SHW vs. SW: Sherwin-Williams vs. Smurfit Westrock Stock Comparison
How do Sherwin-Williams (SHW) and Smurfit Westrock (SW) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) and Smurfit Westrock (SW) both fall under the Materials industry group, but SHW is classified in Chemicals while SW is classified in Containers & Packaging.
| Profile Item | SHW | SW |
|---|---|---|
| Name | The Sherwin-Williams Company | Smurfit WestRock Plc |
| Country/Region | United States | Ireland |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Chemicals | Containers & Packaging |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Specialty Chemicals | Paper & Plastic Packaging Products & Materials |
| Market Capitalization | 83.13 billion USD | 23.13 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | June 17, 2008 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | SHW | SW |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 5.74% | 29.05% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 13.18% | 14.60% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 2.84% | -0.16% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | SHW | SW |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 29.59% | 42.69% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.02 | 0.89 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -42.46% | -53.49% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.72M | 4.66M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | SHW | SW |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.05 | 0.58 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.08 | 0.94 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 63.70% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Smurfit Westrock (SW) at 2.57%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
SHW
Materials industry group
63.70%
- SHW
- 63.70%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
SW
Materials industry group
2.57%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- SW
- 2.57%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 10.74% and Smurfit Westrock (SW) at 1.50% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
SHW
Materials industry group
10.74%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- SHW
- 10.74%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
SW
Materials industry group
1.50%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- SW
- 1.50%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 17.56% and Smurfit Westrock (SW) at 6.38% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
SHW
Materials industry group
17.56%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- SHW
- 17.56%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
SW
Materials industry group
6.38%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- SW
- 6.38%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | SHW | SW |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 63.70% | 2.57% |
| ROA (TTM) | 9.48% | 2.50% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 10.74% | 1.50% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 17.56% | 6.38% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 48.60% | 17.67% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Smurfit Westrock (SW) at 47.70% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 2.06% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for SW.
EPS Growth
Both Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at -2.75% and Smurfit Westrock (SW) at 62.20% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | SHW | SW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 2.06% | 47.70% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 2.10% | 32.15% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -2.75% | 62.20% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 9.95% | -30.01% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Smurfit Westrock (SW) at 1.48 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.71 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for SHW.
SHW
Materials industry group
0.71
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- SHW
- 0.71
- Min
- 0.16
SW
Materials industry group
1.48
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- SW
- 1.48
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Smurfit Westrock (SW) at 0.78 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.72 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.
SHW
Materials industry group
3.72
- SHW
- 3.72
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
SW
Materials industry group
0.78
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- SW
- 0.78
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | SHW | SW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.71 | 1.48 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 3.72 | 0.78 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.04 | 2.96 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Smurfit Westrock (SW) at 4.02% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.91% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, SW the richer one.
SHW
Materials industry group
0.91%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- SHW
- 0.91%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SW
Materials industry group
4.02%
- Max
- 4.52%
- SW
- 4.02%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Smurfit Westrock (SW) reports payout ratio above 100% at 198.63%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Sherwin-Williams (SHW) reports 29.35%, ranking against industry peers normally.
SHW
Materials industry group
29.35%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- SHW
- 29.35%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SW
Materials industry group
198.63%
- SW
- 198.63%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | SHW | SW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.91% | 4.02% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 29.35% | 198.63% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 31.66 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Smurfit Westrock (SW) at 48.99 sits in the richer quartile — SW needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
SHW
Materials industry group
31.66
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- SHW
- 31.66
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
SW
Materials industry group
48.99
- Max
- 59.00
- SW
- 48.99
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.34 and Smurfit Westrock (SW) at 0.73 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
SHW
Materials industry group
3.34
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- SHW
- 3.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
SW
Materials industry group
0.73
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- SW
- 0.73
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Smurfit Westrock (SW) at 1.28 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 20.78 prices above its benchmark range — SHW looks rich relative to book.
SHW
Materials industry group
20.78
- SHW
- 20.78
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
SW
Materials industry group
1.28
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- SW
- 1.28
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | SHW | SW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 31.66 | 48.99 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.34 | 0.73 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 20.78 | 1.28 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.98% | 4.26% |