KMB vs. PG: Kimberly-Clark vs. Procter & Gamble Stock Comparison
How do Kimberly-Clark (KMB) and Procter & Gamble (PG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Kimberly-Clark (KMB) and Procter & Gamble (PG) are both classified in the Household Products sub-industry within the broader Household Products industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
| Profile Item | KMB | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Kimberly-Clark Corporation | Procter & Gamble Co |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Consumer Staples | Consumer Staples |
| GICS Industry Group | Household & Personal Products | Household & Personal Products |
| GICS Industry | Household Products | Household Products |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Household Products | Household Products |
| Market Capitalization | 36.71 billion USD | 336.00 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | January 2, 1962 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | KMB | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -13.19% | -3.21% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -0.75% | 0.14% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -0.42% | 2.73% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | KMB | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 27.18% | 19.68% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.26 | 0.38 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -34.06% | -23.77% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 4.28M | 8.83M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | KMB | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.63 | -0.36 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.79 | -0.52 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 104.91% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Procter & Gamble (PG) at 30.29%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
KMB
Household & Personal Products industry group
104.91%
- KMB
- 104.91%
- Max
- 42.18%
- Q3
- 30.68%
- Median
- 15.51%
- Q1
- -0.54%
- Min
- -20.43%
PG
Household & Personal Products industry group
30.29%
- Max
- 42.18%
- Q3
- 30.68%
- PG
- 30.29%
- Median
- 15.51%
- Q1
- -0.54%
- Min
- -20.43%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 11.79% and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 18.44% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
KMB
Household & Personal Products industry group
11.79%
- Max
- 18.44%
- KMB
- 11.79%
- Q3
- 11.31%
- Median
- 7.12%
- Q1
- 0.51%
- Min
- -9.20%
PG
Household & Personal Products industry group
18.44%
- PG
- 18.44%
- Max
- 18.44%
- Q3
- 11.31%
- Median
- 7.12%
- Q1
- 0.51%
- Min
- -9.20%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Procter & Gamble (PG) at 22.09% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 19.00%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
KMB
Household & Personal Products industry group
19.00%
- Max
- 24.77%
- Q3
- 19.31%
- KMB
- 19.00%
- Median
- 14.31%
- Q1
- 11.80%
- Min
- 8.81%
PG
Household & Personal Products industry group
22.09%
- Max
- 24.77%
- PG
- 22.09%
- Q3
- 19.31%
- Median
- 14.31%
- Q1
- 11.80%
- Min
- 8.81%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | KMB | PG |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 104.91% | 30.29% |
| ROA (TTM) | 10.20% | 10.72% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.79% | 18.44% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 19.00% | 22.09% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 37.61% | 50.87% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Procter & Gamble (PG) at 3.26% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at -2.13% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for PG.
EPS Growth
Procter & Gamble (PG) at 1.69% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at -19.60% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | KMB | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -2.13% | 3.26% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -6.58% | 2.00% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -19.60% | 1.69% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 1.94% | 3.91% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 0.91 and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 0.68 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
KMB
Household & Personal Products industry group
0.91
- Max
- 4.06
- Q3
- 3.23
- Median
- 1.85
- Q1
- 1.01
- KMB
- 0.91
- Min
- 0.66
PG
Household & Personal Products industry group
0.68
- Max
- 4.06
- Q3
- 3.23
- Median
- 1.85
- Q1
- 1.01
- PG
- 0.68
- Min
- 0.66
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Procter & Gamble (PG) at 0.64 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 3.49 uses more debt funding than most peers.
KMB
Household & Personal Products industry group
3.49
- KMB
- 3.49
- Max
- 3.49
- Q3
- 1.82
- Median
- 0.80
- Q1
- 0.42
- Min
- 0.06
PG
Household & Personal Products industry group
0.64
- Max
- 3.49
- Q3
- 1.82
- Median
- 0.80
- PG
- 0.64
- Q1
- 0.42
- Min
- 0.06
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | KMB | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.91 | 0.68 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 3.49 | 0.64 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.60 | 1.01 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 4.59% and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 2.95% offer top-quartile dividend income relative to share price within their industries.
KMB
Household & Personal Products industry group
4.59%
- Max
- 5.29%
- KMB
- 4.59%
- Q3
- 2.91%
- Median
- 1.40%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PG
Household & Personal Products industry group
2.95%
- Max
- 5.29%
- PG
- 2.95%
- Q3
- 2.91%
- Median
- 1.40%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Kimberly-Clark (KMB) reports payout ratio above 100% at 100.40%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Procter & Gamble (PG) reports 64.33%, ranking against industry peers normally.
KMB
Household & Personal Products industry group
100.40%
- Max
- 103.12%
- KMB
- 100.40%
- Q3
- 81.36%
- Median
- 47.99%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PG
Household & Personal Products industry group
64.33%
- Max
- 103.12%
- Q3
- 81.36%
- PG
- 64.33%
- Median
- 47.99%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | KMB | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 4.59% | 2.95% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 100.40% | 64.33% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 21.82 and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 21.80 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
KMB
Household & Personal Products industry group
21.82
- Max
- 36.20
- Q3
- 24.73
- KMB
- 21.82
- Median
- 21.81
- Q1
- 16.57
- Min
- 7.57
PG
Household & Personal Products industry group
21.80
- Max
- 36.20
- Q3
- 24.73
- Median
- 21.81
- PG
- 21.80
- Q1
- 16.57
- Min
- 7.57
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 2.21 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Procter & Gamble (PG) at 3.87 sits in the pricier quartile — PG costs more per dollar of sales.
KMB
Household & Personal Products industry group
2.21
- Max
- 4.75
- Q3
- 3.28
- KMB
- 2.21
- Median
- 2.00
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.07
PG
Household & Personal Products industry group
3.87
- Max
- 4.75
- PG
- 3.87
- Q3
- 3.28
- Median
- 2.00
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.07
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Procter & Gamble (PG) at 6.30 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 20.98 prices above its benchmark range — KMB looks rich relative to book.
KMB
Household & Personal Products industry group
20.98
- KMB
- 20.98
- Max
- 11.05
- Q3
- 7.77
- Median
- 3.83
- Q1
- 1.41
- Min
- -2.72
PG
Household & Personal Products industry group
6.30
- Max
- 11.05
- Q3
- 7.77
- PG
- 6.30
- Median
- 3.83
- Q1
- 1.41
- Min
- -2.72
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | KMB | PG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 21.82 | 21.80 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.21 | 3.87 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 20.98 | 6.30 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.56% | 3.95% |