Seek Returns logo

LIN vs. SUZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LIN and SUZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

LIN is a standard domestic listing, while SUZ trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolLINSUZ
Company NameLinde plcSuzano S.A.
CountryUnited KingdomBrazil
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryChemicalsPaper & Forest Products
Market Capitalization226.18 billion USD12.01 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 17, 1992November 4, 2008
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LIN and SUZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LIN vs. SUZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLINSUZ
5-Day Price Return0.99%-1.58%
13-Week Price Return4.79%-0.02%
26-Week Price Return4.62%-10.05%
52-Week Price Return5.19%-1.06%
Month-to-Date Return4.80%1.65%
Year-to-Date Return15.21%-14.20%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.36M5.02M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.77M5.53M
3-Month Volatility12.85%22.76%
Beta0.960.19

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LIN

17.46%

Chemicals Industry

Max
26.17%
Q3
13.48%
Median
8.13%
Q1
2.52%
Min
-11.86%

In the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, LIN’s Return on Equity of 17.46% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SUZ

20.16%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
6.82%
Q3
5.52%
Median
4.14%
Q1
2.38%
Min
-1.81%

SUZ’s Return on Equity of 20.16% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

LIN vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LIN

20.20%

Chemicals Industry

Max
21.80%
Q3
9.57%
Median
4.44%
Q1
1.14%
Min
-11.30%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.20% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SUZ

15.26%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
18.06%
Q3
11.46%
Median
3.39%
Q1
1.84%
Min
-2.16%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.26% places SUZ in the upper quartile for the Paper & Forest Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LIN vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LIN

26.75%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.33%
Q3
13.97%
Median
8.08%
Q1
4.46%
Min
-8.10%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.75% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SUZ

26.63%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
31.11%
Q3
16.36%
Median
6.08%
Q1
4.04%
Min
-2.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.63% places SUZ in the upper quartile for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LIN vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLINSUZ
Return on Equity (TTM)17.46%20.16%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.10%4.94%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.20%15.26%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.75%26.63%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.45%37.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LIN

0.93

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
2.23
Median
1.73
Q1
1.39
Min
0.55

LIN’s Current Ratio of 0.93 falls into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SUZ

3.16

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
3.03
Q3
2.03
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.99

SUZ’s Current Ratio of 3.16 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

LIN vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LIN

0.67

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.94
Median
0.65
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

LIN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Chemicals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SUZ

2.28

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
1.61
Q3
0.82
Median
0.56
Q1
0.27
Min
0.05

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.28, SUZ operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Paper & Forest Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

LIN vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LIN

33.09

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
26.33
Median
9.38
Q1
3.10
Min
-9.39

LIN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 33.09 is in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

SUZ

0.53

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
14.16
Median
7.41
Q1
2.72
Min
-0.13

SUZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.53 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

LIN vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLINSUZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.933.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.702.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.672.28
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)33.090.53

Growth

Revenue Growth

LIN vs. SUZ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LIN vs. SUZ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LIN

1.21%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.56%
Q3
4.04%
Median
2.47%
Q1
1.45%
Min
0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Yield of 1.21% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

SUZ

3.79%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
6.30%
Q3
3.72%
Median
2.41%
Q1
1.71%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.79%, SUZ offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Paper & Forest Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

LIN vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LIN

40.71%

Chemicals Industry

Max
181.25%
Q3
95.01%
Median
53.52%
Q1
26.59%
Min
0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.71% is within the typical range for the Chemicals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SUZ

15.16%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
495.87%
Q3
219.88%
Median
83.21%
Q1
24.91%
Min
0.00%

SUZ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 15.16% is in the lower quartile for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

LIN vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLINSUZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.21%3.79%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)40.71%15.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LIN

33.69

Chemicals Industry

Max
42.94
Q3
29.77
Median
20.37
Q1
14.27
Min
6.19

A P/E Ratio of 33.69 places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

SUZ

8.48

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
36.56
Q3
23.55
Median
16.47
Q1
13.85
Min
5.22

In the lower quartile for the Paper & Forest Products industry, SUZ’s P/E Ratio of 8.48 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

LIN vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LIN

6.80

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.23
Median
1.01
Q1
0.55
Min
0.16

With a P/S Ratio of 6.80, LIN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Chemicals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

SUZ

1.29

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
2.15
Q3
1.30
Median
0.80
Q1
0.63
Min
0.30

SUZ’s P/S Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the market consensus for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LIN vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LIN

5.73

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.92
Q3
2.56
Median
1.54
Q1
0.97
Min
0.30

At 5.73, LIN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Chemicals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SUZ

1.50

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
1.90
Q3
1.25
Median
0.87
Q1
0.73
Min
0.25

SUZ’s P/B Ratio of 1.50 is in the upper tier for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LIN vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLINSUZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)33.698.48
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.801.29
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.731.50
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)44.6211.53