Seek Returns logo

GM vs. RIVN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at GM and RIVN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolGMRIVN
Company NameGeneral Motors CompanyRivian Automotive, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobilesAutomobiles
Market Capitalization58.40 billion USD18.92 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateNovember 18, 2010November 10, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of GM and RIVN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

GM vs. RIVN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolGMRIVN
5-Day Price Return1.24%-7.03%
13-Week Price Return17.89%6.84%
26-Week Price Return29.96%21.32%
52-Week Price Return36.80%26.55%
Month-to-Date Return0.61%8.18%
Year-to-Date Return15.15%10.38%
10-Day Avg. Volume8.46M52.01M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.71M38.39M
3-Month Volatility31.00%44.29%
Beta1.321.86

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

GM

7.21%

Automobiles Industry

Max
28.52%
Q3
12.70%
Median
5.15%
Q1
-1.62%
Min
-18.19%

GM’s Return on Equity of 7.21% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RIVN

-56.67%

Automobiles Industry

Max
28.52%
Q3
12.70%
Median
5.15%
Q1
-1.62%
Min
-18.19%

RIVN has a negative Return on Equity of -56.67%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

GM vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

GM

2.54%

Automobiles Industry

Max
8.82%
Q3
5.80%
Median
2.77%
Q1
-1.08%
Min
-10.15%

GM’s Net Profit Margin of 2.54% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobiles industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RIVN

-68.06%

Automobiles Industry

Max
8.82%
Q3
5.80%
Median
2.77%
Q1
-1.08%
Min
-10.15%

RIVN has a negative Net Profit Margin of -68.06%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

GM vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

GM

3.42%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
6.94%
Median
4.50%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-13.85%

GM’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.42% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RIVN

-72.04%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
6.94%
Median
4.50%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-13.85%

RIVN has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -72.04%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

GM vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolGMRIVN
Return on Equity (TTM)7.21%-56.67%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.67%-23.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.54%-68.06%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)3.42%-72.04%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)10.97%-4.91%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

GM

1.22

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.52
Median
1.29
Q1
1.09
Min
0.47

GM’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RIVN

3.44

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.52
Median
1.29
Q1
1.09
Min
0.47

RIVN’s Current Ratio of 3.44 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Automobiles industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

GM vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

GM

2.05

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.07
Q3
1.17
Median
0.60
Q1
0.30
Min
0.05

GM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Automobiles industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.05. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

RIVN

0.73

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.07
Q3
1.17
Median
0.60
Q1
0.30
Min
0.05

RIVN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.73 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GM vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

GM

25.00

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
37.26
Median
13.42
Q1
1.43
Min
-49.07

GM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 25.00 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RIVN

-179.31

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
37.26
Median
13.42
Q1
1.43
Min
-49.07

RIVN has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -179.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GM vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolGMRIVN
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.223.44
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.052.72
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.050.73
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)25.00-179.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

GM vs. RIVN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

GM vs. RIVN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

GM

1.10%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.85%
Q3
4.84%
Median
2.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GM’s Dividend Yield of 1.10% is consistent with its peers in the Automobiles industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RIVN

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.85%
Q3
4.84%
Median
2.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RIVN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GM vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

GM

6.61%

Automobiles Industry

Max
131.16%
Q3
60.59%
Median
36.73%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.00%

GM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.61% is within the typical range for the Automobiles industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RIVN

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
131.16%
Q3
60.59%
Median
36.73%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.00%

RIVN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GM vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolGMRIVN
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.10%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)6.61%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

GM

12.16

Automobiles Industry

Max
31.95
Q3
22.20
Median
11.17
Q1
7.39
Min
4.54

GM’s P/E Ratio of 12.16 is within the middle range for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RIVN

--

Automobiles Industry

Max
31.95
Q3
22.20
Median
11.17
Q1
7.39
Min
4.54

P/E Ratio data for RIVN is currently unavailable.

GM vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

GM

0.31

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.92
Median
0.47
Q1
0.24
Min
0.09

GM’s P/S Ratio of 0.31 aligns with the market consensus for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

RIVN

3.44

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.92
Median
0.47
Q1
0.24
Min
0.09

With a P/S Ratio of 3.44, RIVN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GM vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

GM

0.71

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
1.83
Median
0.79
Q1
0.47
Min
0.18

GM’s P/B Ratio of 0.71 is within the conventional range for the Automobiles industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

RIVN

2.71

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
1.83
Median
0.79
Q1
0.47
Min
0.18

RIVN’s P/B Ratio of 2.71 is in the upper tier for the Automobiles industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GM vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolGMRIVN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.16--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.313.44
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.712.71
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)45.07--