PSO vs. TCOM: Pearson vs. Trip.com Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Pearson (PSO) and Trip.com (TCOM) both fall under the Consumer Services industry group, but PSO is classified in Diversified Consumer Services while TCOM is classified in Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure.

Both Pearson (PSO) and Trip.com (TCOM) trade as ADRs — their core financials are comparable, but keep FX, depositary-program fees, and dividend withholding in view for each.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Trip.com (TCOM) reports a negative beta of -0.04, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Pearson (PSO) has a non-negative beta of 0.43.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Pearson (PSO) at 9.16% and Trip.com (TCOM) at 15.65% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Trip.com (TCOM) at 36.91% converts revenue to bottom-line profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while Pearson (PSO) at 8.78% keeps roughly the typical share for its industry.

Trip.com (TCOM) reports a negative operating margin of -9.33%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Pearson (PSO) reports 13.32%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Trip.com (TCOM) at 17.10% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Pearson (PSO) at 0.70% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

Trip.com (TCOM) at 92.37% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Pearson (PSO) at -20.16% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for TCOM.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Trip.com (TCOM) at 1.33 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Pearson (PSO) at 2.00 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

Trip.com (TCOM) at 0.17 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Pearson (PSO) at 0.52 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Trip.com (TCOM) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Pearson (PSO) reports a yield of 1.46%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Trip.com (TCOM) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Pearson (PSO) reports a payout of 51.09%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Trip.com (TCOM) at 8.95 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Pearson (PSO) at 25.78 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for TCOM, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

Trip.com (TCOM) at 0.43 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Pearson (PSO) at 2.86 prices around its industry’s middle — TCOM costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

On P/B ratio, both Pearson (PSO) at 2.38 and Trip.com (TCOM) at 1.18 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics