Kimberly-Clark (KMB) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG)
This page compares Kimberly-Clark (KMB) with Procter & Gamble (PG) using performance and risk, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividends, and valuation metrics.
Company Profile
Kimberly-Clark (KMB) and Procter & Gamble (PG) are both classified in the Household Products sub-industry within the broader Household Products industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
| Symbol | KMB | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Kimberly-Clark Corporation | Procter & Gamble Co |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Consumer Staples | Consumer Staples |
| GICS Industry Group | Household & Personal Products | Household & Personal Products |
| GICS Industry | Household Products | Household Products |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Household Products | Household Products |
| Market Capitalization | 33.37 billion USD | 346.19 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | January 2, 1962 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
Both Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 19.44 and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 21.74 post Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) near the typical industry midpoint — neither company stands out strongly from peers on trailing earnings multiple.
KMB
Household & Personal Products industry group
19.44
- Max
- 38.02
- Q3
- 24.79
- Median
- 18.50
- Q1
- 14.84
- Min
- 4.98
PG
Household & Personal Products industry group
21.74
- Max
- 38.02
- Q3
- 24.79
- Median
- 18.50
- Q1
- 14.84
- Min
- 4.98
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 2.02 is priced about in line with its industry on Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM), while Procter & Gamble (PG) at 3.99 sits in the pricier quartile — PG costs more per dollar of sales.
KMB
Household & Personal Products industry group
2.02
- Max
- 4.52
- Q3
- 3.07
- Median
- 1.76
- Q1
- 0.70
- Min
- 0.23
PG
Household & Personal Products industry group
3.99
- Max
- 4.52
- Q3
- 3.07
- Median
- 1.76
- Q1
- 0.70
- Min
- 0.23
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
Procter & Gamble (PG) at 6.44 sits near its industry’s typical Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ), while Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 18.58 prices above its benchmark range — KMB looks rich relative to book.
KMB
Household & Personal Products industry group
18.58
- Max
- 12.50
- Q3
- 6.73
- Median
- 2.14
- Q1
- 1.20
- Min
- -2.65
PG
Household & Personal Products industry group
6.44
- Max
- 12.50
- Q3
- 6.73
- Median
- 2.14
- Q1
- 1.20
- Min
- -2.65
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | KMB | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 19.44 | 21.74 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 2.02 | 3.99 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 18.58 | 6.44 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield | 3.16% | 3.68% |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
Kimberly-Clark (KMB) leads with Return on Equity (TTM) of 111.73%, above its industry benchmark range, while Procter & Gamble (PG) at 31.11% also ranks strongly in the top quartile.
KMB
Household & Personal Products industry group
111.73%
- Max
- 31.30%
- Q3
- 30.96%
- Median
- 15.00%
- Q1
- 1.55%
- Min
- -13.94%
PG
Household & Personal Products industry group
31.11%
- Max
- 31.30%
- Q3
- 30.96%
- Median
- 15.00%
- Q1
- 1.55%
- Min
- -13.94%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 12.80% and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 19.16% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top Net Profit Margin (TTM) quartile of their industries.
KMB
Household & Personal Products industry group
12.80%
- Max
- 19.16%
- Q3
- 11.34%
- Median
- 6.79%
- Q1
- 2.51%
- Min
- -9.20%
PG
Household & Personal Products industry group
19.16%
- Max
- 19.16%
- Q3
- 11.34%
- Median
- 6.79%
- Q1
- 2.51%
- Min
- -9.20%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
Procter & Gamble (PG) at 23.05% operates in the top Operating Profit Margin (TTM) quartile, ahead of Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 19.65%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
KMB
Household & Personal Products industry group
19.65%
- Max
- 23.17%
- Q3
- 19.85%
- Median
- 12.60%
- Q1
- 7.57%
- Min
- -5.14%
PG
Household & Personal Products industry group
23.05%
- Max
- 23.17%
- Q3
- 19.85%
- Median
- 12.60%
- Q1
- 7.57%
- Min
- -5.14%
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | KMB | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 111.73% | 31.11% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 10.16% | 10.93% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 12.80% | 19.16% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 19.65% | 23.05% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 37.15% | 50.98% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Revenue Growth at a Glance
| Symbol | KMB | PG |
|---|---|---|
| 1-Year Revenue Growth | -2.13% | 0.29% |
| 3-Year Revenue CAGR | -6.58% | 1.67% |
EPS Growth
EPS Growth at a Glance
| Symbol | KMB | PG |
|---|---|---|
| 1-Year EPS Growth | -19.60% | 8.14% |
| 3-Year EPS CAGR | 1.94% | 3.86% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 0.77 and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 0.73 run Current Ratio (MRQ) in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
KMB
Household & Personal Products industry group
0.77
- Max
- 6.27
- Q3
- 3.17
- Median
- 2.05
- Q1
- 1.00
- Min
- 0.73
PG
Household & Personal Products industry group
0.73
- Max
- 6.27
- Q3
- 3.17
- Median
- 2.05
- Q1
- 1.00
- Min
- 0.73
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
Procter & Gamble (PG) at 0.68 is around its industry mid-range for Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ), while Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 3.71 sits above its industry benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.
KMB
Household & Personal Products industry group
3.71
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.61
- Median
- 0.81
- Q1
- 0.40
- Min
- 0.02
PG
Household & Personal Products industry group
0.68
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.61
- Median
- 0.81
- Q1
- 0.40
- Min
- 0.02
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | KMB | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.77 | 0.73 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 3.71 | 0.68 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.96 | 0.99 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 5.09% reports Dividend Yield (TTM) in the top quartile of industry peers, ahead of Procter & Gamble (PG) at 2.86%, which sits around the industry mid-range.
KMB
Household & Personal Products industry group
5.09%
- Max
- 6.10%
- Q3
- 3.10%
- Median
- 1.62%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PG
Household & Personal Products industry group
2.86%
- Max
- 6.10%
- Q3
- 3.10%
- Median
- 1.62%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Procter & Gamble (PG) at 61.80% maintains Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) around its industry median — a balanced dividend policy. Kimberly-Clark (KMB) at 97.87% sits outside the typical mid-range, leaning toward more retention or more distribution than the industry median.
KMB
Household & Personal Products industry group
97.87%
- Max
- 98.51%
- Q3
- 71.90%
- Median
- 37.08%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PG
Household & Personal Products industry group
61.80%
- Max
- 98.51%
- Q3
- 71.90%
- Median
- 37.08%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividends at a Glance
| Symbol | KMB | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 5.09% | 2.86% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 97.87% | 61.80% |
Performance & Risk
Performance & Risk at a Glance
| Symbol | KMB | PG |
|---|---|---|
| 1-Year Return | -23.22% | -8.99% |
| 1-Year Volatility | 25.67% | 18.67% |
| Beta | 0.28 | 0.39 |
| 3-Month Avg. Volume | 4.79M | 9.52M |