RIVN vs. TM: Rivian Automotive vs. Toyota Motor Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Rivian Automotive (RIVN) and Toyota Motor (TM) are both classified in the Automobile Manufacturers sub-industry within the broader Automobiles industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Toyota Motor (TM) has more than two decades of public-market history since March 17, 1980, whereas Rivian Automotive (RIVN) listed on November 10, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Rivian Automotive (RIVN) trades as ordinary local shares, while Toyota Motor (TM) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Rivian Automotive (RIVN) has an aggressive beta of 1.60, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Toyota Motor (TM) is defensive at 0.57 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Rivian Automotive (RIVN) is heavily traded at around 34.61M shares per day, whereas Toyota Motor (TM) sees a more moderate 517.14K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Rivian Automotive (RIVN) reports a negative ROE of -65.69%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Toyota Motor (TM) reports 10.23%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Rivian Automotive (RIVN) reports a negative net margin of -63.62%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Toyota Motor (TM) reports 7.59%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Rivian Automotive (RIVN) reports a negative operating margin of -63.79%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Toyota Motor (TM) reports 4.57%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Rivian Automotive (RIVN) at 8.39% and Toyota Motor (TM) at 5.51% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Only one side can be read here: Toyota Motor (TM) reports EPS growth of -17.89%, ranked against its industry; Rivian Automotive (RIVN) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Both Rivian Automotive (RIVN) at 2.10 and Toyota Motor (TM) at 1.27 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

Both Rivian Automotive (RIVN) at 1.18 and Toyota Motor (TM) at 1.07 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Rivian Automotive (RIVN) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Toyota Motor (TM) reports a yield of 53.21%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Rivian Automotive (RIVN) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Toyota Motor (TM) reports a payout of 31.40%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Toyota Motor (TM) trades at 9.79 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Rivian Automotive (RIVN) has no P/E ratio this period.

Toyota Motor (TM) at 0.00 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Rivian Automotive (RIVN) at 4.65 prices above its industry range — a wide gap in sales valuation between them.

Measured against book value, both Rivian Automotive (RIVN) at 5.08 and Toyota Motor (TM) at 15.26 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.

Valuation Metrics