RIVN vs. TM: Rivian Automotive vs. Toyota Motor Stock Comparison

Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Performance at a Glance

Risk

Drawdown

Rivian Automotive (RIVN) has an aggressive beta of 1.60, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Toyota Motor (TM) is defensive at 0.58 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Rivian Automotive (RIVN) is heavily traded at around 29.65M shares per day, whereas Toyota Motor (TM) sees a more moderate 435.39K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk at a Glance

Company Profile

Rivian Automotive (RIVN) and Toyota Motor (TM) are both classified in the Automobile Manufacturers sub-industry within the broader Automobiles industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Toyota Motor (TM) has more than two decades of public-market history since March 17, 1980, whereas Rivian Automotive (RIVN) listed on November 10, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Rivian Automotive (RIVN) trades as ordinary local shares, while Toyota Motor (TM) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Toyota Motor (TM) trades at 9.51 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Rivian Automotive (RIVN) has no P/E ratio this period.

Toyota Motor (TM) at 0.00 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Rivian Automotive (RIVN) at 4.07 prices above its industry range — a wide gap in sales valuation between them.

Both look rich against book: Rivian Automotive (RIVN) at 4.80 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Toyota Motor (TM) at 14.66 prices even higher, above its industry range.

Valuation at a Glance

Profitability

Rivian Automotive (RIVN) reports a negative ROE of -65.69%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Toyota Motor (TM) reports 10.23%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Rivian Automotive (RIVN) reports a negative net margin of -63.62%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Toyota Motor (TM) reports 7.59%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Rivian Automotive (RIVN) reports a negative operating margin of -63.79%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Toyota Motor (TM) reports 4.57%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability at a Glance

Growth

Revenue Growth

Revenue Growth at a Glance

EPS Growth

EPS Growth at a Glance

Financial Strength

Both Rivian Automotive (RIVN) at 2.10 and Toyota Motor (TM) at 1.27 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

Both Rivian Automotive (RIVN) at 1.18 and Toyota Motor (TM) at 1.07 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Dividends

Rivian Automotive (RIVN) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Toyota Motor (TM) reports a yield of 3.58%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Rivian Automotive (RIVN) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Toyota Motor (TM) reports a payout of 31.40%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividends at a Glance