BHP vs. SHW: BHP vs. Sherwin-Williams Stock Comparison
How do BHP (BHP) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
BHP (BHP) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) both fall under the Materials industry group, but BHP is classified in Metals & Mining while SHW is classified in Chemicals.
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) trades as ordinary local shares, while BHP (BHP) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | BHP | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Name | BHP Group Ltd. | The Sherwin-Williams Company |
| Country/Region | Australia | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Metals & Mining | Chemicals |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Diversified Metals & Mining | Specialty Chemicals |
| Market Capitalization | 218.22 billion USD | 83.71 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | BHP | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 72.94% | 4.84% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 16.45% | 8.13% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 11.10% | 4.38% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | BHP | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 32.81% | 27.32% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.75 | 1.09 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -37.21% | -42.46% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.66M | 2.40M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | BHP | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 2.10 | 0.03 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 3.17 | 0.05 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both companies show strong equity returns, but Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 65.12% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; BHP (BHP) at 24.71% also sits in the top quartile.
BHP
Materials industry group
24.71%
- Max
- 51.93%
- BHP
- 24.71%
- Q3
- 18.20%
- Median
- 5.99%
- Q1
- -9.69%
- Min
- -50.42%
SHW
Materials industry group
65.12%
- SHW
- 65.12%
- Max
- 51.93%
- Q3
- 18.20%
- Median
- 5.99%
- Q1
- -9.69%
- Min
- -50.42%
Net Margin (TTM)
BHP (BHP) at 18.97% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 11.01%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
BHP
Materials industry group
18.97%
- Max
- 35.99%
- BHP
- 18.97%
- Q3
- 14.91%
- Median
- 3.99%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -21.87%
SHW
Materials industry group
11.01%
- Max
- 35.99%
- Q3
- 14.91%
- SHW
- 11.01%
- Median
- 3.99%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -21.87%
Operating Margin (TTM)
BHP (BHP) at 40.73% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 18.12%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
BHP
Materials industry group
40.73%
- Max
- 66.92%
- BHP
- 40.73%
- Q3
- 27.44%
- Median
- 10.11%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -32.85%
SHW
Materials industry group
18.12%
- Max
- 66.92%
- Q3
- 27.44%
- SHW
- 18.12%
- Median
- 10.11%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -32.85%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | BHP | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 24.71% | 65.12% |
| ROA (TTM) | 12.23% | 9.52% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 18.97% | 11.01% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 40.73% | 18.12% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 83.09% | 48.98% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 2.06% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while BHP (BHP) at -7.90% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both BHP (BHP) at 14.08% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at -2.75% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | BHP | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -7.90% | 2.06% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -7.66% | 2.10% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 14.08% | -2.75% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -33.72% | 9.95% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
BHP (BHP) at 1.65 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.73 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for SHW.
BHP
Materials industry group
1.65
- Max
- 6.31
- Q3
- 3.49
- Median
- 2.23
- BHP
- 1.65
- Q1
- 1.42
- Min
- 0.12
SHW
Materials industry group
0.73
- Max
- 6.31
- Q3
- 3.49
- Median
- 2.23
- Q1
- 1.42
- SHW
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.12
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
BHP (BHP) at 0.53 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.90 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.
BHP
Materials industry group
0.53
- Max
- 2.02
- Q3
- 0.92
- BHP
- 0.53
- Median
- 0.44
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
SHW
Materials industry group
3.90
- SHW
- 3.90
- Max
- 2.02
- Q3
- 0.92
- Median
- 0.44
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | BHP | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.65 | 0.73 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.53 | 3.90 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.60 | 3.13 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both BHP (BHP) at 1.60% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.92% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
BHP
Materials industry group
1.60%
- Max
- 4.91%
- Q3
- 1.96%
- BHP
- 1.60%
- Median
- 0.46%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SHW
Materials industry group
0.92%
- Max
- 4.91%
- Q3
- 1.96%
- SHW
- 0.92%
- Median
- 0.46%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 29.34% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while BHP (BHP) at 54.64% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
BHP
Materials industry group
54.64%
- Max
- 97.44%
- BHP
- 54.64%
- Q3
- 40.00%
- Median
- 9.04%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SHW
Materials industry group
29.34%
- Max
- 97.44%
- Q3
- 40.00%
- SHW
- 29.34%
- Median
- 9.04%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | BHP | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.60% | 0.92% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 54.64% | 29.34% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
BHP (BHP) at 20.65 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 31.75 sits in the richer quartile — SHW needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
BHP
Materials industry group
20.65
- Max
- 58.49
- Q3
- 31.23
- BHP
- 20.65
- Median
- 20.26
- Q1
- 12.90
- Min
- 4.66
SHW
Materials industry group
31.75
- Max
- 58.49
- SHW
- 31.75
- Q3
- 31.23
- Median
- 20.26
- Q1
- 12.90
- Min
- 4.66
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.43 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while BHP (BHP) at 4.04 sits in the pricier quartile — BHP costs more per dollar of sales.
BHP
Materials industry group
4.04
- Max
- 8.72
- BHP
- 4.04
- Q3
- 4.01
- Median
- 1.86
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
SHW
Materials industry group
3.43
- Max
- 8.72
- Q3
- 4.01
- SHW
- 3.43
- Median
- 1.86
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both look rich against book: BHP (BHP) at 4.33 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 18.47 prices even higher, above its industry range.
BHP
Materials industry group
4.33
- Max
- 7.76
- BHP
- 4.33
- Q3
- 3.99
- Median
- 2.25
- Q1
- 1.38
- Min
- -0.30
SHW
Materials industry group
18.47
- SHW
- 18.47
- Max
- 7.76
- Q3
- 3.99
- Median
- 2.25
- Q1
- 1.38
- Min
- -0.30
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BHP | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 20.65 | 31.75 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 4.04 | 3.43 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 4.33 | 18.47 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.73% | 2.99% |