BNT vs. CB: Brookfield Wealth vs. Chubb Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Brookfield Wealth (BNT) and Chubb (CB) both belong to the Insurance industry, though BNT is classified under Life & Health Insurance while CB falls under Property & Casualty Insurance.

Chubb (CB) has more than two decades of public-market history since March 25, 1993, whereas Brookfield Wealth (BNT) listed on June 28, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Brookfield Wealth (BNT) has an aggressive beta of 1.57, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Chubb (CB) is defensive at 0.28 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Chubb (CB) trades around 1.60M shares per day on average, while Brookfield Wealth (BNT) sees only 15.15K — a volume gap that can matter for position sizing, exit liquidity, and order execution.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Chubb (CB) at 14.25% is around its peer norm for ROE, while Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at 1.05% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.

Chubb (CB) at 18.13% keeps a top-quartile share of each sales dollar as profit, while Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at 1.06% keeps a bottom-quartile share.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Brookfield Wealth (BNT) in Insurance and Chubb (CB) in Insurance, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Chubb (CB) at 6.98% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at -20.37% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Chubb (CB) at 14.08% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at -53.90% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Brookfield Wealth (BNT) in Insurance and Chubb (CB) in Insurance both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Brookfield Wealth (BNT) in Insurance and Chubb (CB) in Insurance run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at 0.62% and Chubb (CB) at 1.07% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

Both Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at 30.95% and Chubb (CB) at 13.95% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Chubb (CB) at 12.79 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at 49.19 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for BNT’s trailing earnings.

On P/S ratio, both Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at 0.96 and Chubb (CB) at 2.25 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at 0.84 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while Chubb (CB) at 1.91 is valued near its industry’s middle — BNT is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.

Valuation Metrics