KMB vs. UL: Kimberly-Clark vs. Unilever Stock Comparison
How do Kimberly-Clark (KMB) and Unilever (UL) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Kimberly-Clark (KMB) and Unilever (UL) both fall under the Household & Personal Products industry group, but KMB is classified in Household Products while UL is classified in Personal Care Products.
Kimberly-Clark (KMB) trades as ordinary local shares, while Unilever (UL) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | KMB | UL |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Kimberly-Clark Corporation | Unilever PLC Sponsored American Depositary Receipt |
| Country/Region | United States | United Kingdom |
| GICS Sector | Consumer Staples | Consumer Staples |
| GICS Industry Group | Household & Personal Products | Household & Personal Products |
| GICS Industry | Household Products | Personal Care Products |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Household Products | Personal Care Products |
| Market Capitalization | 36.71 billion USD | 133.70 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | March 25, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | KMB | UL |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -13.19% | -6.71% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -0.75% | 5.62% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -0.42% | 2.61% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | KMB | UL |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 27.18% | 24.06% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.26 | 0.41 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -34.06% | -25.09% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 4.28M | 4.20M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | KMB | UL |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.63 | -0.44 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.79 | -0.64 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both companies show strong equity returns, but Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 104.91% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Unilever (UL) at 31.87% also sits in the top quartile.
KMB
Household & Personal Products industry group
104.91%
- KMB
- 104.91%
- Max
- 42.18%
- Q3
- 30.68%
- Median
- 15.51%
- Q1
- -0.54%
- Min
- -20.43%
UL
Household & Personal Products industry group
31.87%
- Max
- 42.18%
- UL
- 31.87%
- Q3
- 30.68%
- Median
- 15.51%
- Q1
- -0.54%
- Min
- -20.43%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 11.79% and Unilever (UL) at 18.32% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
KMB
Household & Personal Products industry group
11.79%
- Max
- 18.44%
- KMB
- 11.79%
- Q3
- 11.31%
- Median
- 7.12%
- Q1
- 0.51%
- Min
- -9.20%
UL
Household & Personal Products industry group
18.32%
- Max
- 18.44%
- UL
- 18.32%
- Q3
- 11.31%
- Median
- 7.12%
- Q1
- 0.51%
- Min
- -9.20%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Unilever (UL) at 20.35% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 19.00%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
KMB
Household & Personal Products industry group
19.00%
- Max
- 24.77%
- Q3
- 19.31%
- KMB
- 19.00%
- Median
- 14.31%
- Q1
- 11.80%
- Min
- 8.81%
UL
Household & Personal Products industry group
20.35%
- Max
- 24.77%
- UL
- 20.35%
- Q3
- 19.31%
- Median
- 14.31%
- Q1
- 11.80%
- Min
- 8.81%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | KMB | UL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 104.91% | 31.87% |
| ROA (TTM) | 10.20% | 8.29% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.79% | 18.32% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 19.00% | 20.35% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 37.61% | 47.07% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at -2.13% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Unilever (UL) at -3.77% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Unilever (UL) at 67.69% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at -19.60% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | KMB | UL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -2.13% | -3.77% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -6.58% | -5.62% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -19.60% | 67.69% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 1.94% | 8.70% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 0.91 and Unilever (UL) at 0.74 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
KMB
Household & Personal Products industry group
0.91
- Max
- 4.06
- Q3
- 3.23
- Median
- 1.85
- Q1
- 1.01
- KMB
- 0.91
- Min
- 0.66
UL
Household & Personal Products industry group
0.74
- Max
- 4.06
- Q3
- 3.23
- Median
- 1.85
- Q1
- 1.01
- UL
- 0.74
- Min
- 0.66
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Unilever (UL) at 1.75 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 3.49 uses more debt funding than most peers.
KMB
Household & Personal Products industry group
3.49
- KMB
- 3.49
- Max
- 3.49
- Q3
- 1.82
- Median
- 0.80
- Q1
- 0.42
- Min
- 0.06
UL
Household & Personal Products industry group
1.75
- Max
- 3.49
- Q3
- 1.82
- UL
- 1.75
- Median
- 0.80
- Q1
- 0.42
- Min
- 0.06
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | KMB | UL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.91 | 0.74 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 3.49 | 1.75 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.60 | 2.41 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 4.59% and Unilever (UL) at 3.01% offer top-quartile dividend income relative to share price within their industries.
KMB
Household & Personal Products industry group
4.59%
- Max
- 5.29%
- KMB
- 4.59%
- Q3
- 2.91%
- Median
- 1.40%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
UL
Household & Personal Products industry group
3.01%
- Max
- 5.29%
- UL
- 3.01%
- Q3
- 2.91%
- Median
- 1.40%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Kimberly-Clark (KMB) reports payout ratio above 100% at 100.40%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Unilever (UL) reports 78.60%, ranking against industry peers normally.
KMB
Household & Personal Products industry group
100.40%
- Max
- 103.12%
- KMB
- 100.40%
- Q3
- 81.36%
- Median
- 47.99%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
UL
Household & Personal Products industry group
78.60%
- Max
- 103.12%
- Q3
- 81.36%
- UL
- 78.60%
- Median
- 47.99%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | KMB | UL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 4.59% | 3.01% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 100.40% | 78.60% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 21.82 and Unilever (UL) at 20.98 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
KMB
Household & Personal Products industry group
21.82
- Max
- 36.20
- Q3
- 24.73
- KMB
- 21.82
- Median
- 21.81
- Q1
- 16.57
- Min
- 7.57
UL
Household & Personal Products industry group
20.98
- Max
- 36.20
- Q3
- 24.73
- Median
- 21.81
- UL
- 20.98
- Q1
- 16.57
- Min
- 7.57
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 2.21 and Unilever (UL) at 2.64 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
KMB
Household & Personal Products industry group
2.21
- Max
- 4.75
- Q3
- 3.28
- KMB
- 2.21
- Median
- 2.00
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.07
UL
Household & Personal Products industry group
2.64
- Max
- 4.75
- Q3
- 3.28
- UL
- 2.64
- Median
- 2.00
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.07
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Unilever (UL) at 7.15 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 20.98 prices above its benchmark range — KMB looks rich relative to book.
KMB
Household & Personal Products industry group
20.98
- KMB
- 20.98
- Max
- 11.05
- Q3
- 7.77
- Median
- 3.83
- Q1
- 1.41
- Min
- -2.72
UL
Household & Personal Products industry group
7.15
- Max
- 11.05
- Q3
- 7.77
- UL
- 7.15
- Median
- 3.83
- Q1
- 1.41
- Min
- -2.72
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | KMB | UL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 21.82 | 20.98 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.21 | 2.64 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 20.98 | 7.15 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.56% | 5.04% |