Seek Returns

BHP vs. LIN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Here’s a clear look at BHP and LIN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBHPLIN
Company NameBHP Group LimitedLinde plc
CountryAustraliaUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS Industry GroupMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningChemicals
GICS Sub-IndustryDiversified Metals & MiningIndustrial Gases
Market Capitalization214.23 billion USD232.04 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980June 17, 1992
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

BHP trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, LIN is a standard domestic listing.

BHP’s market capitalization stands at 214.23 billion USD, while LIN’s is 232.04 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

BHP trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, LIN is a standard domestic listing.

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BHP and LIN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BHP
LIN
Loading price history…
BHP vs. LIN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBHPLIN
5-Day Price Return4.97%0.15%
13-Week Price Return12.49%8.26%
26-Week Price Return28.48%16.17%
52-Week Price Return50.21%12.26%
Month-to-Date Return4.97%0.15%
Year-to-Date Return23.96%17.70%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.42M2.14M
3-Month Avg. Volume9.70M2.48M
3-Month Volatility34.94%20.68%
Beta1.700.75

BHP’s beta of 1.70 points to significantly higher volatility compared to LIN (beta: 0.75), suggesting BHP has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BHP

20.89%

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
44.53%
Q3
18.99%
Median
9.89%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-23.03%

In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, BHP’s Return on Equity of 20.89% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LIN

18.40%

Chemicals Industry
Max
29.95%
Q3
13.87%
Median
5.23%
Q1
0.88%
Min
-17.79%

In the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, LIN’s Return on Equity of 18.40% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

BHP vs. LIN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BHP

18.97%

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
50.86%
Q3
22.67%
Median
8.44%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-28.40%

BHP’s Net Profit Margin of 18.97% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LIN

20.44%

Chemicals Industry
Max
23.93%
Q3
9.84%
Median
3.65%
Q1
0.22%
Min
-13.51%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.44% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BHP vs. LIN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BHP

41.86%

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
74.29%
Q3
35.22%
Median
13.34%
Q1
2.93%
Min
-43.05%

An Operating Profit Margin of 41.86% places BHP in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LIN

26.48%

Chemicals Industry
Max
29.08%
Q3
14.25%
Median
7.90%
Q1
3.16%
Min
-12.86%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.48% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BHP vs. LIN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBHPLIN
Return on Equity (TTM)20.89%18.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.11%8.21%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)18.97%20.44%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)41.86%26.48%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--48.77%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BHP

1.65

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
4.53
Q3
2.93
Median
2.03
Q1
1.55
Min
0.02

BHP’s Current Ratio of 1.65 aligns with the median group of the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LIN

0.83

Chemicals Industry
Max
3.68
Q3
2.40
Median
1.78
Q1
1.43
Min
0.83

LIN’s Current Ratio of 0.83 falls into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

BHP vs. LIN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BHP

0.56

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
1.18
Q3
0.53
Median
0.28
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

BHP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Metals & Mining industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.56. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

LIN

0.68

Chemicals Industry
Max
1.54
Q3
0.97
Median
0.71
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

LIN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.68 is typical for the Chemicals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BHP vs. LIN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BHP

6.06

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
47.59
Q3
20.29
Median
5.88
Q1
0.78
Min
-24.82

BHP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.06 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LIN

34.45

Chemicals Industry
Max
56.43
Q3
24.34
Median
7.57
Q1
2.54
Min
-21.49

LIN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 34.45 is in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

BHP vs. LIN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBHPLIN
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.650.83
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.280.62
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.560.68
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.0634.45

Growth

Revenue Growth

BHP vs. LIN: A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth at a Glance

SymbolBHPLIN
Revenue Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)10.83%8.25%
Revenue Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)0.72%4.96%
3-Year Revenue CAGR-7.66%0.62%
5-Year Revenue CAGR5.66%4.52%

EPS Growth

BHP vs. LIN: A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth at a Glance

SymbolBHPLIN
EPS Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)27.57%13.37%
EPS Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)-10.17%9.36%
3-Year EPS CAGR-33.72%21.09%
5-Year EPS CAGR2.48%25.41%

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BHP

2.77%

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
4.80%
Q3
2.00%
Median
0.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.77%, BHP offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

LIN

1.23%

Chemicals Industry
Max
6.69%
Q3
3.62%
Median
2.28%
Q1
1.05%
Min
0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Yield of 1.23% is consistent with its peers in the Chemicals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BHP vs. LIN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BHP

54.85%

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
146.71%
Q3
58.80%
Median
20.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BHP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 54.85% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LIN

40.16%

Chemicals Industry
Max
195.45%
Q3
117.45%
Median
55.57%
Q1
29.71%
Min
0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.16% is within the typical range for the Chemicals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BHP vs. LIN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBHPLIN
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.77%1.23%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)54.85%40.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BHP

19.77

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
57.98
Q3
34.47
Median
21.20
Q1
15.71
Min
6.17

BHP’s P/E Ratio of 19.77 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LIN

32.78

Chemicals Industry
Max
77.15
Q3
42.55
Median
23.94
Q1
14.14
Min
7.94

LIN’s P/E Ratio of 32.78 is within the middle range for the Chemicals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BHP vs. LIN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BHP

3.75

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
9.76
Q3
4.90
Median
2.82
Q1
1.04
Min
0.21

BHP’s P/S Ratio of 3.75 aligns with the market consensus for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LIN

6.70

Chemicals Industry
Max
4.80
Q3
2.35
Median
1.15
Q1
0.67
Min
0.18

With a P/S Ratio of 6.70, LIN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Chemicals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

BHP vs. LIN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BHP

3.30

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
7.40
Q3
3.87
Median
2.47
Q1
1.28
Min
0.41

BHP’s P/B Ratio of 3.30 is within the conventional range for the Metals & Mining industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LIN

5.96

Chemicals Industry
Max
5.00
Q3
2.81
Median
1.70
Q1
0.96
Min
0.33

At 5.96, LIN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Chemicals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BHP vs. LIN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBHPLIN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)19.7732.78
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.756.70
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.305.96
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.4745.56