Seek Returns

LIN vs. RIO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Here’s a clear look at LIN and RIO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolLINRIO
Company NameLinde plcRio Tinto Group
CountryUnited KingdomUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS Industry GroupMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryChemicalsMetals & Mining
GICS Sub-IndustryIndustrial GasesDiversified Metals & Mining
Market Capitalization233.21 billion USD175.47 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 17, 1992June 28, 1990
Security TypeCommon StockADR

LIN is a standard domestic listing, while RIO trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

LIN’s market capitalization stands at 233.21 billion USD, while RIO’s is 175.47 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

RIO is an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), allowing U.S. investors direct exposure to its non-U.S. operations. LIN, on the other hand, is a domestic entity.

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LIN and RIO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LIN
RIO
Loading price history…
LIN vs. RIO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLINRIO
5-Day Price Return0.82%7.46%
13-Week Price Return12.53%16.13%
26-Week Price Return22.37%47.89%
52-Week Price Return11.43%68.68%
Month-to-Date Return0.65%7.88%
Year-to-Date Return18.30%32.25%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.18M1.37M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.48M2.02M
3-Month Volatility20.14%32.08%
Beta0.751.31

RIO carries a higher beta at 1.31, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while LIN (beta: 0.75) exhibits greater stability.

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LIN

18.40%

Chemicals Industry
Max
29.95%
Q3
10.45%
Median
3.77%
Q1
-7.41%
Min
-33.63%

In the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, LIN’s Return on Equity of 18.40% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

RIO

18.11%

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
42.25%
Q3
21.22%
Median
12.20%
Q1
5.06%
Min
-17.83%

RIO’s Return on Equity of 18.11% is on par with the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LIN vs. RIO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LIN

20.44%

Chemicals Industry
Max
20.54%
Q3
7.22%
Median
2.51%
Q1
-3.08%
Min
-15.82%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.44% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RIO

17.29%

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
61.01%
Q3
27.39%
Median
12.19%
Q1
4.72%
Min
-20.48%

RIO’s Net Profit Margin of 17.29% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LIN vs. RIO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LIN

26.48%

Chemicals Industry
Max
32.38%
Q3
12.98%
Median
6.82%
Q1
-1.79%
Min
-14.13%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.48% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

RIO

25.91%

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
90.15%
Q3
42.76%
Median
19.77%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-39.91%

RIO’s Operating Profit Margin of 25.91% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LIN vs. RIO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLINRIO
Return on Equity (TTM)18.40%18.11%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.21%9.19%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.44%17.29%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.48%25.91%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.77%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LIN

0.83

Chemicals Industry
Max
4.10
Q3
2.55
Median
1.82
Q1
1.35
Min
0.83

LIN’s Current Ratio of 0.83 falls into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

RIO

1.53

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
5.16
Q3
3.14
Median
2.59
Q1
1.75
Min
0.54

RIO’s Current Ratio of 1.53 falls into the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LIN vs. RIO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LIN

0.68

Chemicals Industry
Max
2.41
Q3
1.30
Median
0.79
Q1
0.55
Min
0.00

LIN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.68 is typical for the Chemicals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RIO

0.41

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
1.06
Q3
0.50
Median
0.28
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

RIO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.41 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LIN vs. RIO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LIN

34.45

Chemicals Industry
Max
15.12
Q3
8.96
Median
2.23
Q1
-0.23
Min
-6.63

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 34.45, LIN demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Chemicals industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

RIO

9.07

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
42.22
Q3
22.98
Median
6.63
Q1
2.00
Min
-13.32

RIO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.07 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LIN vs. RIO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLINRIO
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.831.53
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.621.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.680.41
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)34.459.07

Growth

Revenue Growth

LIN vs. RIO: A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth at a Glance

SymbolLINRIO
Revenue Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)8.25%14.56%
Revenue Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)4.96%7.42%
3-Year Revenue CAGR0.62%1.24%
5-Year Revenue CAGR4.52%5.26%

EPS Growth

LIN vs. RIO: A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth at a Glance

SymbolLINRIO
EPS Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)13.37%-5.56%
EPS Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)9.36%-13.97%
3-Year EPS CAGR21.09%-7.16%
5-Year EPS CAGR25.41%0.28%

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LIN

1.22%

Chemicals Industry
Max
4.48%
Q3
2.95%
Median
2.04%
Q1
1.02%
Min
0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Yield of 1.22% is consistent with its peers in the Chemicals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RIO

3.42%

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
2.92%
Q3
1.35%
Median
0.48%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RIO’s Dividend Yield of 3.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

LIN vs. RIO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LIN

40.16%

Chemicals Industry
Max
125.87%
Q3
74.70%
Median
40.16%
Q1
21.00%
Min
0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.16% is within the typical range for the Chemicals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RIO

61.66%

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
70.98%
Q3
31.99%
Median
15.38%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RIO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 61.66% is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

LIN vs. RIO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLINRIO
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.22%3.42%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)40.16%61.66%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LIN

32.95

Chemicals Industry
Max
73.82
Q3
40.02
Median
29.24
Q1
16.53
Min
12.51

LIN’s P/E Ratio of 32.95 is within the middle range for the Chemicals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RIO

18.01

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
59.02
Q3
35.81
Median
22.28
Q1
16.40
Min
6.27

RIO’s P/E Ratio of 18.01 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LIN vs. RIO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LIN

6.73

Chemicals Industry
Max
4.43
Q3
2.14
Median
1.15
Q1
0.57
Min
0.09

With a P/S Ratio of 6.73, LIN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Chemicals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

RIO

3.11

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
11.56
Q3
6.67
Median
3.28
Q1
1.37
Min
0.20

RIO’s P/S Ratio of 3.11 aligns with the market consensus for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LIN vs. RIO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LIN

5.96

Chemicals Industry
Max
4.50
Q3
3.09
Median
1.57
Q1
1.20
Min
0.33

At 5.96, LIN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Chemicals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RIO

1.69

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
6.56
Q3
4.10
Median
2.78
Q1
1.74
Min
0.41

RIO’s P/B Ratio of 1.69 is in the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

LIN vs. RIO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLINRIO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)32.9518.01
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.733.11
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.961.69
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)45.7939.91