Seek Returns logo

SCI vs. YUM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at SCI and YUM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolSCIYUM
Company NameService Corporation InternationalYum! Brands, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryDiversified Consumer ServicesHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization11.21 billion USD40.77 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980September 17, 1997
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of SCI and YUM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

SCI vs. YUM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolSCIYUM
5-Day Price Return-2.18%-3.37%
13-Week Price Return4.32%0.96%
26-Week Price Return1.28%-0.94%
52-Week Price Return4.83%7.41%
Month-to-Date Return4.70%1.90%
Year-to-Date Return0.10%9.49%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.77M1.96M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.06M1.97M
3-Month Volatility16.62%20.58%
Beta0.910.73

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

SCI

32.84%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
32.65%
Q3
29.77%
Median
16.63%
Q1
11.08%
Min
2.26%

SCI’s Return on Equity of 32.84% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

YUM

117.64%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

YUM’s Return on Equity of 117.64% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

SCI vs. YUM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

SCI

12.60%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
18.84%
Q3
13.34%
Median
12.22%
Q1
7.92%
Min
3.76%

SCI’s Net Profit Margin of 12.60% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

YUM

18.11%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

A Net Profit Margin of 18.11% places YUM in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SCI vs. YUM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

SCI

22.39%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
19.23%
Median
15.23%
Q1
8.71%
Min
-0.71%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.39% places SCI in the upper quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

YUM

30.93%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 30.93% places YUM in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SCI vs. YUM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolSCIYUM
Return on Equity (TTM)32.84%117.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.05%21.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.60%18.11%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.39%30.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)26.41%46.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

SCI

0.61

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
3.40
Q3
1.97
Median
1.66
Q1
0.60
Min
0.15

SCI’s Current Ratio of 0.61 aligns with the median group of the Diversified Consumer Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

YUM

0.82

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

YUM’s Current Ratio of 0.82 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SCI vs. YUM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

SCI

3.23

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
2.92
Q3
1.22
Median
0.36
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.23, SCI operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Diversified Consumer Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

YUM

30.97

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 30.97, YUM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

SCI vs. YUM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

SCI

3.62

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
13.44
Q3
10.58
Median
5.57
Q1
3.04
Min
-2.17

SCI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.62 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Diversified Consumer Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

YUM

4.68

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

YUM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.68 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SCI vs. YUM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolSCIYUM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.610.82
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.560.64
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.2330.97
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.624.68

Growth

Revenue Growth

SCI vs. YUM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

SCI vs. YUM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

SCI

1.57%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
2.29%
Q3
0.98%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.57%, SCI offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Diversified Consumer Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

YUM

1.91%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

YUM’s Dividend Yield of 1.91% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SCI vs. YUM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

SCI

33.29%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
35.94%
Q3
25.79%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SCI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.29% is in the upper quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

YUM

53.77%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

YUM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 53.77% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SCI vs. YUM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolSCIYUM
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.57%1.91%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)33.29%53.77%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

SCI

21.22

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
33.95
Q3
25.14
Median
19.27
Q1
15.30
Min
5.58

SCI’s P/E Ratio of 21.22 is within the middle range for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

YUM

28.18

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

YUM’s P/E Ratio of 28.18 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SCI vs. YUM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

SCI

2.67

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
3.29
Q3
2.54
Median
2.27
Q1
1.92
Min
1.28

SCI’s P/S Ratio of 2.67 is in the upper echelon for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

YUM

5.10

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

YUM’s P/S Ratio of 5.10 is in the upper echelon for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SCI vs. YUM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

SCI

7.43

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
7.00
Q3
6.37
Median
3.31
Q1
2.13
Min
0.98

At 7.43, SCI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

YUM

208.10

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

At 208.10, YUM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SCI vs. YUM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Diversified Consumer Services and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolSCIYUM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.2228.18
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.675.10
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.43208.10
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)17.9926.29