14.28
Median
4.13
Q1
1.75
Min
1.42

CHD’s P/B Ratio of 5.39 is within the conventional range for the Household Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UL

7.06

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
7.32
Q3
5.26
Median
2.93
Q1
1.84
Min
1.14

UL’s P/B Ratio of 7.06 is in the upper tier for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CHD vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCHDUL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)43.6322.94
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.782.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.397.06
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)24.6219.80