SCCO vs. SHW: Southern Copper vs. Sherwin-Williams Stock Comparison
How do Southern Copper (SCCO) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Southern Copper (SCCO) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) both fall under the Materials industry group, but SCCO is classified in Metals & Mining while SHW is classified in Chemicals.
| Profile Item | SCCO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Southern Copper Corporation | The Sherwin-Williams Company |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Metals & Mining | Chemicals |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Copper | Specialty Chemicals |
| Market Capitalization | 145.05 billion USD | 83.71 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | January 5, 1996 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | SCCO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 117.10% | 4.84% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 35.82% | 8.13% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 29.67% | 4.38% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | SCCO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 51.05% | 27.32% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.12 | 1.09 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -43.07% | -42.46% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.32M | 2.40M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | SCCO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 2.21 | 0.03 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 3.35 | 0.05 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both companies show strong equity returns, but Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 65.12% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Southern Copper (SCCO) at 49.90% also sits in the top quartile.
SCCO
Materials industry group
49.90%
- Max
- 51.93%
- SCCO
- 49.90%
- Q3
- 18.20%
- Median
- 5.99%
- Q1
- -9.69%
- Min
- -50.42%
SHW
Materials industry group
65.12%
- SHW
- 65.12%
- Max
- 51.93%
- Q3
- 18.20%
- Median
- 5.99%
- Q1
- -9.69%
- Min
- -50.42%
Net Margin (TTM)
Southern Copper (SCCO) at 35.87% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 11.01%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
SCCO
Materials industry group
35.87%
- Max
- 35.99%
- SCCO
- 35.87%
- Q3
- 14.91%
- Median
- 3.99%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -21.87%
SHW
Materials industry group
11.01%
- Max
- 35.99%
- Q3
- 14.91%
- SHW
- 11.01%
- Median
- 3.99%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -21.87%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Southern Copper (SCCO) at 61.16% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 18.12%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
SCCO
Materials industry group
61.16%
- Max
- 66.92%
- SCCO
- 61.16%
- Q3
- 27.44%
- Median
- 10.11%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -32.85%
SHW
Materials industry group
18.12%
- Max
- 66.92%
- Q3
- 27.44%
- SHW
- 18.12%
- Median
- 10.11%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -32.85%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | SCCO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 49.90% | 65.12% |
| ROA (TTM) | 25.71% | 9.52% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 35.87% | 11.01% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 61.16% | 18.12% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 64.50% | 48.98% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Southern Copper (SCCO) at 17.38% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 2.06% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Southern Copper (SCCO) at 25.41% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at -2.75% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | SCCO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 17.38% | 2.06% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 10.13% | 2.10% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 25.41% | -2.75% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 17.64% | 9.95% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Southern Copper (SCCO) at 5.06 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.73 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.
SCCO
Materials industry group
5.06
- Max
- 6.31
- SCCO
- 5.06
- Q3
- 3.49
- Median
- 2.23
- Q1
- 1.42
- Min
- 0.12
SHW
Materials industry group
0.73
- Max
- 6.31
- Q3
- 3.49
- Median
- 2.23
- Q1
- 1.42
- SHW
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.12
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Southern Copper (SCCO) at 0.67 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.90 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.
SCCO
Materials industry group
0.67
- Max
- 2.02
- Q3
- 0.92
- SCCO
- 0.67
- Median
- 0.44
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
SHW
Materials industry group
3.90
- SHW
- 3.90
- Max
- 2.02
- Q3
- 0.92
- Median
- 0.44
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | SCCO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 5.06 | 0.73 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.67 | 3.90 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.12 | 3.13 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Southern Copper (SCCO) at 2.06% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.92% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, SCCO the richer one.
SCCO
Materials industry group
2.06%
- Max
- 4.91%
- SCCO
- 2.06%
- Q3
- 1.96%
- Median
- 0.46%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SHW
Materials industry group
0.92%
- Max
- 4.91%
- Q3
- 1.96%
- SHW
- 0.92%
- Median
- 0.46%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 29.34% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Southern Copper (SCCO) at 53.94% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
SCCO
Materials industry group
53.94%
- Max
- 97.44%
- SCCO
- 53.94%
- Q3
- 40.00%
- Median
- 9.04%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SHW
Materials industry group
29.34%
- Max
- 97.44%
- Q3
- 40.00%
- SHW
- 29.34%
- Median
- 9.04%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | SCCO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.06% | 0.92% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 53.94% | 29.34% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Southern Copper (SCCO) at 25.91 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 31.75 sits in the richer quartile — SHW needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
SCCO
Materials industry group
25.91
- Max
- 58.49
- Q3
- 31.23
- SCCO
- 25.91
- Median
- 20.26
- Q1
- 12.90
- Min
- 4.66
SHW
Materials industry group
31.75
- Max
- 58.49
- SHW
- 31.75
- Q3
- 31.23
- Median
- 20.26
- Q1
- 12.90
- Min
- 4.66
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.43 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Southern Copper (SCCO) at 9.19 clears its benchmark range — SCCO looks notably rich on sales.
SCCO
Materials industry group
9.19
- SCCO
- 9.19
- Max
- 8.72
- Q3
- 4.01
- Median
- 1.86
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
SHW
Materials industry group
3.43
- Max
- 8.72
- Q3
- 4.01
- SHW
- 3.43
- Median
- 1.86
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Measured against book value, both Southern Copper (SCCO) at 12.22 and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 18.47 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.
SCCO
Materials industry group
12.22
- SCCO
- 12.22
- Max
- 7.76
- Q3
- 3.99
- Median
- 2.25
- Q1
- 1.38
- Min
- -0.30
SHW
Materials industry group
18.47
- SHW
- 18.47
- Max
- 7.76
- Q3
- 3.99
- Median
- 2.25
- Q1
- 1.38
- Min
- -0.30
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | SCCO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 25.91 | 31.75 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 9.19 | 3.43 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 12.22 | 18.47 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.52% | 2.99% |