SCCO vs. SHW: Southern Copper vs. Sherwin-Williams Stock Comparison
How do Southern Copper (SCCO) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Southern Copper (SCCO) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) both fall under the Materials industry group, but SCCO is classified in Metals & Mining while SHW is classified in Chemicals.
| Profile Item | SCCO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Southern Copper Corporation | The Sherwin-Williams Company |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Metals & Mining | Chemicals |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Copper | Specialty Chemicals |
| Market Capitalization | 156.86 billion USD | 78.54 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | January 5, 1996 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | SCCO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 103.73% | -5.82% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 40.42% | 6.76% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 30.93% | 3.40% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | SCCO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 50.61% | 25.52% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.12 | 1.10 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -43.07% | -42.46% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.36M | 2.28M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | SCCO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.97 | -0.39 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.97 | -0.58 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both companies show strong equity returns, but Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 60.72% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Southern Copper (SCCO) at 46.34% also sits in the top quartile.
SCCO
Materials industry group
46.34%
- Max
- 51.93%
- SCCO
- 46.34%
- Q3
- 18.20%
- Median
- 5.99%
- Q1
- -9.69%
- Min
- -50.42%
SHW
Materials industry group
60.72%
- SHW
- 60.72%
- Max
- 51.93%
- Q3
- 18.20%
- Median
- 5.99%
- Q1
- -9.69%
- Min
- -50.42%
Net Margin (TTM)
Southern Copper (SCCO) at 34.13% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 10.86%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
SCCO
Materials industry group
34.13%
- Max
- 35.99%
- SCCO
- 34.13%
- Q3
- 14.91%
- Median
- 3.99%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -21.87%
SHW
Materials industry group
10.86%
- Max
- 35.99%
- Q3
- 14.91%
- SHW
- 10.86%
- Median
- 3.99%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -21.87%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Southern Copper (SCCO) at 58.34% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 14.16%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
SCCO
Materials industry group
58.34%
- Max
- 66.92%
- SCCO
- 58.34%
- Q3
- 27.44%
- Median
- 10.11%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -32.85%
SHW
Materials industry group
14.16%
- Max
- 66.92%
- Q3
- 27.44%
- SHW
- 14.16%
- Median
- 10.11%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -32.85%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | SCCO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 46.34% | 60.72% |
| ROA (TTM) | 23.81% | 9.45% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 34.13% | 10.86% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 58.34% | 14.16% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 62.71% | 49.04% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Southern Copper (SCCO) at 17.38% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 2.06% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Southern Copper (SCCO) at 25.41% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at -2.75% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | SCCO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 17.38% | 2.06% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 10.13% | 2.10% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 25.41% | -2.75% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 17.64% | 9.95% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Southern Copper (SCCO) at 4.38 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.86 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.
SCCO
Materials industry group
4.38
- Max
- 6.31
- SCCO
- 4.38
- Q3
- 3.49
- Median
- 2.23
- Q1
- 1.42
- Min
- 0.12
SHW
Materials industry group
0.86
- Max
- 6.31
- Q3
- 3.49
- Median
- 2.23
- Q1
- 1.42
- SHW
- 0.86
- Min
- 0.12
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Southern Copper (SCCO) at 0.62 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.30 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.
SCCO
Materials industry group
0.62
- Max
- 2.02
- Q3
- 0.92
- SCCO
- 0.62
- Median
- 0.44
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
SHW
Materials industry group
3.30
- SHW
- 3.30
- Max
- 2.02
- Q3
- 0.92
- Median
- 0.44
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | SCCO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 4.38 | 0.86 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.62 | 3.30 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.23 | 3.16 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Southern Copper (SCCO) at 1.88% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.98% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
SCCO
Materials industry group
1.88%
- Max
- 4.91%
- Q3
- 1.96%
- SCCO
- 1.88%
- Median
- 0.46%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SHW
Materials industry group
0.98%
- Max
- 4.91%
- Q3
- 1.96%
- SHW
- 0.98%
- Median
- 0.46%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 30.45% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Southern Copper (SCCO) at 56.33% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
SCCO
Materials industry group
56.33%
- Max
- 97.44%
- SCCO
- 56.33%
- Q3
- 40.00%
- Median
- 9.04%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SHW
Materials industry group
30.45%
- Max
- 97.44%
- Q3
- 40.00%
- SHW
- 30.45%
- Median
- 9.04%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | SCCO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.88% | 0.98% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 56.33% | 30.45% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Southern Copper (SCCO) at 29.65 and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 31.07 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
SCCO
Materials industry group
29.65
- Max
- 58.49
- Q3
- 31.23
- SCCO
- 29.65
- Median
- 20.26
- Q1
- 12.90
- Min
- 4.66
SHW
Materials industry group
31.07
- Max
- 58.49
- Q3
- 31.23
- SHW
- 31.07
- Median
- 20.26
- Q1
- 12.90
- Min
- 4.66
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.28 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Southern Copper (SCCO) at 10.78 clears its benchmark range — SCCO looks notably rich on sales.
SCCO
Materials industry group
10.78
- SCCO
- 10.78
- Max
- 8.72
- Q3
- 4.01
- Median
- 1.86
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
SHW
Materials industry group
3.28
- Max
- 8.72
- Q3
- 4.01
- SHW
- 3.28
- Median
- 1.86
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Measured against book value, both Southern Copper (SCCO) at 13.31 and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 17.62 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.
SCCO
Materials industry group
13.31
- SCCO
- 13.31
- Max
- 7.76
- Q3
- 3.99
- Median
- 2.25
- Q1
- 1.38
- Min
- -0.30
SHW
Materials industry group
17.62
- SHW
- 17.62
- Max
- 7.76
- Q3
- 3.99
- Median
- 2.25
- Q1
- 1.38
- Min
- -0.30
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | SCCO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 29.65 | 31.07 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 10.78 | 3.28 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 13.31 | 17.62 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.71% | 2.72% |