PKX vs. SHW: POSCO vs. Sherwin-Williams Stock Comparison
How do POSCO (PKX) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
POSCO (PKX) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) both fall under the Materials industry group, but PKX is classified in Metals & Mining while SHW is classified in Chemicals.
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) trades as ordinary local shares, while POSCO (PKX) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | PKX | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Name | POSCO Holdings Inc. American Depositary Receipt | The Sherwin-Williams Company |
| Country/Region | South Korea | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Metals & Mining | Chemicals |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Steel | Specialty Chemicals |
| Market Capitalization | 14.79 billion USD | 83.13 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | October 14, 1994 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | PKX | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -4.84% | 5.74% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -15.65% | 13.18% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -1.81% | 2.84% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | PKX | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 46.00% | 29.59% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.71 | 1.02 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -68.71% | -42.46% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 216.95K | 1.72M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | PKX | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.20 | 0.05 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.30 | 0.08 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 63.70% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than POSCO (PKX) at 2.21%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
PKX
Materials industry group
2.21%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- PKX
- 2.21%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
SHW
Materials industry group
63.70%
- SHW
- 63.70%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both POSCO (PKX) at 1.89% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 10.74% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
PKX
Materials industry group
1.89%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- PKX
- 1.89%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
SHW
Materials industry group
10.74%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- SHW
- 10.74%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both POSCO (PKX) at 4.26% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 17.56% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
PKX
Materials industry group
4.26%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- PKX
- 4.26%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
SHW
Materials industry group
17.56%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- SHW
- 17.56%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | PKX | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 2.21% | 63.70% |
| ROA (TTM) | 1.31% | 9.48% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 1.89% | 10.74% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 4.26% | 17.56% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 7.87% | 48.60% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 2.06% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while POSCO (PKX) at -6.09% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both POSCO (PKX) at -29.00% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at -2.75% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | PKX | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -6.09% | 2.06% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -6.72% | 2.10% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -29.00% | -2.75% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -39.42% | 9.95% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
POSCO (PKX) at 1.98 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.71 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for SHW.
PKX
Materials industry group
1.98
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- PKX
- 1.98
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
SHW
Materials industry group
0.71
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- SHW
- 0.71
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
POSCO (PKX) at 0.50 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.72 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.
PKX
Materials industry group
0.50
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- PKX
- 0.50
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
SHW
Materials industry group
3.72
- SHW
- 3.72
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | PKX | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.98 | 0.71 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.50 | 3.72 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.81 | 3.04 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.91% pays an industry-typical yield; POSCO (PKX) at 18,518.52% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.
PKX
Materials industry group
18,518.52%
- PKX
- 18,518.52%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SHW
Materials industry group
0.91%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- SHW
- 0.91%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 29.35% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while POSCO (PKX) at 51.60% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
PKX
Materials industry group
51.60%
- Max
- 83.62%
- PKX
- 51.60%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SHW
Materials industry group
29.35%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- SHW
- 29.35%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | PKX | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 18,518.52% | 0.91% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 51.60% | 29.35% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both POSCO (PKX) at 15.57 and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 31.66 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
PKX
Materials industry group
15.57
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- PKX
- 15.57
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
SHW
Materials industry group
31.66
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- SHW
- 31.66
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
POSCO (PKX) at 0.00 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.34 prices around its industry’s middle — PKX costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
PKX
Materials industry group
0.00
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- PKX
- 0.00
- Min
- 0.00
SHW
Materials industry group
3.34
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- SHW
- 3.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
POSCO (PKX) at 1.36 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 20.78 prices above its benchmark range — SHW looks rich relative to book.
PKX
Materials industry group
1.36
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- PKX
- 1.36
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
SHW
Materials industry group
20.78
- SHW
- 20.78
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | PKX | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 15.57 | 31.66 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 3.34 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.36 | 20.78 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -23,410.34% | 2.98% |