Seek Returns logo

LIN vs. PKX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at LIN and PKX, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

LIN is a standard domestic listing, while PKX trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolLINPKX
Company NameLinde plcPOSCO Holdings Inc.
CountryUnited KingdomSouth Korea
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryChemicalsMetals & Mining
Market Capitalization224.27 billion USD15.61 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 17, 1992October 14, 1994
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of LIN and PKX by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

LIN vs. PKX: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolLINPKX
5-Day Price Return0.09%-6.70%
13-Week Price Return3.06%14.43%
26-Week Price Return2.31%6.33%
52-Week Price Return1.15%64.30%
Month-to-Date Return3.92%-7.46%
Year-to-Date Return14.24%12.62%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.67M0.20M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.75M0.33M
3-Month Volatility12.13%39.82%
Beta0.960.17

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

LIN

17.46%

Chemicals Industry

Max
26.17%
Q3
13.48%
Median
8.13%
Q1
2.52%
Min
-11.86%

In the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, LIN’s Return on Equity of 17.46% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

PKX

1.98%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
16.14%
Median
7.01%
Q1
1.15%
Min
-19.85%

PKX’s Return on Equity of 1.98% is on par with the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LIN vs. PKX: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

LIN

20.20%

Chemicals Industry

Max
21.80%
Q3
9.57%
Median
4.44%
Q1
1.14%
Min
-11.30%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.20% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PKX

1.19%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
40.97%
Q3
17.87%
Median
7.03%
Q1
1.82%
Min
-20.01%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, PKX’s Net Profit Margin of 1.19% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

LIN vs. PKX: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

LIN

26.75%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.33%
Q3
13.97%
Median
8.08%
Q1
4.46%
Min
-8.10%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.75% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PKX

2.03%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
59.48%
Q3
26.06%
Median
10.50%
Q1
2.89%
Min
-21.46%

PKX’s Operating Profit Margin of 2.03% is in the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

LIN vs. PKX: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolLINPKX
Return on Equity (TTM)17.46%1.98%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.10%1.06%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.20%1.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.75%2.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.45%7.52%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

LIN

0.93

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
2.23
Median
1.73
Q1
1.39
Min
0.55

LIN’s Current Ratio of 0.93 falls into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

PKX

1.93

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.81
Q3
2.86
Median
1.94
Q1
1.45
Min
0.13

PKX’s Current Ratio of 1.93 aligns with the median group of the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LIN vs. PKX: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

LIN

0.67

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.94
Median
0.65
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

LIN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Chemicals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PKX

0.49

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.11
Q3
0.52
Median
0.29
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

PKX’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.49 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LIN vs. PKX: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

LIN

33.09

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
26.33
Median
9.38
Q1
3.10
Min
-9.39

LIN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 33.09 is in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

PKX

22.24

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
65.47
Q3
29.91
Median
5.88
Q1
0.91
Min
-26.49

PKX’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 22.24 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LIN vs. PKX: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolLINPKX
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.931.93
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.701.28
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.670.49
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)33.0922.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

LIN vs. PKX: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

LIN vs. PKX: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

LIN

1.21%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.56%
Q3
4.04%
Median
2.47%
Q1
1.45%
Min
0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Yield of 1.21% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

PKX

3.71%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.36%
Q3
3.78%
Median
1.41%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PKX’s Dividend Yield of 3.71% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LIN vs. PKX: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

LIN

40.71%

Chemicals Industry

Max
181.25%
Q3
95.01%
Median
53.52%
Q1
26.59%
Min
0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.71% is within the typical range for the Chemicals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PKX

51.19%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
63.28%
Median
38.78%
Q1
12.84%
Min
0.00%

PKX’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 51.19% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LIN vs. PKX: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolLINPKX
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.21%3.71%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)40.71%51.19%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

LIN

33.69

Chemicals Industry

Max
42.94
Q3
29.77
Median
20.37
Q1
14.27
Min
6.19

A P/E Ratio of 33.69 places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

PKX

26.66

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
57.44
Q3
32.87
Median
18.04
Q1
9.84
Min
0.00

PKX’s P/E Ratio of 26.66 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LIN vs. PKX: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

LIN

6.80

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.23
Median
1.01
Q1
0.55
Min
0.16

With a P/S Ratio of 6.80, LIN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Chemicals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

PKX

0.32

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
3.19
Median
1.97
Q1
0.59
Min
0.14

In the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, PKX’s P/S Ratio of 0.32 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

LIN vs. PKX: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

LIN

5.73

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.92
Q3
2.56
Median
1.54
Q1
0.97
Min
0.30

At 5.73, LIN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Chemicals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PKX

0.34

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
3.92
Q3
2.15
Median
1.40
Q1
0.84
Min
0.25

PKX’s P/B Ratio of 0.34 is in the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

LIN vs. PKX: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolLINPKX
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)33.6926.66
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.800.32
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.730.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)44.6222.92