Seek Returns

MRSH vs. PUK: Marsh & McLennan vs. Prudential Stock Comparison

How do Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) and Prudential (PUK) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) and Prudential (PUK) both belong to the Insurance industry, though MRSH is classified under Insurance Brokers while PUK falls under Life & Health Insurance.

Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) trades as ordinary local shares, while Prudential (PUK) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) and Prudential (PUK)
Profile ItemMRSHPUK
NameMarsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.Prudential plc ADR
Country/RegionUnited StatesHong Kong
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS Industry GroupInsuranceInsurance
GICS IndustryInsuranceInsurance
GICS Sub-IndustryInsurance BrokersLife & Health Insurance
Market Capitalization97.39 billion USD30.28 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973June 29, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

MRSH
PUK
GSPC
Loading price history…
Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) vs. Prudential (PUK), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) and Prudential (PUK). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) and Prudential (PUK). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) and Prudential (PUK)
MetricMRSHPUK
Total Return (1Y)16.87%-7.39%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)3.11%8.09%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)6.23%-6.78%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

MRSH
PUK
GSPC
Loading price history…
Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) vs. Prudential (PUK), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) and Prudential (PUK). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) and Prudential (PUK)
MetricMRSHPUK
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)26.15%29.81%
Beta (5Y)0.510.64
Max Drawdown (5Y)-34.36%-62.24%
Avg. Volume (3M)2.43M1.21M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
MRSH and PUK are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) and Prudential (PUK)
MetricMRSHPUK
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.48-0.39
Sortino Ratio (1Y)0.74-0.54

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 27.24% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Prudential (PUK) at 18.74% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for MRSH.

MRSH

Insurance industry group

27.24%

Max
41.68%
MRSH
27.24%
Q3
22.04%
Median
14.81%
Q1
8.79%
Min
-10.66%

PUK

Insurance industry group

18.74%

Max
41.68%
Q3
22.04%
PUK
18.74%
Median
14.81%
Q1
8.79%
Min
-10.66%
Loading chart…
Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) vs. Prudential (PUK): A comparison of their ROE against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Prudential (PUK) at 25.49% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 14.20%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

MRSH

Insurance industry group

14.20%

Max
29.92%
Q3
17.03%
MRSH
14.20%
Median
10.97%
Q1
6.21%
Min
-4.68%

PUK

Insurance industry group

25.49%

Max
29.92%
PUK
25.49%
Q3
17.03%
Median
10.97%
Q1
6.21%
Min
-4.68%
Loading chart…
Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) vs. Prudential (PUK): A comparison of their net margin against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) in Insurance and Prudential (PUK) in Insurance, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) and Prudential (PUK)
MetricMRSHPUK
ROE (TTM)27.24%18.74%
ROA (TTM)7.35%1.60%
Net Margin (TTM)14.20%25.49%
Operating Margin (TTM)----
Gross Margin (TTM)----

Growth

Revenue Growth

Prudential (PUK) at 68.98% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 10.32%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Loading chart…
Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) vs. Prudential (PUK): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Prudential (PUK) at 82.74% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 3.06% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for PUK.

Loading chart…
Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) vs. Prudential (PUK): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) and Prudential (PUK)
MetricMRSHPUK
Revenue Growth (YoY)10.32%68.98%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)9.20%--
EPS Growth (YoY)3.06%82.74%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)11.75%61.41%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) in Insurance and Prudential (PUK) in Insurance both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) in Insurance and Prudential (PUK) in Insurance run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) and Prudential (PUK)
MetricMRSHPUK
Current Ratio (MRQ)----
Debt / Equity (MRQ)----
Net Debt / EBITDA----

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 1.80% and Prudential (PUK) at 1.10% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

MRSH

Insurance industry group

1.80%

Max
5.12%
Q3
2.15%
MRSH
1.80%
Median
0.98%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PUK

Insurance industry group

1.10%

Max
5.12%
Q3
2.15%
PUK
1.10%
Median
0.98%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) vs. Prudential (PUK): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Prudential (PUK) at 18.71% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 44.14% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

MRSH

Insurance industry group

44.14%

Max
76.67%
MRSH
44.14%
Q3
35.18%
Median
14.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PUK

Insurance industry group

18.71%

Max
76.67%
Q3
35.18%
PUK
18.71%
Median
14.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) vs. Prudential (PUK): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) and Prudential (PUK)
MetricMRSHPUK
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.80%1.10%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)44.14%18.71%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Prudential (PUK) at 8.72 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 24.50 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.

MRSH

Insurance industry group

24.50

Max
28.37
MRSH
24.50
Q3
18.75
Median
12.23
Q1
9.08
Min
2.32

PUK

Insurance industry group

8.72

Max
28.37
Q3
18.75
Median
12.23
Q1
9.08
PUK
8.72
Min
2.32
Loading chart…
Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) vs. Prudential (PUK): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Prudential (PUK) at 2.12 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 3.42 sits in the pricier quartile — MRSH costs more per dollar of sales.

MRSH

Insurance industry group

3.42

Max
4.03
MRSH
3.42
Q3
2.25
Median
1.23
Q1
0.85
Min
0.07

PUK

Insurance industry group

2.12

Max
4.03
Q3
2.25
PUK
2.12
Median
1.23
Q1
0.85
Min
0.07
Loading chart…
Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) vs. Prudential (PUK): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Measured against book value, both Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) at 6.64 and Prudential (PUK) at 6.29 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.

MRSH

Insurance industry group

6.64

MRSH
6.64
Max
5.07
Q3
2.79
Median
1.76
Q1
1.23
Min
0.30

PUK

Insurance industry group

6.29

PUK
6.29
Max
5.07
Q3
2.79
Median
1.76
Q1
1.23
Min
0.30
Loading chart…
Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) vs. Prudential (PUK): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Insurance industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) and Prudential (PUK)
MetricMRSHPUK
P/E Ratio (TTM)24.508.72
P/S Ratio (TTM)3.422.12
P/B Ratio (MRQ)6.646.29
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)----