RIO vs. SHW: Rio Tinto vs. Sherwin-Williams Stock Comparison
How do Rio Tinto (RIO) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Rio Tinto (RIO) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) both fall under the Materials industry group, but RIO is classified in Metals & Mining while SHW is classified in Chemicals.
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) trades as ordinary local shares, while Rio Tinto (RIO) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | RIO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Rio Tinto plc ADR | The Sherwin-Williams Company |
| Country/Region | United Kingdom | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Metals & Mining | Chemicals |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Diversified Metals & Mining | Specialty Chemicals |
| Market Capitalization | 136.19 billion USD | 83.13 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | June 28, 1990 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | RIO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 30.54% | 5.74% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 16.90% | 13.18% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 14.68% | 2.84% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | RIO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 30.72% | 29.59% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.63 | 1.02 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -35.25% | -42.46% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.35M | 1.72M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | RIO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.85 | 0.05 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.26 | 0.08 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 63.70% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Rio Tinto (RIO) at 19.31%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
RIO
Materials industry group
19.31%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- RIO
- 19.31%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
SHW
Materials industry group
63.70%
- SHW
- 63.70%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Rio Tinto (RIO) at 19.59% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 10.74%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
RIO
Materials industry group
19.59%
- Max
- 38.66%
- RIO
- 19.59%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
SHW
Materials industry group
10.74%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- SHW
- 10.74%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Rio Tinto (RIO) at 28.05% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 17.56% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
RIO
Materials industry group
28.05%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- RIO
- 28.05%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
SHW
Materials industry group
17.56%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- SHW
- 17.56%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | RIO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 19.31% | 63.70% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.11% | 9.48% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 19.59% | 10.74% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 28.05% | 17.56% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 29.75% | 48.60% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Rio Tinto (RIO) at 7.42% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 2.06% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Rio Tinto (RIO) at -13.97% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at -2.75% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | RIO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 7.42% | 2.06% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 1.24% | 2.10% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -13.97% | -2.75% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -7.23% | 9.95% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Rio Tinto (RIO) at 1.42 and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.71 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
RIO
Materials industry group
1.42
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- RIO
- 1.42
- Min
- 0.16
SHW
Materials industry group
0.71
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- SHW
- 0.71
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Rio Tinto (RIO) at 0.32 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.72 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.
RIO
Materials industry group
0.32
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- RIO
- 0.32
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
SHW
Materials industry group
3.72
- SHW
- 3.72
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | RIO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.42 | 0.71 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.32 | 3.72 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.58 | 3.04 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.91% pays an industry-typical yield; Rio Tinto (RIO) at 5.59% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.
RIO
Materials industry group
5.59%
- RIO
- 5.59%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SHW
Materials industry group
0.91%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- SHW
- 0.91%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 29.35% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Rio Tinto (RIO) at 54.46% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
RIO
Materials industry group
54.46%
- Max
- 83.62%
- RIO
- 54.46%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SHW
Materials industry group
29.35%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- SHW
- 29.35%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | RIO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 5.59% | 0.91% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 54.46% | 29.35% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Rio Tinto (RIO) at 11.35 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 31.66 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for RIO, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
RIO
Materials industry group
11.35
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- RIO
- 11.35
- Min
- 3.93
SHW
Materials industry group
31.66
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- SHW
- 31.66
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Rio Tinto (RIO) at 2.20 and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.34 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
RIO
Materials industry group
2.20
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- RIO
- 2.20
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
SHW
Materials industry group
3.34
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- SHW
- 3.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Rio Tinto (RIO) at 2.08 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 20.78 prices above its benchmark range — SHW looks rich relative to book.
RIO
Materials industry group
2.08
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- RIO
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
SHW
Materials industry group
20.78
- SHW
- 20.78
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | RIO | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 11.35 | 31.66 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.20 | 3.34 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.08 | 20.78 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.64% | 2.98% |