Seek Returns logo

CL vs. PG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CL and PG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCLPG
Company NameColgate-Palmolive CompanyThe Procter & Gamble Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryHousehold ProductsHousehold Products
Market Capitalization69.78 billion USD364.03 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 2, 1973January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CL and PG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CL vs. PG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCLPG
5-Day Price Return1.92%1.25%
13-Week Price Return-3.14%-3.41%
26-Week Price Return0.77%-7.98%
52-Week Price Return-14.75%-6.83%
Month-to-Date Return2.97%3.28%
Year-to-Date Return-5.03%-7.30%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.71M7.48M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.30M8.47M
3-Month Volatility17.38%15.96%
Beta0.350.37

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CL

679.67%

Household Products Industry

Max
226.04%
Q3
106.83%
Median
17.55%
Q1
9.51%
Min
-8.31%

CL’s Return on Equity of 679.67% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

PG

30.78%

Household Products Industry

Max
226.04%
Q3
106.83%
Median
17.55%
Q1
9.51%
Min
-8.31%

PG’s Return on Equity of 30.78% is on par with the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CL vs. PG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Household Products industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CL

14.55%

Household Products Industry

Max
12.48%
Q3
10.54%
Median
9.15%
Q1
8.81%
Min
8.58%

CL’s Net Profit Margin of 14.55% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

PG

18.95%

Household Products Industry

Max
12.48%
Q3
10.54%
Median
9.15%
Q1
8.81%
Min
8.58%

PG’s Net Profit Margin of 18.95% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CL vs. PG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Household Products industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CL

21.17%

Household Products Industry

Max
21.54%
Q3
16.06%
Median
13.28%
Q1
12.03%
Min
6.49%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.17% places CL in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PG

23.32%

Household Products Industry

Max
21.54%
Q3
16.06%
Median
13.28%
Q1
12.03%
Min
6.49%

PG’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.32% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

CL vs. PG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Household Products industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCLPG
Return on Equity (TTM)679.67%30.78%
Return on Assets (TTM)17.38%12.85%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.55%18.95%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.17%23.32%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)60.57%51.34%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CL

0.89

Household Products Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.04
Median
1.21
Q1
0.76
Min
0.55

CL’s Current Ratio of 0.89 aligns with the median group of the Household Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PG

0.70

Household Products Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.04
Median
1.21
Q1
0.76
Min
0.55

PG’s Current Ratio of 0.70 falls into the lower quartile for the Household Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CL vs. PG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Household Products industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CL

12.48

Household Products Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
1.47
Median
0.49
Q1
0.16
Min
0.01

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 12.48, CL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Household Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

PG

0.66

Household Products Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
1.47
Median
0.49
Q1
0.16
Min
0.01

PG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.66 is typical for the Household Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CL vs. PG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Household Products industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CL

20.49

Household Products Industry

Max
83.52
Q3
68.49
Median
13.94
Q1
9.41
Min
4.76

CL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.49 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PG

47.04

Household Products Industry

Max
83.52
Q3
68.49
Median
13.94
Q1
9.41
Min
4.76

PG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 47.04 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CL vs. PG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Household Products industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCLPG
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.890.70
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.570.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)12.480.66
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)20.4947.04

Growth

Revenue Growth

CL vs. PG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CL vs. PG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CL

2.57%

Household Products Industry

Max
5.40%
Q3
3.85%
Median
2.82%
Q1
1.83%
Min
0.00%

CL’s Dividend Yield of 2.57% is consistent with its peers in the Household Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PG

2.69%

Household Products Industry

Max
5.40%
Q3
3.85%
Median
2.82%
Q1
1.83%
Min
0.00%

PG’s Dividend Yield of 2.69% is consistent with its peers in the Household Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CL vs. PG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Household Products industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CL

61.95%

Household Products Industry

Max
191.34%
Q3
102.63%
Median
70.63%
Q1
34.62%
Min
0.00%

CL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 61.95% is within the typical range for the Household Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PG

61.80%

Household Products Industry

Max
191.34%
Q3
102.63%
Median
70.63%
Q1
34.62%
Min
0.00%

PG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 61.80% is within the typical range for the Household Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CL vs. PG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Household Products industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCLPG
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.57%2.69%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)61.95%61.80%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CL

24.08

Household Products Industry

Max
33.84
Q3
22.61
Median
18.73
Q1
14.08
Min
13.61

A P/E Ratio of 24.08 places CL in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

PG

22.97

Household Products Industry

Max
33.84
Q3
22.61
Median
18.73
Q1
14.08
Min
13.61

A P/E Ratio of 22.97 places PG in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CL vs. PG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Household Products industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CL

3.50

Household Products Industry

Max
4.78
Q3
2.70
Median
1.93
Q1
1.27
Min
0.73

CL’s P/S Ratio of 3.50 is in the upper echelon for the Household Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PG

4.35

Household Products Industry

Max
4.78
Q3
2.70
Median
1.93
Q1
1.27
Min
0.73

PG’s P/S Ratio of 4.35 is in the upper echelon for the Household Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CL vs. PG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Household Products industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CL

104.94

Household Products Industry

Max
14.28
Q3
14.28
Median
4.13
Q1
1.75
Min
1.42

At 104.94, CL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PG

7.14

Household Products Industry

Max
14.28
Q3
14.28
Median
4.13
Q1
1.75
Min
1.42

PG’s P/B Ratio of 7.14 is within the conventional range for the Household Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CL vs. PG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Household Products industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCLPG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.0822.97
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.504.35
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)104.947.14
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.7926.12