Seek Returns

Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG)

This page compares Colgate-Palmolive (CL) with Procter & Gamble (PG) using historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation metrics.

Company Profile

Colgate-Palmolive (CL) and Procter & Gamble (PG) are both classified in the Household Products sub-industry within the broader Household Products industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

SymbolCLPG
Company NameColgate-Palmolive CompanyThe Procter & Gamble Company
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS Industry GroupHousehold & Personal ProductsHousehold & Personal Products
GICS IndustryHousehold ProductsHousehold Products
GICS Sub-IndustryHousehold ProductsHousehold Products
Market Capitalization72.03 billion USD329.03 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 2, 1973January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

CL
PG
Loading price history…
Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCLPG
5-Day Price Return2.45%-0.66%
13-Week Price Return-5.89%-11.44%
26-Week Price Return13.28%-4.87%
52-Week Price Return-1.87%-14.24%
Month-to-Date Return5.46%-3.94%
Year-to-Date Return13.92%-1.40%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.10M8.06M
3-Month Avg. Volume6.41M10.53M
3-Month Volatility23.42%21.45%
Beta0.320.40

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

Colgate-Palmolive (CL) posts Return on Equity (TTM) of 475.13%, above its industry benchmark range, while Procter & Gamble (PG) at 31.23% sits closer to the industry mid-range.

CL

Household & Personal Products industry group

475.13%

Max
56.82%
Q3
44.03%
Median
14.83%
Q1
8.27%
Min
-15.43%

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

31.23%

Max
56.82%
Q3
44.03%
Median
14.83%
Q1
8.27%
Min
-15.43%
Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

Procter & Gamble (PG) at 19.16% ranks in the top quartile for Net Profit Margin (TTM), ahead of Colgate-Palmolive (CL) at 10.04%, which sits closer to the industry mid-range.

CL

Household & Personal Products industry group

10.04%

Max
19.16%
Q3
11.57%
Median
6.87%
Q1
4.57%
Min
-5.39%

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

19.16%

Max
19.16%
Q3
11.57%
Median
6.87%
Q1
4.57%
Min
-5.39%
Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

Procter & Gamble (PG) at 23.59% ranks in the top quartile for Operating Profit Margin (TTM), ahead of Colgate-Palmolive (CL) at 15.42%, which sits closer to the industry mid-range.

CL

Household & Personal Products industry group

15.42%

Max
23.59%
Q3
16.82%
Median
11.03%
Q1
4.90%
Min
-6.14%

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

23.59%

Max
23.59%
Q3
16.82%
Median
11.03%
Q1
4.90%
Min
-6.14%
Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCLPG
Return on Equity (TTM)475.13%31.23%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.29%13.07%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.04%19.16%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)15.42%23.59%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)60.06%50.88%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Colgate-Palmolive (CL) at 1.02 keeps Current Ratio (MRQ) within its industry mid-range, while Procter & Gamble (PG) at 0.73 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for PG.

CL

Household & Personal Products industry group

1.02

Max
4.51
Q3
2.63
Median
1.79
Q1
0.95
Min
0.73

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

0.73

Max
4.51
Q3
2.63
Median
1.79
Q1
0.95
Min
0.73
Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

Procter & Gamble (PG) at 0.68 is around its industry mid-range for Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ), while Colgate-Palmolive (CL) at 54.99 sits above its industry benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.

CL

Household & Personal Products industry group

54.99

Max
1.83
Q3
1.83
Median
0.76
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

0.68

Max
1.83
Q3
1.83
Median
0.76
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00
Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

Procter & Gamble (PG) leads with Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) of 47.04, above its industry benchmark range, while Colgate-Palmolive (CL) at 18.78 also ranks strongly in the top quartile.

CL

Household & Personal Products industry group

18.78

Max
34.29
Q3
17.39
Median
8.17
Q1
3.35
Min
-3.28

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

47.04

Max
34.29
Q3
17.39
Median
8.17
Q1
3.35
Min
-3.28
Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCLPG
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.020.73
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.670.49
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)54.990.68
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)18.7847.04

Growth

Revenue Growth

Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth at a Glance

SymbolCLPG
Revenue Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)8.41%7.38%
Revenue Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)4.25%3.33%
3-Year Revenue CAGR4.29%1.67%
5-Year Revenue CAGR4.35%3.50%

EPS Growth

Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth at a Glance

SymbolCLPG
EPS Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)-5.22%5.73%
EPS Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)-27.01%8.59%
3-Year EPS CAGR7.29%3.88%
5-Year EPS CAGR-3.47%5.58%

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Colgate-Palmolive (CL) at 2.54% and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 3.09% report Dividend Yield (TTM) near their industry mid-ranges, so neither company stands out strongly from peers on cash yield relative to share price.

CL

Household & Personal Products industry group

2.54%

Max
7.74%
Q3
4.04%
Median
2.05%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

3.09%

Max
7.74%
Q3
4.04%
Median
2.05%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Procter & Gamble (PG) at 61.24% maintains Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) around its industry median — a balanced dividend policy. Colgate-Palmolive (CL) at 61.72% sits outside the typical mid-range, leaning toward more retention or more distribution than the industry median.

CL

Household & Personal Products industry group

61.72%

Max
127.85%
Q3
61.48%
Median
36.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

61.24%

Max
127.85%
Q3
61.48%
Median
36.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCLPG
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.54%3.09%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)61.72%61.24%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

Procter & Gamble (PG) at 19.84 carries typical industry Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM), while Colgate-Palmolive (CL) at 34.60 sits in the higher-multiple quartile — CL carries a higher trailing earnings multiple relative to peers.

CL

Household & Personal Products industry group

34.60

Max
37.54
Q3
25.17
Median
16.40
Q1
13.88
Min
5.28

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

19.84

Max
37.54
Q3
25.17
Median
16.40
Q1
13.88
Min
5.28
Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

Both Colgate-Palmolive (CL) at 3.47 and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 3.80 trade in the higher-multiple quartile for Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) among industry peers, indicating higher trailing revenue multiples than typical peers.

CL

Household & Personal Products industry group

3.47

Max
3.80
Q3
2.10
Median
1.74
Q1
0.71
Min
0.25

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

3.80

Max
3.80
Q3
2.10
Median
1.74
Q1
0.71
Min
0.25
Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

Procter & Gamble (PG) at 6.17 hovers around the typical industry Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ), while Colgate-Palmolive (CL) at 471.59 sits above its industry benchmark range — an elevated book-value multiple for CL relative to peers.

CL

Household & Personal Products industry group

471.59

Max
12.04
Q3
7.18
Median
3.30
Q1
1.57
Min
0.57

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

6.17

Max
12.04
Q3
7.18
Median
3.30
Q1
1.57
Min
0.57
Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCLPG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)34.6019.84
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.473.80
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)471.596.17
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.1721.93