BNT vs. PUK: Brookfield Wealth vs. Prudential Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Brookfield Wealth (BNT) and Prudential (PUK) are both classified in the Life & Health Insurance sub-industry within the broader Insurance industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Prudential (PUK) has more than two decades of public-market history since June 29, 2000, whereas Brookfield Wealth (BNT) listed on June 28, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Brookfield Wealth (BNT) trades as ordinary local shares, while Prudential (PUK) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Brookfield Wealth (BNT) has an aggressive beta of 1.57, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Prudential (PUK) is defensive at 0.64 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Prudential (PUK) trades around 1.21M shares per day on average, while Brookfield Wealth (BNT) sees only 15.15K — a volume gap that can matter for position sizing, exit liquidity, and order execution.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Prudential (PUK) at 18.74% is around its peer norm for ROE, while Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at 1.05% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.

Prudential (PUK) at 25.49% keeps a top-quartile share of each sales dollar as profit, while Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at 1.06% keeps a bottom-quartile share.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Brookfield Wealth (BNT) in Insurance and Prudential (PUK) in Insurance, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Prudential (PUK) at 68.98% delivers above-range revenue growth, while Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at -20.37% falls into the bottom quartile — a wide split in revenue momentum.

Prudential (PUK) at 82.74% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at -53.90% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Brookfield Wealth (BNT) in Insurance and Prudential (PUK) in Insurance both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Brookfield Wealth (BNT) in Insurance and Prudential (PUK) in Insurance run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at 0.62% and Prudential (PUK) at 1.10% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

Both Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at 30.95% and Prudential (PUK) at 18.71% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Prudential (PUK) at 8.72 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at 49.19 trades above its peer range — a wide earnings-valuation gap relative to industry peers.

On P/S ratio, both Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at 0.96 and Prudential (PUK) at 2.12 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at 0.84 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile relative to book while Prudential (PUK) at 6.29 prices above its industry range — a wide valuation gap against assets.

Valuation Metrics