Seek Returns logo

PG vs. UL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at PG and UL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

PG is a standard domestic listing, while UL trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolPGUL
Company NameThe Procter & Gamble CompanyUnilever PLC
CountryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryHousehold ProductsPersonal Care Products
Market Capitalization373.63 billion USD155.84 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962March 25, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of PG and UL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

PG vs. UL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolPGUL
5-Day Price Return3.75%3.92%
13-Week Price Return-3.19%-0.93%
26-Week Price Return-6.73%6.66%
52-Week Price Return-5.29%-2.07%
Month-to-Date Return6.01%6.44%
Year-to-Date Return-4.86%3.17%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.01M2.02M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.20M2.43M
3-Month Volatility14.84%15.01%
Beta0.370.11

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

PG

30.78%

Household Products Industry

Max
226.04%
Q3
106.83%
Median
17.55%
Q1
9.51%
Min
-8.31%

PG’s Return on Equity of 30.78% is on par with the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UL

29.40%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
31.59%
Q3
20.42%
Median
11.01%
Q1
3.26%
Min
-18.42%

In the upper quartile for the Personal Care Products industry, UL’s Return on Equity of 29.40% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

PG vs. UL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

PG

18.95%

Household Products Industry

Max
12.48%
Q3
10.54%
Median
9.15%
Q1
8.81%
Min
8.58%

PG’s Net Profit Margin of 18.95% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

UL

9.29%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
15.12%
Q3
12.06%
Median
9.26%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-0.40%

UL’s Net Profit Margin of 9.29% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PG vs. UL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

PG

23.32%

Household Products Industry

Max
21.54%
Q3
16.06%
Median
13.28%
Q1
12.03%
Min
6.49%

PG’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.32% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

UL

14.58%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
19.80%
Q3
17.96%
Median
13.14%
Q1
7.58%
Min
-4.25%

UL’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.58% is around the midpoint for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PG vs. UL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolPGUL
Return on Equity (TTM)30.78%29.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.85%7.13%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)18.95%9.29%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)23.32%14.58%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)51.34%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

PG

0.70

Household Products Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.04
Median
1.21
Q1
0.76
Min
0.55

PG’s Current Ratio of 0.70 falls into the lower quartile for the Household Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

UL

0.76

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.26
Q3
2.61
Median
1.74
Q1
1.13
Min
0.76

UL’s Current Ratio of 0.76 falls into the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

PG vs. UL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

PG

0.66

Household Products Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
1.47
Median
0.49
Q1
0.16
Min
0.01

PG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.66 is typical for the Household Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UL

1.80

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
1.13
Q3
0.63
Median
0.26
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.80, UL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Personal Care Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

PG vs. UL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

PG

47.04

Household Products Industry

Max
83.52
Q3
68.49
Median
13.94
Q1
9.41
Min
4.76

PG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 47.04 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UL

22.79

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
96.53
Q3
59.91
Median
22.25
Q1
7.85
Min
-1.93

UL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 22.79 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PG vs. UL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolPGUL
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.700.76
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.440.55
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.661.80
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)47.0422.79

Growth

Revenue Growth

PG vs. UL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

PG vs. UL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

PG

2.64%

Household Products Industry

Max
5.40%
Q3
3.85%
Median
2.82%
Q1
1.83%
Min
0.00%

PG’s Dividend Yield of 2.64% is consistent with its peers in the Household Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UL

3.42%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.08%
Q3
2.46%
Median
1.82%
Q1
0.83%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.42%, UL offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Personal Care Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

PG vs. UL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

PG

61.80%

Household Products Industry

Max
191.34%
Q3
102.63%
Median
70.63%
Q1
34.62%
Min
0.00%

PG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 61.80% is within the typical range for the Household Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UL

79.51%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
207.61%
Q3
115.17%
Median
69.37%
Q1
47.71%
Min
0.00%

UL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 79.51% is within the typical range for the Personal Care Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PG vs. UL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolPGUL
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.64%3.42%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)61.80%79.51%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

PG

23.40

Household Products Industry

Max
33.84
Q3
22.61
Median
18.73
Q1
14.08
Min
13.61

A P/E Ratio of 23.40 places PG in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

UL

23.23

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
36.75
Median
26.49
Q1
22.40
Min
11.12

UL’s P/E Ratio of 23.23 is within the middle range for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PG vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

PG

4.43

Household Products Industry

Max
4.78
Q3
2.70
Median
1.93
Q1
1.27
Min
0.73

PG’s P/S Ratio of 4.43 is in the upper echelon for the Household Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UL

2.16

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
2.83
Median
2.07
Q1
1.13
Min
0.00

UL’s P/S Ratio of 2.16 aligns with the market consensus for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PG vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

PG

7.14

Household Products Industry

Max
14.28
Q3
14.28
Median
4.13
Q1
1.75
Min
1.42

PG’s P/B Ratio of 7.14 is within the conventional range for the Household Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UL

7.06

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
7.32
Q3
5.26
Median
2.93
Q1
1.84
Min
1.14

UL’s P/B Ratio of 7.06 is in the upper tier for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

PG vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolPGUL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.4023.23
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.432.16
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.147.06
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.6120.05