BHP vs. RIO: BHP vs. Rio Tinto Stock Comparison
How do BHP (BHP) and Rio Tinto (RIO) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
BHP (BHP) and Rio Tinto (RIO) are both classified in the Diversified Metals & Mining sub-industry within the broader Metals & Mining industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
Both BHP (BHP) and Rio Tinto (RIO) trade as ADRs — their core financials are comparable, but keep FX, depositary-program fees, and dividend withholding in view for each.
| Profile Item | BHP | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Name | BHP Group Ltd. Sponsored ADR | Rio Tinto plc ADR |
| Country/Region | Australia | United Kingdom |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Metals & Mining | Metals & Mining |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Diversified Metals & Mining | Diversified Metals & Mining |
| Market Capitalization | 223.22 billion USD | 158.55 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | June 28, 1990 |
| Security Type | ADR | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | BHP | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 72.04% | 63.42% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 20.11% | 22.08% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 18.57% | 15.98% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | BHP | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 34.30% | 30.39% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.74 | 0.56 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -37.21% | -35.25% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.54M | 2.42M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | BHP | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.97 | 1.94 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.97 | 2.92 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
BHP (BHP) at 24.00% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Rio Tinto (RIO) at 19.31% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for BHP.
BHP
Materials industry group
24.00%
- Max
- 58.68%
- BHP
- 24.00%
- Q3
- 19.46%
- Median
- 7.17%
- Q1
- -6.73%
- Min
- -41.32%
RIO
Materials industry group
19.31%
- Max
- 58.68%
- Q3
- 19.46%
- RIO
- 19.31%
- Median
- 7.17%
- Q1
- -6.73%
- Min
- -41.32%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both BHP (BHP) at 16.73% and Rio Tinto (RIO) at 19.59% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
BHP
Materials industry group
16.73%
- Max
- 38.66%
- BHP
- 16.73%
- Q3
- 16.04%
- Median
- 4.48%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -22.98%
RIO
Materials industry group
19.59%
- Max
- 38.66%
- RIO
- 19.59%
- Q3
- 16.04%
- Median
- 4.48%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -22.98%
Operating Margin (TTM)
BHP (BHP) at 43.34% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Rio Tinto (RIO) at 28.05%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
BHP
Materials industry group
43.34%
- Max
- 66.54%
- BHP
- 43.34%
- Q3
- 28.58%
- Median
- 12.48%
- Q1
- 1.68%
- Min
- -29.20%
RIO
Materials industry group
28.05%
- Max
- 66.54%
- Q3
- 28.58%
- RIO
- 28.05%
- Median
- 12.48%
- Q1
- 1.68%
- Min
- -29.20%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | BHP | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 24.00% | 19.31% |
| ROA (TTM) | 13.43% | 8.11% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 16.73% | 19.59% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 43.34% | 28.05% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 85.92% | 29.75% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both BHP (BHP) at 14.63% and Rio Tinto (RIO) at 7.42% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both BHP (BHP) at 8.91% and Rio Tinto (RIO) at -13.97% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | BHP | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 14.63% | 7.42% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 2.97% | 1.24% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 8.91% | -13.97% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -8.80% | -7.23% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
BHP (BHP) at 1.89 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Rio Tinto (RIO) at 1.42 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for RIO.
BHP
Materials industry group
1.89
- Max
- 6.33
- Q3
- 3.51
- Median
- 2.23
- BHP
- 1.89
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
RIO
Materials industry group
1.42
- Max
- 6.33
- Q3
- 3.51
- Median
- 2.23
- Q1
- 1.45
- RIO
- 1.42
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both BHP (BHP) at 0.50 and Rio Tinto (RIO) at 0.32 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
BHP
Materials industry group
0.50
- Max
- 2.03
- Q3
- 0.94
- BHP
- 0.50
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
RIO
Materials industry group
0.32
- Max
- 2.03
- Q3
- 0.94
- Median
- 0.47
- RIO
- 0.32
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | BHP | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.89 | 1.42 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.50 | 0.32 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.33 | 0.58 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
BHP (BHP) at 2.00% earns its spot in the top quartile of its industry’s yields; Rio Tinto (RIO) at 4.79% is past the top of its own peer range — territory where a dividend-safety check matters more than the headline number.
BHP
Materials industry group
2.00%
- Max
- 4.76%
- BHP
- 2.00%
- Q3
- 1.91%
- Median
- 0.37%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
RIO
Materials industry group
4.79%
- RIO
- 4.79%
- Max
- 4.76%
- Q3
- 1.91%
- Median
- 0.37%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both BHP (BHP) at 68.84% and Rio Tinto (RIO) at 54.46% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.
BHP
Materials industry group
68.84%
- Max
- 84.09%
- BHP
- 68.84%
- Q3
- 34.59%
- Median
- 7.64%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
RIO
Materials industry group
54.46%
- Max
- 84.09%
- RIO
- 54.46%
- Q3
- 34.59%
- Median
- 7.64%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | BHP | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.00% | 4.79% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 68.84% | 54.46% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Rio Tinto (RIO) at 13.14 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while BHP (BHP) at 22.29 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for RIO, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
BHP
Materials industry group
22.29
- Max
- 59.46
- Q3
- 32.47
- BHP
- 22.29
- Median
- 19.90
- Q1
- 14.40
- Min
- 6.36
RIO
Materials industry group
13.14
- Max
- 59.46
- Q3
- 32.47
- Median
- 19.90
- Q1
- 14.40
- RIO
- 13.14
- Min
- 6.36
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both BHP (BHP) at 3.80 and Rio Tinto (RIO) at 2.57 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
BHP
Materials industry group
3.80
- Max
- 11.02
- Q3
- 4.99
- BHP
- 3.80
- Median
- 2.09
- Q1
- 0.78
- Min
- 0.00
RIO
Materials industry group
2.57
- Max
- 11.02
- Q3
- 4.99
- RIO
- 2.57
- Median
- 2.09
- Q1
- 0.78
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Rio Tinto (RIO) at 2.42 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while BHP (BHP) at 4.38 carries an above-peer premium to book — BHP is pricier on assets.
BHP
Materials industry group
4.38
- Max
- 8.64
- BHP
- 4.38
- Q3
- 4.37
- Median
- 2.43
- Q1
- 1.40
- Min
- -0.27
RIO
Materials industry group
2.42
- Max
- 8.64
- Q3
- 4.37
- Median
- 2.43
- RIO
- 2.42
- Q1
- 1.40
- Min
- -0.27
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BHP | RIO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 22.29 | 13.14 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.80 | 2.57 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 4.38 | 2.42 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 4.30% | 2.27% |