Seek Returns logo

CHD vs. CL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CHD and CL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCHDCL
Company NameChurch & Dwight Co., Inc.Colgate-Palmolive Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryHousehold ProductsHousehold Products
Market Capitalization21.41 billion USD63.04 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980May 2, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CHD and CL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CHD vs. CL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCHDCL
5-Day Price Return2.01%-2.99%
13-Week Price Return-10.68%-15.93%
26-Week Price Return-20.16%-16.76%
52-Week Price Return-14.88%-23.57%
Month-to-Date Return0.31%-2.43%
Year-to-Date Return-16.05%-14.20%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.22M5.88M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.22M5.16M
3-Month Volatility19.29%16.40%
Beta0.460.31

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CHD

12.01%

Household Products Industry

Max
216.14%
Q3
106.01%
Median
19.09%
Q1
9.92%
Min
-6.34%

CHD’s Return on Equity of 12.01% is on par with the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CL

679.67%

Household Products Industry

Max
216.14%
Q3
106.01%
Median
19.09%
Q1
9.92%
Min
-6.34%

CL’s Return on Equity of 679.67% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CHD vs. CL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Household Products industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CHD

8.66%

Household Products Industry

Max
14.55%
Q3
12.50%
Median
8.91%
Q1
8.67%
Min
5.05%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Household Products industry, CHD’s Net Profit Margin of 8.66% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CL

14.55%

Household Products Industry

Max
14.55%
Q3
12.50%
Median
8.91%
Q1
8.67%
Min
5.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.55% places CL in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CHD vs. CL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Household Products industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CHD

11.91%

Household Products Industry

Max
21.76%
Q3
16.17%
Median
13.11%
Q1
12.17%
Min
6.87%

CHD’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.91% is in the lower quartile for the Household Products industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CL

21.17%

Household Products Industry

Max
21.76%
Q3
16.17%
Median
13.11%
Q1
12.17%
Min
6.87%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.17% places CL in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CHD vs. CL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Household Products industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCHDCL
Return on Equity (TTM)12.01%679.67%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.95%17.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.66%14.55%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.91%21.17%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)44.47%60.57%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CHD

1.84

Household Products Industry

Max
2.84
Q3
1.96
Median
1.21
Q1
0.79
Min
0.50

CHD’s Current Ratio of 1.84 aligns with the median group of the Household Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CL

0.89

Household Products Industry

Max
2.84
Q3
1.96
Median
1.21
Q1
0.79
Min
0.50

CL’s Current Ratio of 0.89 aligns with the median group of the Household Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CHD vs. CL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Household Products industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CHD

0.50

Household Products Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
1.47
Median
0.58
Q1
0.16
Min
0.01

CHD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.50 is typical for the Household Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CL

12.48

Household Products Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
1.47
Median
0.58
Q1
0.16
Min
0.01

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 12.48, CL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Household Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CHD vs. CL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Household Products industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CHD

13.69

Household Products Industry

Max
83.52
Q3
68.49
Median
17.04
Q1
9.99
Min
5.60

CHD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.69 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CL

20.49

Household Products Industry

Max
83.52
Q3
68.49
Median
17.04
Q1
9.99
Min
5.60

CL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.49 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CHD vs. CL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Household Products industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCHDCL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.840.89
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.330.57
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.5012.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.6920.49

Growth

Revenue Growth

CHD vs. CL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CHD vs. CL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CHD

1.32%

Household Products Industry

Max
6.79%
Q3
3.95%
Median
2.83%
Q1
2.02%
Min
1.34%

CHD’s Dividend Yield of 1.32% is below the typical range for the Household Products industry. This indicates that shareholder returns are likely driven more by potential capital appreciation than by dividend income.

CL

2.85%

Household Products Industry

Max
6.79%
Q3
3.95%
Median
2.83%
Q1
2.02%
Min
1.34%

CL’s Dividend Yield of 2.85% is consistent with its peers in the Household Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CHD vs. CL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Household Products industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CHD

35.75%

Household Products Industry

Max
187.99%
Q3
110.64%
Median
74.63%
Q1
58.31%
Min
30.76%

CHD’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.75% is in the lower quartile for the Household Products industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CL

61.95%

Household Products Industry

Max
187.99%
Q3
110.64%
Median
74.63%
Q1
58.31%
Min
30.76%

CL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 61.95% is within the typical range for the Household Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CHD vs. CL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Household Products industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCHDCL
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.32%2.85%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)35.75%61.95%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CHD

40.83

Household Products Industry

Max
30.25
Q3
22.11
Median
20.35
Q1
15.19
Min
13.52

At 40.83, CHD’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Household Products industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CL

21.74

Household Products Industry

Max
30.25
Q3
22.11
Median
20.35
Q1
15.19
Min
13.52

CL’s P/E Ratio of 21.74 is within the middle range for the Household Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CHD vs. CL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Household Products industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CHD

3.54

Household Products Industry

Max
4.23
Q3
2.58
Median
1.98
Q1
1.29
Min
1.03

CHD’s P/S Ratio of 3.54 is in the upper echelon for the Household Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CL

3.16

Household Products Industry

Max
4.23
Q3
2.58
Median
1.98
Q1
1.29
Min
1.03

CL’s P/S Ratio of 3.16 is in the upper echelon for the Household Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CHD vs. CL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Household Products industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CHD

5.39

Household Products Industry

Max
46.10
Q3
21.55
Median
5.33
Q1
2.16
Min
1.41

CHD’s P/B Ratio of 5.39 is within the conventional range for the Household Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CL

104.94

Household Products Industry

Max
46.10
Q3
21.55
Median
5.33
Q1
2.16
Min
1.41

At 104.94, CL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CHD vs. CL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Household Products industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCHDCL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)40.8321.74
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.543.16
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.39104.94
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)23.0418.77