CAG vs. PM: Conagra Brands vs. Philip Morris Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Conagra Brands (CAG) and Philip Morris (PM) both fall under the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group, but CAG is classified in Food Products while PM is classified in Tobacco.

Philip Morris (PM) is a mega-cap company at 308.42 billion USD, while Conagra Brands (CAG) is mid-cap at 7.28 billion USD — a noticeably different scale category that can shape how their valuation multiples are read.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Conagra Brands (CAG) reports a negative beta of -0.00, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Philip Morris (PM) has a non-negative beta of 0.35.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Philip Morris (PM) has no ROE value reported for this period; Conagra Brands (CAG) reports a negative figure of -24.89%, which needs context because negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity.

Conagra Brands (CAG) reports a negative net margin of -16.95%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Philip Morris (PM) reports 24.83%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Philip Morris (PM) at 41.94% turns sales into operating profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while Conagra Brands (CAG) at 11.59% operates around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Philip Morris (PM) at 7.31% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Conagra Brands (CAG) at -2.85% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Philip Morris (PM) at 60.26% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Conagra Brands (CAG) at -266.67% falls below its industry range — a large difference in per-share earnings trajectories.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Both Conagra Brands (CAG) at 1.10 and Philip Morris (PM) at 1.02 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

Only one side’s leverage can be read here: Conagra Brands (CAG) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 1.21 against its industry range, while Philip Morris (PM) reports no figure this period.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Conagra Brands (CAG) at 7.90% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Philip Morris (PM) at 2.98% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, CAG the richer one.

Conagra Brands (CAG) at 79.55% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Philip Morris (PM) at 87.74% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Philip Morris (PM) trades at 28.89 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Conagra Brands (CAG) has no P/E ratio this period.

Conagra Brands (CAG) at 0.65 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Philip Morris (PM) at 7.15 clears its benchmark range — PM looks notably rich on sales.

Philip Morris (PM) reports a negative P/B ratio of -38.86, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile Conagra Brands (CAG) reports 1.14, ranking against industry peers normally.

Valuation Metrics