CAG vs. PG: Conagra Brands vs. Procter & Gamble Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Conagra Brands (CAG) and Procter & Gamble (PG) share the Consumer Staples sector but sit in different industry groups — CAG in Food, Beverage & Tobacco and PG in Household & Personal Products.

Procter & Gamble (PG) is a mega-cap company at 383.36 billion USD, while Conagra Brands (CAG) is mid-cap at 7.28 billion USD — a noticeably different scale category that can shape how their valuation multiples are read.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Conagra Brands (CAG) reports a negative beta of -0.00, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Procter & Gamble (PG) has a non-negative beta of 0.35.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Conagra Brands (CAG) reports a negative ROE of -24.89%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Procter & Gamble (PG) reports 29.61%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Conagra Brands (CAG) reports a negative net margin of -16.95%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Procter & Gamble (PG) reports 18.23%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Procter & Gamble (PG) at 26.87% turns sales into operating profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while Conagra Brands (CAG) at 11.59% operates around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Procter & Gamble (PG) at 3.26% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Conagra Brands (CAG) at -2.85% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

Procter & Gamble (PG) at 1.69% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Conagra Brands (CAG) at -266.67% falls below its industry range, a notably weak earnings reading.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Conagra Brands (CAG) at 1.10 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Procter & Gamble (PG) at 0.72 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for PG.

Procter & Gamble (PG) at 0.70 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Conagra Brands (CAG) at 1.21 uses more debt funding than most peers.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both Conagra Brands (CAG) at 7.90% and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 2.57% offer top-quartile dividend income relative to share price within their industries.

Both Conagra Brands (CAG) at 79.55% and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 64.62% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Procter & Gamble (PG) trades at 24.91 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Conagra Brands (CAG) has no P/E ratio this period.

Conagra Brands (CAG) at 0.65 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Procter & Gamble (PG) at 4.36 sits in the pricier quartile — PG costs more per dollar of sales.

On P/B ratio, both Conagra Brands (CAG) at 1.14 and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 7.05 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics