SHW vs. SUZ: Sherwin-Williams vs. Suzano Stock Comparison
How do Sherwin-Williams (SHW) and Suzano (SUZ) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) and Suzano (SUZ) both fall under the Materials industry group, but SHW is classified in Chemicals while SUZ is classified in Paper & Forest Products.
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) trades as ordinary local shares, while Suzano (SUZ) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | SHW | SUZ |
|---|---|---|
| Name | The Sherwin-Williams Company | Suzano S.A. - Sponsored ADR |
| Country/Region | United States | Brazil |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Chemicals | Paper & Forest Products |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Specialty Chemicals | Paper Products |
| Market Capitalization | 83.13 billion USD | 11.90 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | November 4, 2008 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | SHW | SUZ |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 5.74% | 9.33% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 13.18% | -1.70% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 2.84% | 4.04% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | SHW | SUZ |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 29.59% | 30.42% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.02 | 0.56 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -42.46% | -38.50% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.72M | 3.57M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | SHW | SUZ |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.05 | 0.17 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.08 | 0.26 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 63.70% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Suzano (SUZ) at 16.20%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
SHW
Materials industry group
63.70%
- SHW
- 63.70%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
SUZ
Materials industry group
16.20%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- SUZ
- 16.20%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 10.74% and Suzano (SUZ) at 15.94% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
SHW
Materials industry group
10.74%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- SHW
- 10.74%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
SUZ
Materials industry group
15.94%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- SUZ
- 15.94%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 17.56% and Suzano (SUZ) at 9.76% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
SHW
Materials industry group
17.56%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- SHW
- 17.56%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
SUZ
Materials industry group
9.76%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- SUZ
- 9.76%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | SHW | SUZ |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 63.70% | 16.20% |
| ROA (TTM) | 9.48% | 2.54% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 10.74% | 15.94% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 17.56% | 9.76% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 48.60% | 26.68% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 2.06% and Suzano (SUZ) at 5.72% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: Sherwin-Williams (SHW) reports EPS growth of -2.75%, ranked against its industry; Suzano (SUZ) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | SHW | SUZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 2.06% | 5.72% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 2.10% | 0.19% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -2.75% | -- |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 9.95% | -14.94% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Suzano (SUZ) at 2.54 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.71 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for SHW.
SHW
Materials industry group
0.71
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- SHW
- 0.71
- Min
- 0.16
SUZ
Materials industry group
2.54
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- SUZ
- 2.54
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both balance sheets lean debt-heavy versus peers, but SHW is more stretched: Suzano (SUZ) at 1.83 sits in the higher-leverage quartile and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.72 is above its industry benchmark range.
SHW
Materials industry group
3.72
- SHW
- 3.72
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
SUZ
Materials industry group
1.83
- Max
- 1.98
- SUZ
- 1.83
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | SHW | SUZ |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.71 | 2.54 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 3.72 | 1.83 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.04 | 4.28 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.91% and Suzano (SUZ) at 0.05% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
SHW
Materials industry group
0.91%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- SHW
- 0.91%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SUZ
Materials industry group
0.05%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- SUZ
- 0.05%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 29.35% and Suzano (SUZ) at 17.55% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
SHW
Materials industry group
29.35%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- SHW
- 29.35%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SUZ
Materials industry group
17.55%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- SUZ
- 17.55%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | SHW | SUZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.91% | 0.05% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 29.35% | 17.55% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Suzano (SUZ) at 7.49 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 31.66 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for SUZ, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
SHW
Materials industry group
31.66
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- SHW
- 31.66
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
SUZ
Materials industry group
7.49
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- SUZ
- 7.49
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Suzano (SUZ) at 0.23 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.34 prices around its industry’s middle — SUZ costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
SHW
Materials industry group
3.34
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- SHW
- 3.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
SUZ
Materials industry group
0.23
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- SUZ
- 0.23
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Suzano (SUZ) at 1.16 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile relative to book while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 20.78 prices above its industry range — a wide valuation gap against assets.
SHW
Materials industry group
20.78
- SHW
- 20.78
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
SUZ
Materials industry group
1.16
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- SUZ
- 1.16
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | SHW | SUZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 31.66 | 7.49 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.34 | 0.23 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 20.78 | 1.16 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.98% | -7.73% |