Seek Returns logo

KMB vs. UL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at KMB and UL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

KMB is a standard domestic listing, while UL trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolKMBUL
Company NameKimberly-Clark CorporationUnilever PLC
CountryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryHousehold ProductsPersonal Care Products
Market Capitalization44.21 billion USD155.84 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980March 25, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of KMB and UL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

KMB vs. UL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolKMBUL
5-Day Price Return-0.10%3.92%
13-Week Price Return-5.35%-0.93%
26-Week Price Return-1.55%6.66%
52-Week Price Return-7.11%-2.07%
Month-to-Date Return6.93%6.44%
Year-to-Date Return1.69%3.17%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.19M2.02M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.42M2.43M
3-Month Volatility19.14%15.01%
Beta0.310.11

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

KMB

216.14%

Household Products Industry

Max
226.04%
Q3
106.83%
Median
17.55%
Q1
9.51%
Min
-8.31%

In the upper quartile for the Household Products industry, KMB’s Return on Equity of 216.14% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

UL

29.40%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
31.59%
Q3
20.42%
Median
11.01%
Q1
3.26%
Min
-18.42%

In the upper quartile for the Personal Care Products industry, UL’s Return on Equity of 29.40% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

KMB vs. UL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

KMB

12.87%

Household Products Industry

Max
12.48%
Q3
10.54%
Median
9.15%
Q1
8.81%
Min
8.58%

KMB’s Net Profit Margin of 12.87% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

UL

9.29%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
15.12%
Q3
12.06%
Median
9.26%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-0.40%

UL’s Net Profit Margin of 9.29% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

KMB vs. UL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

KMB

16.21%

Household Products Industry

Max
21.54%
Q3
16.06%
Median
13.28%
Q1
12.03%
Min
6.49%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.21% places KMB in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UL

14.58%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
19.80%
Q3
17.96%
Median
13.14%
Q1
7.58%
Min
-4.25%

UL’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.58% is around the midpoint for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

KMB vs. UL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolKMBUL
Return on Equity (TTM)216.14%29.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)14.55%7.13%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.87%9.29%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.21%14.58%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.45%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

KMB

0.77

Household Products Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.04
Median
1.21
Q1
0.76
Min
0.55

KMB’s Current Ratio of 0.77 aligns with the median group of the Household Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UL

0.76

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.26
Q3
2.61
Median
1.74
Q1
1.13
Min
0.76

UL’s Current Ratio of 0.76 falls into the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

KMB vs. UL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

KMB

5.73

Household Products Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
1.47
Median
0.49
Q1
0.16
Min
0.01

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 5.73, KMB operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Household Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

UL

1.80

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
1.13
Q3
0.63
Median
0.26
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.80, UL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Personal Care Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

KMB vs. UL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

KMB

14.18

Household Products Industry

Max
83.52
Q3
68.49
Median
13.94
Q1
9.41
Min
4.76

KMB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.18 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UL

22.79

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
96.53
Q3
59.91
Median
22.25
Q1
7.85
Min
-1.93

UL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 22.79 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

KMB vs. UL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolKMBUL
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.770.76
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.560.55
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)5.731.80
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)14.1822.79

Growth

Revenue Growth

KMB vs. UL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

KMB vs. UL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

KMB

3.71%

Household Products Industry

Max
5.40%
Q3
3.85%
Median
2.82%
Q1
1.83%
Min
0.00%

KMB’s Dividend Yield of 3.71% is consistent with its peers in the Household Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UL

3.42%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.08%
Q3
2.46%
Median
1.82%
Q1
0.83%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.42%, UL offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Personal Care Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

KMB vs. UL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

KMB

67.61%

Household Products Industry

Max
191.34%
Q3
102.63%
Median
70.63%
Q1
34.62%
Min
0.00%

KMB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 67.61% is within the typical range for the Household Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UL

79.51%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
207.61%
Q3
115.17%
Median
69.37%
Q1
47.71%
Min
0.00%

UL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 79.51% is within the typical range for the Personal Care Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

KMB vs. UL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolKMBUL
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.71%3.42%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)67.61%79.51%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

KMB

18.22

Household Products Industry

Max
33.84
Q3
22.61
Median
18.73
Q1
14.08
Min
13.61

KMB’s P/E Ratio of 18.22 is within the middle range for the Household Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UL

23.23

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
36.75
Median
26.49
Q1
22.40
Min
11.12

UL’s P/E Ratio of 23.23 is within the middle range for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

KMB vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

KMB

2.34

Household Products Industry

Max
4.78
Q3
2.70
Median
1.93
Q1
1.27
Min
0.73

KMB’s P/S Ratio of 2.34 aligns with the market consensus for the Household Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UL

2.16

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
2.83
Median
2.07
Q1
1.13
Min
0.00

UL’s P/S Ratio of 2.16 aligns with the market consensus for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

KMB vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

KMB

33.66

Household Products Industry

Max
14.28
Q3
14.28
Median
4.13
Q1
1.75
Min
1.42

At 33.66, KMB’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UL

7.06

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
7.32
Q3
5.26
Median
2.93
Q1
1.84
Min
1.14

UL’s P/B Ratio of 7.06 is in the upper tier for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

KMB vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolKMBUL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)18.2223.23
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.342.16
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)33.667.06
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)21.0620.05